Comparative Environmental Policy and Risk Assessment
Assessment of environmental impacts and risks associated with the implementation of public policy alternatives is a fundamental requirement in the selection of sustainable development strategies. Critical in this process is the identification of comparative risk measures that can be used effectively to communicate public risk, resolve conflict, and promote the selection of acceptable public policies. Under conditions of global market competitiveness, resource scarcity and degradation, and potential state conflicts, it is essential to provide comparative measures that permit policy design that balances socio-economic conditions with environmental stress.
Most environmental impacts are associated with the modification or intensification of land use inputs and practices in the broader context of economic development. Therefore, realistic risk assessment must be based on key indicators that effectively define comparative development potential, environmental constraints, and anticipated economic and environmental impacts. A comparative evaluation framework is discussed that defines the comparative advantage of the natural resource base and identifies fundamental capacities to sustain production rates of goods and services to promote societal well-being, while including measures of economic benefits and public risk.
Complex biophysical and socio-economic characteristics affect both the identification of critical policy issues and the selection of sustainable development strategies and their associated policies. In the newly emerging structures of economic integration and market globalization, it is critical to explore comparative measures of production opportunities and accumulative effects of environmental impacts. This will ensure improved production efficiencies, reduce environmental impacts, and enhance contributions to the quality of life of the country populations affected.
The identification of multilateral interests, challenges, and opportunities for economic development cooperation can be assisted by the systematic evaluation of policy initiatives. In this process, guidance by international organizations is critical in promoting international dialogue aimed at resolving perceived conflicts. Analytical approaches to identify key indicators are suggested to identify comparative policy strategies, resolve conflicts, and select and implement sustainable development policies.
It is also suggested that international environmental quality standards be identified and used to define standards of public risk tolerance limits, environmental carrying capacity constraints, and sustainability indicators.
KeywordsBiomass Sugar Migration Europe Transportation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization) 1994. Unpublished data cited in World Resources 1994–95, 183–194. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Higgins, G. M. et al. 1982: Potential Population Supporting Capacity Of Lands In The Developing World. FAO Technical Report FPA/INT/513.Google Scholar
- Schultink, G. 1997: Environmental Indices and Public Policy: A Systems Perspective on Impact Assessment and Development Planning. First International Conference on Environmental Indices: System Analysis Approaches, July 7–11, 1997. St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
- Schultink, G. 1998: “Environmental Indices and Public Policy: A Systems Perspective on Impact Assessment and Development Planning”. Internationaljournal of Environmental Studies, Vol. 47.Google Scholar
- Schultink, G. and R. van Vliet. 1997: Wetland Identification and Protection: North American and European Policy Perspectives. MSU-Agricultural Experiment Station Project Research Report No. 554.Google Scholar
- Turner, B.L. et al. 1990: The Earth as Transformed by Human Action. Cambridge.Google Scholar
- UNDP (United Nations Population Division) 1992: Long-range World Population Projection: Two Centuries of Population Growth, 1950–2150.Google Scholar
- USAID 1995: Annual Performance Report 1995: Environmental Chapter. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- USAID 1996: “Managing USAID’s Environmental Portfolio for Results”. Proceedings of the March 1995 Environmental Workshop on Performance Measurement. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- WCMC (World Conservation Monitoring Center) 1992: Global Diversity: Status of the Earth Living Resources. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
- WCMC (World Conservation Monitoring Center) 1993. Unpublished data WCMC. Cambridge, U.K. As referenced in World Resources 1994–95. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Winoto, J. and G. Schultink 1996: Impacts of Urbanization on Agricultural Sustainability and Rural Life in West Java, Indonesia. MAES Research Report No.545.Google Scholar
- World Bank 1997: Expanding the Measure of Wealth: Indicators of Environmentally Sustainable Development. Environmentally Sustainable Development Studies and Monograph Series No. 17. Washington D.C: World Bank.Google Scholar
- World Bank unpublished data (1993).Google Scholar
- World Resource Institute 1992: World Resources 1992–93. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- World Resource Institute 1994: Global Trends in Environment and Development. Washington D.C.Google Scholar