Advertisement

The Structure and Logical Form of Negative Sentences in Arabic

  • Jamal Ouhalla
Part of the Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory book series (SNLT, volume 53)

Abstract

It is well known that languages differ in how they mark sentence negation overtly. For example, Standard French ((1989)) and West Flemish ((1995)) mark sentence negation with two elements, whereas Italian ((1990)) and English mark it with only one element. The same type of variation is found among Arabic varieties. The Western (North African) group mark sentence negation with two elements ((1992)) which are both obligatory in all contexts, except the ones which include a polarity phrase (see section 6) ((1992)). The (Middle) Eastern group has the same two-negation elements pattern, but the most dominant pattern is one where the postverbal negation element is missing, at least in verbless clauses/sentences. In this paper, the two groups are represented with Moroccan Arabic (1a) and Lebanese Arabic (1b), respectively.1 The preverbal negation element ma is glossed as NEG and the postverbal element š(i) as VAR(IABLE) for reasons that will become clear shortly.

Keywords

Noun Phrase Subject Position Propositional Variable Negation Element Predicate Variable 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acquaviva, Paolo. 1996. Negation in Irish and the representation of monotone decreasing quantifiers. In Borsely, Robert D. & Roberts, Ian (eds.) The Syntax of the Celtic languages, 284–313. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belletti, Adriana. 1990. Generalized Verb Movement. Torino: Rosenberg and SellierGoogle Scholar
  3. Benmamoun, Elabbas. 1992. Functional and Inflectional Morphology: Problems of Projection, Representation and Derivation. Ph.D dissertation. University of Southern California.Google Scholar
  4. Benmamoun, Elabbas. 1997. Licensing of negative polarity items in Moroccan Arabic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 263–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New-York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  6. Choueiri, Lina. 1995. Yes-No questions and the question particle shi in Lebanese Arabic. University of Southern California Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  7. Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. New-York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Diesing, Molly. 1992a. Bare plural subjects and the derivation of logical representations. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 353–80.Google Scholar
  9. Diesing, Molly. 1992b. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Español-Echevarria, Manuel. 1994. A typology for NP-licensing. University of California at Los Angeles Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  11. Haegeman, Liliane. 1995. The Syntax of Negation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heim, Irene. 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
  13. Jackendoff, Ray S. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kartunnen, Lauri. 1977. The syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 3–44. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 3-44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kayne, Richard S. 1991. Romance Clitics, Verb Movement and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 647–86.Google Scholar
  16. Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ladusaw, William A. 1992. Expressing negation. In Dowty, David R. & Barker, Chris (eds.) Proceedings from the Second Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SLAT II), 237–259. Columbus: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  18. Ladusaw, William A. 1996. Negation and polarity items. In Lappin, Shalom (ed.) The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, 321–342. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Lasnik, Howard & Saito, Mamoru. 1984. On the Nature of Proper Government. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 235–89.Google Scholar
  20. Moritz, Luc & Valois, Daniel. 1994. Pied-piping and specifier-head agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 667–707.Google Scholar
  21. Ouhalla, Jamal. 1988. The Syntax of Head Movement: A Study of Berber. Ph.D. dissertation. University College London.Google Scholar
  22. Ouhalla, Jamal. 1990. Sentential negation, relativised minimality and the aspectual status of auxiliaries. The Linguistic Review 7: 183–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ouhalla, Jamal. 1991. Functional Categories and Parametric Variation. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ouhalla, Jamal. 1993a. Negation, focus and tense: the Arabic 'maa' and 'laa'. Rivista di Linguistica 5: 275–300.Google Scholar
  25. Ouhalla, Jamal. 1993b. Subject-extraction, negation and the anti-agreement effect. In Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 477–516.Google Scholar
  26. Ouhalla, Jamal. 1997. Remarks on focus in Standard Arabic. In Eid, Mushira & Ratcliffe, Robert R. (eds.) Perspectives on Arabic linguistics, 9–45. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  27. Ouhalla, Jamal. 1999. Focus and Arabic clefts. In Rebuschi, George & Tuller, Laurice (eds.) The Grammar of Focus, 335–359. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  28. Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, Universal Grammar and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.Google Scholar
  29. Reinhart, Tanya. 1995. Interface Strategies. Research Institute for Language and Speech (OTS) Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  30. Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Rowlett, Paul. 1996. Negative configurations in French. Ph.D. dissertation. University of York.Google Scholar
  32. Shlonsky, Ur. 1997. Clause Structure and Word Order in Hebrew and Arabic: An Essay in Comparative Semitic Syntax. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Stowell, Tim & Beghelli, Filippo. 1997. Distributivity and negation: the syntax of each and every. In Szabolcsi, Anna (ed.) Ways of Scope Taking, 71–107. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  34. Wahba, Wafa. 1991. LF movement in Iraqi Arabic. In Huang, C-T. James & May, Robert (eds.) Logical Structure and Linguistic Theory, 253–276. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  35. Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1991. Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation. A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  36. Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1997. Negation and Clausal Structure. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jamal Ouhalla

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations