Abstract
Peter Ring was one of the first to really grasp the significance of pseudospin symmetry as a relativistic symmetry [1, 2, 3, 4]. Originally, pseudospin doublets were introduced into nuclear physics to accommodate an observed near degeneracy of certain normal-parity shell-model orbitals with non-relativistic quantum numbers (n r , ℓ, j = ℓ + 1/2) and (n r − 1,ℓ + 2, j = ℓ + 3/2) where n r , ℓ, and j are the single-nucleon radial, orbital, and total angular momentum quantum numbers, respectively [5, 6]. The doublet structure, is expressed in terms of a “pseudo” orbital angular momentum ~ℓ = ℓ + 1 coupled to a “pseudo” spin, ~s = 1/2. For example, (n r s 1/2, (n r − 1)d 3/2) will have ~ℓ = 1, (n r p 3/2, (n r − 1)f 5/2) will have ~ℓ = 2, etc. Since j = ~ℓ ± ~s, the energy of the two states in the doublet is then approximately independent of the orientation of the pseudospin. Some examples are given in Table 1. In the presence of deformation the doublets persist with asymptotic (Nilsson) quantum numbers [N, n 3, Λ, Ω = Λ +1/2] and [N, n 3, Λ + 2, Ω = Λ + 3/2], and can be expressed in terms of pseudoorbital and total angular momentum projections ~Λ = Λ + 1, Ω = ~Λ ± 1/2. This pseudospin “symmetry” has been used to explain features of deformed nuclei [7], including superdeformation [8] and identical bands [9, 10, 11]. While pseudospin symmetry is experimentally well corroborated in nuclei, its foundations remained a mystery and “no deeper understanding of the origin of these (approximate) degeneracies” existed [12].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
J.N. Ginocchio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 436.
J.N. Ginocchio and A. Leviatan, Phys. Lett. B 425 (1998) 1.
J.N. Ginocchio and D. G. Madland, Phys. Rev. C 57 (1998) 1167.
G.A. Lalazissis, Y.K. Gambhir, J.P. Maharana, C.S. Warke and P. Ring, Phys. Rev. C 58 (1998) R45.
A. Arima, M. Harvey and K. Shimizu, Phys. Lett. B 30 (1969) 517.
K.T. Hecht and A. Adler, Nucl. Phys. A 137 (1969) 129.
A. Bohr, I. Hamamoto and B.R. Mottelson, Phys. Scr. 26 (1982) 267.
J. Dudek et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 1405.
W. Nazarewicz et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 (1990) 1654.
F.S. Stephens et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 301
F.S. Stephens et al.,Phys. Rev. C 57 (1998) R1565.
A.M. Bruce et. al., Phys. Rev. C 56 (1997) 1438.
B. Mottelson, Nucl. Phys. A 522 (1991) 1.
A. L. Blokhin, C. Bahri, and J.P. Draayer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 4149.
A. Leviatan and J.N. Ginocchio, Phys. Lett. B in press, nucl-th/0108016.
A. Leviatan and J.N. Ginocchio, contribution to these proceedings.
J. Meng et al., Phys. Rev. C 58 (1998) R628.
J.N. Ginocchio and A. Leviatan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 072502.
J.N. Ginocchio, Phys. Rev. C 59 (1999) 2487.
P. von Neumann Cosel and J.N. Ginocchio, Phys. Rev. C 62 (2000) 014308.
T.D. Cohen et al., Prog, in Part, and Nucl. Phys. 35 (1995) 221.
J. N. Ginocchio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 4599.
H. Leeb and S. Wilmsen, Phys. Rev. C 62 (2000) 024602.
J. B. Bowlin, A. S. Goldhaber and C. Wilkin, Z. Phys. A 331 (1988) 83.
P. Alberto et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 5015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ginocchio, J.N., Leviatan, A. (2002). Relativistic Pseudospin Symmetry in Nuclei. In: Nazarewicz, W., Vretenar, D. (eds) The Nuclear Many-Body Problem 2001. NATO Science Series, vol 53. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0460-2_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0460-2_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0463-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0460-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive