Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Kluwer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 9))

Abstract

Responsive evaluation is an approach, a predisposition, to the evaluation of educational and other programs. Compared to most other approaches it draws attention to program activity, to program uniqueness, and to the social plurality of its people. This same predisposition toward merit and shortcoming can be built into or can be recognized in other approaches, such as a stakeholder evaluation or connoisseurship evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 749.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atkin, J.M. (1963). Some evaluation problems in a course content improvement project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1, 129–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L.J. (1963). Course improvement through evaluation. Teachers College Record, 64, 672–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easley, J.A., Jr. (1966). Evaluation problems of the UICSM curriculum project. Paper presented at the National Seminar for Research in Vocational Education}. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J.C. (1997). Evaluation as advocacy. Evaluation Practice, 18, 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, D., Jenkins, D., King, C., MacDonald, B., & Parlett, M. (Eds.). (1977). Beyond the numbers game. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, E.R. (1980). Evaluating with validity. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kushner, S. (1992). A musical education: Innovation in the Conservatoire. Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabry, L. (1998). Portofios plus: A critical guide to alternative assessment. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, B. (1976). Evaluation and the control of education. In D.A. Tawney (Ed.) Curriculum evaluation today: Trends and implications. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, B., & Kushner, S. (Eds.). (1982). Bread and dreams, CARE. Norwich, England: University of East Anglia.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee, A., & Watts, M. (2000). Protecting Space? The Case of Practice and Professional Development Plans. Norwich, England: Centre of Applied Research in Education, University of East Anglia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parlett, M., & Hamilton, D. (1977). Evaluation as illumination: A new approach to the study of innovatory programmes. In D. Hamilton, D. Jenkins, C. King, B. MacDonald, & M. Parlett (Eds.), Beyond the numbers game. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwandt, T.A. (1989). Recapturing moral discourse in evaluation. Educational Researcher, 18(8), 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., & Leviton, L.C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R.E. (1974). Program evaluation, particularly responsive evaluation. Reprinted in W.B. Dockrell & D. Hamilton (Eds), (1980). Rethinking educational research. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R.E. (1986). Quieting Reform: Social science and social action in an urban youth program. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R.E. (1998). Hoax? Paper at the Stake Symposium on Educational Evaluation, May 9, 1998. Proceedings edited by Rita Davis, 363–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R.E., & Easley, J. (Eds.). (1978). Case studies in science education (Vols. 1-16). Urbana IL: University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R.E., Migotsky, C., Davis, R., Cisneros, E.J., Depaul. G., Dunbar, C., et al. (1997). The evolving synthesis of program value. Evaluation Practice, 18(2), 89–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stufflebeam, D.L., & Shinkfield, A.J. (1985). Systematic evaluation: A self-instructional guide to theory and practice. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stake, R. (2003). Responsive Evaluation. In: Kellaghan, T., Stufflebeam, D.L. (eds) International Handbook of Educational Evaluation. Kluwer International Handbooks of Education, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0849-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0309-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics