Abstract
The medicine we know today developed in the past century when physicians started to examine systematically the structure and functions of the human organism — both when healthy and during an illness. The so-called mechanical model of illness became an essential paradigm of clinical thinking in the period which — using Kuhn’s terminology — we could call a period of normal science. For several years, however, we have been aware that the established paradigm of medicine has been questioned from various points of view. The increase of interest in clinical investigation (the critical clinical school) and in medical ethics has been a response to the uncontrolled introduction of new therapeutic techniques to medical practice. This has been closely connected with the fact that physicians have come to understand not only that clinical practice is an applied natural science, but also that clinical decisions always refer to value judgements. This explains why modern physicians discuss more and more often not only methods of treatment and prognoses, but also the patient’s quality of life.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
B. Maroszyńska-Jeżowska, “Relacja pacjent — lekarz w okresie paradygmatycznej niestabilności medycyny” [The Patient — Physician Relation in the Period of Paradigmatic Instability of Medicine], “Sztuka leczenia” [The Art of Healing] 1/98, p. 17–21.
See, e.g., I. Prigogine, “Czas, chaos i dwie kultury” [Time, Chaos and Two Cultures] in “Czy nauka jest dobra” [Is Science Good?] (Warsaw: CIS, 1997).
J.M. Bocheński “Między logikaąa wiarą” [Between Logic and Faith] (Warsaw, Noir sur Blanc, 1995), p. 234.
E. Fromm, “Ucieczka od wolnos`ci” [Escape from Freedom] (Warsaw: Czytelnik, 1993).
A. Camus, “Eseje” [Essays], (Warsaw: PIW, 1971), pp. 190–191.
A. Toffler, “Szok przyszlości” [Future Shock], (Warsaw: PIW, 1977), pp. 55–67.
Apart from the deeply rooted habit of using a maximally simplified picture of the world, the greatest obstacles include emotionalism and the destabilizing attitude expressed in the statement that in our day human matters are changing so fast that most action meant to solve them are bound to be fruitless.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maroszyńska-Jeżowska, B. (2002). Worries of a Human Person at the Turn of the Century in the Light of the History of Medicine. In: Tymieniecka, AT. (eds) Life Energies, Forces and the Shaping of Life: Vital, Existential. Analecta Husserliana, vol 74. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0417-6_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0417-6_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3914-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0417-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive