Advertisement

Predicting Groundwater Flow Behavior in Non — Uniform Aquifers in Contact with a Stream: An Extension to Ditch Drainage

  • H. Önder
Chapter
Part of the Nato Science Series book series (NAIV, volume 8)

Abstract

One-dimensional unsteady-state groundwater flow in various aquifers (uniform, non-uniform, fractured, semi-infinite, finite), resulting from a step change in the stream stage is reviewed as a stream-aquifer interaction problem. An analytical model developed earlier for finite fractured aquifers is extended to the problem of ditch drainage without replenishment in a fractured formation. The equations describing transient water table variations between drains, the evolution of the midpoint water table elevation with time, and the variation of the drain discharge with time are presented. An approximate formula for drain spacing is proposed. The differences between the behaviour of flow in a uniform homogeneous aquifer and that in a fractured aquifer are discussed. The results of the analysis showed that the ratio of storage coefficients of blocks and fractures, and the block-to-fracture hydraulic conductivity contrast are the influencing parameters. The proposed analytical model may be used for the design of unsteady-state drainage systems in fractured soils, and for dewatering problems where the water table is close to the ground surface, for example, in urban environments where rising groundwater levels are a problem.

Keywords

Water Table Unconfined Aquifer Fracture Aquifer Ditch Drainage Piezometric Head 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Breen, RR, Mag, V., and Seymour, B.S. (1994) The combination of a flood-retarding basin and wetland to manage the impact of urban runoff, Water Science and Technology 29(4), 103.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grischek, T., Nestler, W., Piechniczek, D., and Fischer, T. (1996) Urban groundwater in Dresden, Germany, Hydrogeology Journal 4(1), 48–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lerner, D.N. (1996) Urban Groundwater - an asset for the sustainable city, European Water Pollution Control 6(5), 43–51.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lerner, D.N. and Barrett, M.H. (1996) Urban groundwater issues in the United Kingdom, Journal of Hydrology 4(1), 80–89.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lerner, D.N., Burston, M.W., and Bishop RK. (1993) Journal of Hydrology 149(1-4), 111–135.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moench, A.F. and Barlow, P.M. (2000) Aquifer response to stream-stage and recharge variations, I. Analytical step-response functions, Journal of Hydrology 230,192–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Venetis, C. (1968) On the impulse response of an aquifer, BulUnt. Ass.Sci.Hydrology 13(3), 136–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Venetis, C. (1970) Finite aquifers: Characteristic response and applications, Journal of Hydrology 12, 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Venetis, C. (1971) Estimating infiltration and/or the parameters of unconfined aquifers from groundwater level observations, Journal of Hydrology 12,161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Streltsova, T D. (1975) Unsteady unconfined flow into a surface reservoir, Journal of Hydrology 27, 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gill, M.A. (1984) Water table rise due to infiltration from canals, Journal of Hydrology 70, 337–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gill, M.A. (1985) Bank storage characteristics of a finite aquifer due to sudden rise and fall of river level, Journal of Hydrology 76,133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Onder, H. (1994) Determination of aquifer parameters of finite confined aquifers from constant drawdown non-steady type-curves, Hydrological Sciences Journal 39(3), 269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Onder, H. (1997) Analysis of one-dimensional groundwater flow in a nonuniform aquifer, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 123(8), 732–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Onder, H. (1998) One-dimensional transient flow in a finite fractured aquifer system, Hydrological Sciences Journal 43(2), 243–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Onder, H. and Banna, M.S. (1998) Unsteady ID flow in unconfined nonuniform aquifers, After the Rain Has Fallen, Proceedings, Groundwater Management Symposium, 1998, International Water Resources Engineering Conference, pp. 51–56.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jacob, C.E. (1994) Notes on determining permeability by pumping tests under water table conditions, USGS Mimeo Report.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rorabaugh, M.I. (1960) Use of water levels in estimating aquifer constants in a finite aquifer, in Commission of Subterranean Waters, IAHS Publ. no. 52, 314–323.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rorabaugh, M.I. (1964) Estimating changes in bank storage and groundwater contribution to stream flow, in Symposium of Surface Waters, IAHS Publ. no. 63, 432–441.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moench, A.F. and Kisiel, C.C. (1970) Application of the convolution relation to estimating recharge from an ephemeral stream, Water Resources Research 6(4), 1087–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hall, F.R. and Moench, A.F. (1972) Application of the convolution equation to stream-aquifer relationships, Water Resour. Res. 8(2), 487–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pinder, G.F, Breedhoeft, J.D., and Cooper, H.H. (1969) Determination of aquifer diffusivity from aquifer response to fluctuations in river stage, Wat. Resour. Res. 5(4), 850–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reynolds, R.J. (1987) Diffusivity of a glacial-outwash aquifer by the floodwave-response technique, Ground Water 25(3), 290–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Onder, H. (1998) Unit response of a stream-nonuniform aquifer system and application of convolution relation, Proceedings of International Conference on Analytic Based Modelling of Groundwater Flow, Part 2, Nunspeet, The Netherlands, pp. 343–358.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Abu-Rizaiza, O.S., Sarikaya, H.Z., and Khan, M.Z.A. (1989) Urban groundwater rise and control: Case study, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage 115(4), 588–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nuscimento, N.O., Ellis, J.B., Baptista, M.B., and Deutch, J.C. (1999) Using detention basins: Operational experience and lessons, Urban Water 1,113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Drainage Manual (1993) U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mustafa, S. (1987) Water table rise in a semi confined aquifer due to surface infiltration and canal recharge, Journal of Hydrology 95(3-4), 269–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sewa Ram., Jaiswal, C.S., and Chauhan, H.S. (1994) Transient water table rise with canal seepage and recharge, Journal of Hydrology 163,197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rai, S.N. and Singh, R.N. (1992) Water table fluctuation in an aquifer system owing to time-varying surface infiltration and canal recharge, Journal of Hydrology 136(1-4), 381–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Verma, A.K., Gupta, S.K., Sing, K.K., and Chauhan, H.S. (1998) An analytical solution for design of bi-level drainage systems, Agricultural Water Management 37,75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Upadhyaya, A and Chauhan, H.S. (2000) An analytical solution for bi-level drainage design in the presence of évapotranspiration, Agricultural Water Management 45, 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Upadhyaya, A and Chauhan, H.S. (2001) Water table fluctuations due to canal seepage and time varying recharge, Journal of Hydrology 244, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sharma, H.C, Kapoor, P.N., and Chauhan, H.S. (2000) Transient Ditch Drainage of Two-Layered Soil, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 126(1), 14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Barenblatt, G.I., Zheltov, LP., and Kochina, I.N. (1960) Basic concepts in the theory of seepage of homogeneous liquids in fissured rocks (strata), J. Appl. Mat. and Mech. 24(5), 1286–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schilfgaarde, J.V. (1970) Theory of flow to drains, in V.T. Chow (eds.), Advances in Hydrosciences, Academic, New York, pp. 43–104.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Önder
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations