Skip to main content

School Choice and Educational Leadership: Rethinking the Future of Public Schooling

  • Chapter
Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 8))

  • 2459 Accesses

Abstract

The idea of school choice has become a popular and controversial route to school reform around the world since the 1980’s. It parallels neo-liberal, market-oriented moves in other social policy areas like health, housing, and social services and reflects the demands of an increasingly educated and demanding populace for more direct control of the institutions that affect them. The actual reforms undertaken in the name of “choice” go about providing parents with options in markedly different ways. The goals of these reforms, their scope, and the administrative details vary tremendously, reflecting differences in the organization of schooling and in the political forces affecting educational jurisdictions around the world. Working with these reforms involves understanding the controversies involved, and appreciating how the details of different approaches affect their implementation and their impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, D. (1992). The interaction of public and private school systems. Australian Journal of Education, 36, 213–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M., & Beane, J. (1999). Democratic schools. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibald, D. (2000). School choice and school stratification: Shortcomings of the stratification critique and recommendations for theory and research. Educational Policy, 14(2), 214–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armor, D. (1995). Forced justice: Desegregation and the law. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armor, D., & Peiser, B. (1998). Interdistrict choice in Massachussetts. In P. Peterson & B. Hassel (Eds.), Learning from school choice. Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arsen, D., Plank, D., & Sykes, G. (1999). School choice policies in Michigan: The rules matter. Lansing, Michigan: Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagley, C, & Woods, P. (1998). School choice, markets and special educational needs. Disability and Society, 13(5), 763–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S., Gewirtz, S., & Bowe, R. (1997). Circuits of schooling: A sociological exploration of parental choice in social class context. In A.H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, & A. Wells (Eds.), Education: Culture, economy and society. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. (1997). Education for democracy. The Good Society, 7(2), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R., Levine, R., & Steele, L. (1996). After 15 years: Magnet Schools in urban education. In B. Fuller & R. Elmore (Eds.), Who chooses? Who loses? Culture, institutions and the unequal effects of school choice (pp. 154–172). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosetti, L. (2000). Canadian charter schools at the crossroads. Kelowna, British Columbia: Society for the Advancement of Excellence in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandle, J.E. (1998). Governance and educational quality. In P. Peterson & B. Hassel (Eds.), Learning from School Choice. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruechler, M. (1996). Charter schools: Legislation and results after four years (PR-B13). Bloomington, Illinois: The Indiana Education Policy Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A. (1999). Policy lessons from Chicago’s experience with decentralization. Brookings papers on Educational Policy, 67–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A., Lee, V, & Holland, P. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callan, E. (1997). Creating citizens: Political education and liberal democracy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Teachers Federation. (1997). Behind the charter school myths. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Teachers Federation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnoy, M. (1998). National voucher plans in Chile and Sweden: Did privatization reforms make for better education? Comparative Education Review, 42(3), 309–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnoy, M. (2000). School choice? Or is it privatization? Educational Researcher, 28(8), 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, P.G., & Western, J. (1992). Choosing non-government secondary schooling. Australian Educational Researcher, 19(2), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceaser, J.W. & McGuinn, P. (1998). Civic Education Reconsidered. The Public Interest, 94(Fall), 84–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chubb, J. (1998). The performance of privately managed schools: An early look at the Edison Project. In P. Peterson & B. Hassel (Eds.), Learning from School Choice. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chubb, J.E., & Moe, T.M. (1990). Politics, markets and America’s schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clotfelter, C. (2000). Are whites Still fleeing? Racial patterns and enrolment shifts in urban public schools, 1987–1996. Duke University on line paper: http://www.pps.aas.duke.edu/people/faculty/clotfelter/flight.PDF

    Google Scholar 

  • Clotfielder, C. (1999). Public school segregation in metropolitan areas. Land Economics, 75(Nov), 487–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1992). Some points on choice in education. Sociology of Education, 65(4), 260–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cookson, P.W.J. (1994). School choice: The struggle for the soul of American education. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coons, J., & Sugarman, S. (1978). Education by choice: The case for family control. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, M. (1993). Parents, gender and educational Reform. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education. (1992). Choice and diversity. London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, W (1998). Common schools, uncommon identities: National unity and cultural difference. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M. (1994). Chartering urban school reform: Reflections on public high schools in the midst of change. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, C, Manno, B., & Vanourek, G. (2000). Charter schools in action: Renewing public education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, E., & Ladd, H. (2000). When schools compete: A cautionary tale. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitz, J., Halpin, D., & Power, S. (1993). Grant maintained schools: Education in the market place. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler-Finn, T. (1993/4). Why have they chosen another school system? Educational Leadership, 51(4), 60–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fund, T.T.C., & Foundation, D.(1992). Facing the challenge: The report of the 20th Century Fund Task Force on School Governance. New York: Twentieth Century Fund Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garn, G. (1998). The thinking behind Arizona’s charter movement. Educational Leadership, 55(2), 48–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauri, V. (1998). School choice in Chile: Two decades of school reform. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerin-Lajoie, D. (1995). Ecole secondaire de Pain Court. Toronto: Canadian Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirtz, S., Ball, S., & Bowe, R. (1995). Markets, choice and equity in education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G., & Matthews, D. (1991). Are data enough? Review of politics, markets and America’s schools. Educational Researcher, 20, 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, T, & Braden, J. (2000). Charting a new course: Fact and fiction about charter schools. Alexandra, VA: National School Board Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorard, S., & Fitz, J. (2000). Investigating the determinants of segregation between schools. Research Papers in Education, 15(2), 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grace, G. (1994). Education is a public good: On the need to resist the domination of economic science. In D. Bridges & T McLaughlin (Eds.), Education and the marketplace. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J., Peterson, P., & Du, J. (1998). School choice in Milwaukee: A randomized experiment. In P. Peterson & B. Hassel (Eds.), Learning from school choice. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J., Howell, W, & Peterson, P. (1998). Lessons from the Cleveland scholarship program. In P. Peterson & B. Hassel (Eds.), Learning from school choice. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, A. (1987). Democratic education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haig-Brown, C. (1995). Joe Duquette High School: Making the spirit dance within. Toronto: Canadian Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpin, D. (1997). Fragmentation into different types of school. In R. Pring & G. Walford (Eds.), Affirming the comprehensive ideal (pp. 41–53). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannaway, J. (1993). Decentralization in two school districts: Challenging the standard paradigm. In J. Hannaway & M. Carnoy (Eds.), Decentralization and School Improvement: Can We Fulfill the Promise? (pp. 135–162). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannaway, J., & Carnoy, M. (1993). Decentralization and school improvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henig, J. (1996). The local dynamics of choice: Ethnic preferences and institutional responses. In B. Fuller & R. Elmore (Eds.), Who chooses? Who loses? Culture, institutions and the unequal effects of school choice. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henig, J., & Sugarman, S. (1999). The nature and extent of school choice. In S. Sugarman & F Kemerer (Eds.), School choice and social controversy: Politics, policy and law. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henig, J.R. (1994). Rethinking school choice: Limits of the market metaphor. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, A. (1999). Expectations, opportunity, capacity and will: The four essential components of Chicago School Reform. Educational Policy, 13(4), 494–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, E, Maranto, R., & Milliman, S. (2000). Resistence in the trenches: What shapes teachers’ attitutdes toward school choice. Educational Policy, 14(2), 195–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A.O. (1970). Exit, voice and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffer, T, Greeley, A., & Coleman, J. (1987). Catholic high school effects on achievement growth. In E. Haertl, T. James, & H. Levin (Eds.), Comparing public and private schools. New York: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, W, Wolf, P., Peterson, P., & Campbell, D. (2000). Test score effects of school vouchers in Dayton, Ohio, New York City and Washington, DC: Evidence from randomized trials. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoxby, C. (1998). Analyzing school choice reforms that use America’s traditional forms of parental choice. In P. Peterson & B. Hassel (Eds.), Learning from school choice (pp. 133–157). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoxby, C. (forthcoming). Does competition among public schools benefit students and taxpayers? American Economic Review (http://www.economics. harvard.edu/faculty/hoxby/papers.html).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jong, M.J., & Braster, J. (1998). Educating for social cohesion in a pluralist society. In G. Walford & W. Pickering (Eds.), Durkheim and modern education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, J. (1998). Civil society: Old images, new visions. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (1998). Finding our way: Rethinking ethnocultural relations in Canada. Toronto: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassibille, G., Tan, J.P., et al. (2000). Expansion of private secondary education: Lessons from recent experience in Tanzania. Comparative Education Review, 44(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauder, H., Hughes, D., Watson, S., Thrupp, M., McGlinn, J., Newton, S., & Dupuis, A. (1999). Trading in futures: Why markets in education don’t work. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, WW (1999). Guest editor’s introduction. Chinese Education and Society, 32(3), 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. (1995). San Antonio school choice plans: Rewarding or creaming? Social Science Quarterly, 76(September), 513–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V, Croninger, R., et al. (1994). Parental choice of schools and social stratification in education: The paradox of Detroit. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(4), 434–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V, Croninger, R., & Smith, J. (1996). Equity and choice in Detroit. In B. Fuller & R. Elmore (Eds.), Who chooses? Who loses? Culture, institutions and the unequal effects of school choice (pp. 70–94). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesko, N. (1988). Symbolizing society: Stories, rites and structure in a Catholic high school. New York: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, E. (1976). The Alum Rock voucher demonstration project: Three years of implementation. Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. (1997). The teachers unions: How the NEA and AFT sabotage reform and hold students, parents teaches and taxpayers hostage to bureaucracy. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockheed, M., & Jiminez, E. (1994). Public and private secondary schools in developing countries. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockheed, M., & Jiminez, E. (1996). Public and private schools overseas: Contrasts in organization and effectiveness. In B. Fuller & R. Elmore (Eds.), Who chooses? Who loses? Culture, institutions and the unequal effects of school choice. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loveless, T. (Ed.) (2000). Conflicting missions? Teacher unions and educational reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, S., & Ray, B. (2000). The home education movement in context, practice and theory. Peabody Journal of Education, 75(1/2), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. (1992). Citizenship, diversity and education: A philosophical perspective. Journal of Moral Education, 21(3), 235–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. (1994). Politics, markets and schools: The central issues. In D. Bridges & T. McLaughlin (Eds.), Education and the marketplace. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. (1996). Educating responsible citizens. In H. Tarn (Ed.), Punishment, excuse and moral development. Adershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, D. (1995). The power of their ideas: Lessons for America from a small school in Harlem. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, M. (1986). Different by design: The context and character of three magnet schools. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D., & Davenport, S. (1990). Choice: The new improved sorting machine. In W. Boyd & H. Walberg (Eds.), Choice in education: Potential and problems. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murnane, R.J. (1986). Family choice in public education: The roles of students, teachers and system designers. Teachers College Record, 88(2), 169–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, J. (1996). Charter schools: Creating hope and opportunity for American education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Statesman editorial (2001). Comprehensives: Out of the bog. Volume 14(644).

    Google Scholar 

  • Noden, P. (2000). Rediscovering the impact of marketization: Dimensions of social segregation in England’s secondary schools, 1994–1999. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(3), 371–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1994). School: A matter of choice. Paris: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation: 161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, L. (2000). Redefining public schools. Education Week, 19(33).

    Google Scholar 

  • Orfield, G., & Eaton, S. (1996). Dismantling desegregation: The quiet reversal of Brown versus the Board of Education. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrinos, H., & Ariasingam, D. (1997). Decentralization of education. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peshkin, A. (1986). God’s choice: The total world of a fundamentalist Christian school. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P. (1998). School choice: A report card. In P. Peterson & B. Hassel (Eds.), Learning from school choice. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P., & Hassel, B. (1998). Learning from school choice. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plank, D., & Sykes, G. (2000). The school choice debate: Framing the issues. Michigan State University: The Education Policy Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plank, D., Arsen, D., & Sykes, G. (2000). Charter Schools and private profits. The School Administrator, 57(5), 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M. (1997). Institutional arrangements and the creation of social capital: The effects of school choice. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 82–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanker, A. (1988). Restructuring our schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 65(3), 97–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smrekar, C, & Goldring, E. (1999). School choice in urban America: Magnet schools and the pursuit of equity. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapper, T. (1997). Fee-paying schools and educational change in Britain. London: The Woburn Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1992). Multiculturalism and the politics of recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local public expenditure. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toch, T. (1992). Public schools of choice. American School Board Journal, 178(7), 18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyack, D., & Hansot, E. (1982). Managers of virtue: Public school leadership in America, 1820–1980. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Education. (2000). National study of charter schools: 4th Year report. Washington, DC: RPP International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, C, & Martin, J. (2000). School-based parents’ groups: A politics of voice and representation? Journal of Education Policy, 15(5), 459–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walberg, H. (2000). The market theory of school choice. Education Week, 19(42).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walford, G. (2000). A policy adventure: Sponsored, grant maintained schools. Educational Studies, 26(2), 247–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walford, G., & Miller, H. (1991). City technology college. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walford, G., & Pickering, W. (Eds.) (1998). Durkheim and modern education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walford, G., (Ed.) (1989). Private schools in ten countries: Policy and practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehlage, G.G., Rutter, R., Smith, S., Lesko, N., & Fernandez R.R. (1989). Reducing the risk: Schools as communities of support. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A. (1996). African-American students’ view of school choice. In B. Fuller & R. Elmore (Eds.), Who chooses? Who loses? Culture, institutions and the unequal effects of school choice (pp. 25–49). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A., & Crain, R. (1996). Stepping over the color line: African-American students in white suburban schools. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A., Lopez, A., Scott, J., & Holme, J. (1999). Charter schools as postmodern paradox: Rethinking social stratification in an age of deregulated schools. Harvard Educational Review, 69(2), 172–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A., Gutzik, C, Carnochon, S., Slayton, J., & Vasudeva, A. (1999). Underlying policy assumptions of charter school reform: The multiple meanings of a movement. Teachers College Record, 100(3), 513–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A., Holme, J., Lopez, A., & Cooper C.W (2000). Charter schools and racial and social class segregation: Yet another sorting machine? In R. Kahlenberg (Ed.), A notion at risk: Preserving education as an engine for social mobility (pp. 169–222). New York: The Century Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, E.G. (1996). Educational vouchers in practice and principle: A world survey. Washington, DC: World Bank, Human Capital Development and Operations Policy Working Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, P. (1992). Teacher empowerment under “ideal” school site autonomy. Sociology of Education, 14(1), 69–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, P. (1996). Civic virtues and public schooling: Educating citizens for a democratic society. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, G., Power, S., & Halpin, D. (1998). Devolution and choice in education: The school, the state and the market. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, G., Edwards, T, & Gewirtz, S. (1993). Specialization and choice in urban education: The City Technology College Experiment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willie, C, & Alves, M. (1993). A report on the implementation of the revised Boston controlled choice plan. Boston, MA: Boston Public Schools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willms, D. (1985). Catholic effects on academic achievement: New evidence from the high school and beyond follow-up study. Sociology of Education, 58(1), 98–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willms, D., & Echols, F. (1992). Alert and inert clients: The Scottish experience of parental choice of schools. Economics of Education Review, 11(4), 339–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winerip, M. (1998). Schools for sale. New York Times Magazine, 42(June 14), 42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, J. (1992). Second year report: Milwaukee parental choice program. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, J. (1996). Who benefits from the Milwaukee choice program? In B. Fuller & R. Elmore (Eds.), Who chooses? Who loses? Culture, institutions and the unequal effects of school choice (pp. 118–137). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, J. (1999). The Milwaukee voucher experiment: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Fhi Delta Kappan, 81(1), 59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, P., Bagley, C, & Glatter, R. (1998). School choice and competition: Markets in the public interest. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gaskell, J. (2002). School Choice and Educational Leadership: Rethinking the Future of Public Schooling. In: Leithwood, K., et al. Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0375-9_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0375-9_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3920-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0375-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics