Abstract
From the investigation of infinitives and null subjects in Wh-questions and from the results presented in Chapter 8, it emerges that the truncation approach as well as the ATOM approach must assume two kinds of null subjects in order to explain the fullness of the data. (2000) considers the child null subject occurring in the specifier of the root as the primary source of the null subject phenomenon in child language but admits the occurrence of PRO null subjects in infinitival structures because these are always licensed by UG. The first assumption explains the results of the previous chapter and the occurrence of null subjects in finite and non-finite environments, the latter explains the higher rate of null subjects in infinitival structures. The ATOM approach has always suggested that in addition to the PRO null subject licensed by [-TNS] infinitives, null subjects occurring in finite structures may be topic-drop (see Bromberg and Wexler 1995). This conjecture was motivated precisely by the observation that null subjects do practically not occur in finite Wh-questions in English. It was the correlation of the developmental curve of infinitives and null subjects in finite structures as shown for Danish by (1997), 1998 that made a topic-drop approach to finite null subjects unlikely. However, only a topicdrop approach can take care of the data distribution in Wh-questions in languages like Danish, German and French. So in the ATOM approach, it is assumed that topic-drop still plays a role — even if (in this approach) the bulk of finite null subjects in Danish is explained by their ‘disguised’ non-finite nature.1 However, if we admit topic-drop as a possibility for an initial finite null subject (especially in topic-drop languages like German), there remains the rarity of infinitives in Wh-questions which needs another, unrelated explanation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hamann, C. (2002). Other Areas of Investigation: Negation and Late Argument Drop. In: From Syntax to Discourse. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, vol 29. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0432-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0432-9_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0440-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0432-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive