Abstract
There is a striking asymmetry between leftward and rightward movement in syntax: whereas leftward movement can in principle be unbounded, rightward movement is subject to very strict locality conditions. There are two possible approaches to explaining this asymmetry. One can either assume that some syntactic principle disfavours rightward movement, or that some mechanism having to do with sentence processing is responsible. In this chapter we will argue that a processing approach to limitations on rightward movement is more fruitful. In particular, we will argue that the human parser cannot process certain instances of rightward movement because the introduction of an antecedent-trace relation leads to a conflict with information about the parse which is already stored in short-term memory before this relation can be established. Similar problems do not occur in cases of leftward movement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baker, M. (1988). Incorporation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Berwick, R. and Weinberg, A. (1985). Deterministic parsing: a modern view. In Berman, S., Choe, J.-W., and McDonough, J., editors, Proceedings of NELS 18, pages 15–33, Amtierst: GLSA.
Büring, D. and Hartmann, K. (1997). The Kayne mutiny. In Beerman, D., LeBlanc, D., and van Riemsdijk, H., editors, Rightward movement, pages 59–80. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Pres.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cinque, G. (1996). The ‘antisymmetric’ programme: theoretical and typological implications. Journal of Linguistics. 32:447–464.
Culicover, P. and Rochemont, M. (1990). Extraposition and the complement principle. Linguistic Inquiry, 21:23–47.
Davis, H. and Alphonce, C. (1992). Parsing, linear asymmetry, and wh-movement. In Proceedings of NELS 22, pages 87–100, Amherst: GLSA.
Ernst, T. (1994). M-eommand and precedence. Linguistic Inquiry, 25:327–335.
Evers, A. (1975). The transformational cycle in Dutch and German. PhD thesis, Utrecht University.
Fodor, J. (1978). Parsing strategies and constraints on transformations. Linguistic Inquiry, 9:427–473.
Frazier, L. (1987). Syntactic processing: evidence from Dutch. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5:519–559.
Frazier, L. (1993). Processing Dutch sentence structures. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22:83–108.
Frazier, L. and Clifton, C. (1996). Construal. MIT Press.
Frazier, L. and Flores d’Arcais, G. (1989). Filler driven parsing: a study of gap filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 28:331–344.
Frazier, L. and Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: eye movements and the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14:178–210.
Gibson, E. (1991). A computational theory of human linguistic processing: memory limitations and processing breakdown. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.
Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68:1–76.
Gorrell, P. (1995). Syntax and parsing. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Greenberg, J. (1966). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, J., editor, Universals of Language (2nd edition), pages 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hoeksema, J. (1991). Complex predicates and liberation in Dutch and English. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14:661–710.
Just, M. and Carpenter, P. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99:122–149.
Kaan, E. and Stowe, L. (2001). Storage and computation in sentence processing: a neuroimaging perspective. This volume.
Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kimball, J. (1973). Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language. Cognition, 2:15–47.
Kluender, R. (1998). On the distinction between strong and weak islands: a processing perspective. In Culicover, P. and McNally, L., editors, Syntax and semantics 29: The limits of syntax, pages 241–279. San Diego: Academic Press.
Koster, J. (1974). Het werkwoord als spiegelcentrum. Spektator, 3:601–618.
Lamarche, J. (1991). Problems for N°-movement to NumP. Probus, 3:215–236.
Marcus, M., Hindle, D., and Fleck, M. (1983). D-theory: talking about talking about trees. In Proceedings of the 21st annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 129–136. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Neeleman, A. (1994). Complex predicates. PhD thesis, Utrecht University.
Neeleman, A. and Weerman, F. (1999). Flexible syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Pritchett, B. (1992). Grammatical competence and parsing performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Reuland, E. (1990). Head movement and the relation between morphology and syntax. In Booij, G. and Van Marie, J., editors, Yearbook of morphology 1990, pages 129–161. Dordrecht: Foris.
Rizzi, L. (1990). Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Roberts, I. (1985). The representation of implicit and dethematized subjects. PhD thesis, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Rochemont, M. (1992). Bounding rightward A’-dependencies. In Goodluck, H. and Rochemont, M., editors, Island constraints, pages 373–397. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Rochemont, M. and Culicover, P. (1990). English focus constructions and the theory of grammar. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Ross, J. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. PhD thesis, MIT.
Sturm. A. and Kerstens, J. (1978). Over verklaren in de taalkunde. In van Putte, P. and Verkuyl, H., editors, Nieuwe tegenstellingen op Nederlands taalgebied, pages 130–172. Instituut de Vooys, Utrecht.
Van Riemsdijk, H. (1998). Head movement and adjacency. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16:633–678.
Van Riemsdijk, H. and Williams, E. (1986). Introduction to the theory of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Weinberg, A. (1988). Locality principles in syntax and in parsing. PhD thesis, MIT.
Whitman, J. (1991). String vacuous V to COMP. GLOW Newsletter, 26:62–63.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ackema, P., Neeleman, A. (2002). Effects of Short-Term Storage in Processing Rightward Movement. In: Nooteboom, S., Weerman, F., Wijnen, F. (eds) Storage and Computation in the Language Faculty. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, vol 30. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0355-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0355-1_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0527-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0355-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive