Skip to main content

Explosives Localisation and Pre-Identification Based on UHF Electromagnetic Waves

  • Chapter
Detection of Explosives and Landmines

Part of the book series: NATO Science Series ((NAII,volume 66))

Abstract

There are several ways in which ultra-high frequency (UHF) radio waves can be used for explosive’ detection. Firstly, UHF radio waves have relatively high penetration ability, and can be used to quickly localize the “anomaly” in the soil. Secondly, they are sensitive to the electrical properties of the hidden object, which can be used to identify the nature of this object, i.e. to determine whether the object belongs to a certain class (for example: metal - not metal; dielectric with big dielectric permeability - dielectric with small dielectric permeability). The widely used pulsed radars are capable of fast localization of anomalies [(1994), (1976), (1997)] and give some hints to their classification on the basis of definition of geometrical parameters of these anomalies [(1996), (1998)], intensity of scattered radiation, and presence of natural resonances [(1997)]. Use of short pulses with duration Δt ∼ 1 ns with an equivalent band of frequencies Δf ∼ 1 GHz has its advantages and disadvantages. The main advantages of the pulsed radars are:

  • They work at frequencies for which absorption in soil is low, and thus the pulse can penetrate rather deep.

  • They allow one to have powerful short pulses while keeping power consumption low.

  • There are a lot of standard ready-for-use methods for data analysis. The main disadvantages of using pulsed radiation are:

  • Low spatial resolution ΔL ∼ cΔt ∼ 30cm.

  • Need to account for signal distortion due to dispersion of the propagation medium.

  • Pulses do not have well-defined boundaries due to transition processes.

  • Strict requirements to the emitter and receiver: no multiple reflections, decoupling of emitter and receiver, stability.

  • High cost of generator of nanosecond pulses. Systems with continuous radiation of variable frequencies can also be used for detecting anomalies [(1974)]. The main advantages of such systems compared to pulsed radars are:

  • It is easy to provide a wide range of frequencies equivalent to the pulse length Δt ∼ 0.1 ns, hence spatial resolution ΔL ∼ cΔt ∼ 3 cm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Peters Jr. L., Daniels J. J., Young J. D., (1994), Ground penetrating radar as a subsurface environmental sensing tool. Proc. IEEE, vol. 82, pp. 1802–1822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffatt D. L., Puskar R. J., (1976), A subsurface electromagnetic pulse radar. Geophis., vol.41, pp. 506–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitebsky S., Carin L., Ressler M. A., Le F. H., (1997) Ultra-wide-band, short-pulse ground-penetrating radar: Simulation and measurement. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, vol. 35, pp.762–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgeous J. M., Smith G. S., (1996), A fully three-dimentional simulation of a ground-penetrating radar: FDTD theory compared with experiment. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, vol. 34, pp.36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carin L., Kapoor R., Baum C. E., (1998), Polarimetric SAR imaging of buried landmines. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, vol. 36, pp. 1985–1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C. C, Peters L., (1997), Buried unexploded ordnance identification via complex natural resonances. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat. vol.45, pp.1645–1654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson L. A., Weir W. W., (1974), Location and recognition of discontinuities in dielectric media using synthetic RF pulses. Proc. IEEE, vol. 62, pp. 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley W. and Lohnes P., (1971), Multivariate Data Analysis, Wiley, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnanadesikan R., (1977), Methods for Statistical Data Analysis of Multivariate Observations, Wiley, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharaf M., Illman D., Kowalski B., (1986), Chemometrics, Wiley, NY

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Averianov, V.P., Vishneveski, A.S., Vorobiov, I.B., Zubkov, M.D., Kuznetsov, A.V. (2002). Explosives Localisation and Pre-Identification Based on UHF Electromagnetic Waves. In: Schubert, H., Kuznetsov, A. (eds) Detection of Explosives and Landmines. NATO Science Series, vol 66. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0397-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0397-1_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0693-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0397-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics