Skip to main content

Abstract

This paper discusses Internet-telepresence systems with haptic coupling of operator and environment through a teleoperator. On the basis of known passivation and impedance matching techniques a novel approach to cope with discontinuous time delay variations as they can occur in the Internet is proposed and validated by experimental results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Anderson and M. Spong, “Bilateral Control of Teleoperators with Time Delay,” IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, vol. 34, pp. 494–501, 1989.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. G. Niemeyer and J.-J. Slotine, “Stable Adaptive Teleoperation,” IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 16, pp. 152–162, January 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Buss and G. Schmidt, “Control Problems in Multi-Modal Telepresence Systems,” in Advances in Control: Highlights of the 5th European Control Conference ECC’99 in Karlsruhe, Germany (P. Frank, ed.), pp. 65–101, Springer, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Salcudean, “Control for Teleoperation and Haptic Interfaces,” in Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences 230: Control Problems in Robotics and Automation (B. Siciliano and K. Valavanis, eds.), pp. 51–66, London: Springer, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. R. R. Luck and Y. Halevi, “Observability under Recurrent Loss of Data,” AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, vol. 15, pp. 284–287, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Y.-P. Huang and K. Zhou, “Robust Stability of Uncertain Time-Delay Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 45, pp. 2169–2173, 2000.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. G. Niemeyer and J. E. Slotine, “Towards Force-Reflecting Teleoperation Over the Internet,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, (Leuven, Belgium), pp. 1909–1915, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Baier, M. Buss, and G. Schmidt, “Control Mode Switching for Teledrilling Based on a Hybrid System Model,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics AIM’ 97, (Tokyo, Japan, Paper No. 50), 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. Book, H. Lane, L. Love, D. Magee, and K. Obergfell, “A Novel Teleoperated Long-Reach Manipulator Testbed and its Remote Capabilities via the Internet,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, (Minneapolis, Minnesota), pp. 1036–1041, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Buss and G. Schmidt, “Multi-Modal Telepresence,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Mechatronics Forum, Science and Technology Forum 2000, (Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan), pp. 24–33, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Lee and M. Chung, “Adaptive Control of a Master-Slave System for Transparent Teleoperation,” Journal of Robotic Systems, vol. 15, pp. 465–475, 8 1998.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. W. Ferrell and T. Sheridan, “Supervisory control of remote manipulation,” IEEE Spectrum, pp. 81–88, October 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  13. W. Ferrell, “Delayed force feedback,” IEEE Transactions on Human Factors, vol. HFE-8, pp. 24–32, September 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Hannaford, “A design framework for teleoperators with kinesthetic feedback,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 5, pp. 426–434, August 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. K. Hirai and Y. Satoh, “Stability of a System with Variable Time Delay,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, pp. 552–554, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Kosuge, T. Itoh, and T. Fukuda, “Scaled Telemanipulation with Communication Time Delay,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, (Minneapolis, Minnesota), pp. 2019–2024, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  17. K. Kosuge, H. Murayama, and K. Takeo, “Bilateral Feedback Control of Telemanipulators via Computer Network,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems IROS, (Osaka, Japan), pp. 1380–1385, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. Leung, B. Francis, and A. Apkarian, “Bilateral controller for teleoperators with time delay via μ-synthesis,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 10, pp. 105–116, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Arcara and C. Melchiorri, “Control Schemes for Teleoperation with Time Delay: A Comparative Study,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems 950, pp. 1–16, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  20. T. Sheridan, Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  21. T. Sheridan, “Telerobotics,” Automatica, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 487–507, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. M.-Y. Shi, “Designing Force Reflecting Teleoperators with Large Time Delays to Appear as Virtual Tool,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2212–2218, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. Hirche, “Control of Teleoperation Systems in QoS Communication Networks.” Diploma Thesis, Control Systems Group, Technical University Berlin, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. Baier, M. Buss, F. Freyberger, J. Hoogen, P. Kammermeier, and G. Schmidt, “Distributed PC-Based Haptic, Visual and Acoustic Telepresence System—Experiments in Virtual and Remote Environments,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Conference VR’99, (Houston, TX), pp. 118–125, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. Baier, M. Buss, and G. Schmidt, “Stabilität und Modusumschaltung von Regelkreisen in Teleaktionssystemen,” at—Automatisierungstechnik, vol. 48, pp. 51–59, Februar 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. G. Niemeyer and J. E. Slotine, “Using Wave Variables for System Analysis and Robot Control,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1619–1625, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  27. D. Lawrence, “Stability and Transparency in Bilateral Teleoperation,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 9, pp. 624–637, October 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hirche, S., Buss, M. (2002). Haptic Internet-Telepresence. In: Hommel, G., Huanye, S. (eds) The Internet Challenge: Technology and Applications. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0494-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0494-7_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3942-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0494-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics