Advertisement

Evaluating Educational Programs and Projects in The Third World

  • Gila Garaway
Part of the Kluwer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE, volume 9)

Abstract

Educational evaluation in “third world” or developing nations is by no means a new phenomenon. It can, however, be quite different than that found in the “west” and thus warrants a separate view. The portrait and discussion that follow are general strokes. The aim is not to provide a definitive statement of what program evaluation looks like in third world countries, but rather to open a door onto some of the realities that are different than those in the west by providing samplings of what it looks like, how it’s different, and then some thoughts about its future.

Keywords

Educational System Program Evaluation Local Custom Participatory Approach Educational Evaluation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Evaluation Association Task Force on Guiding Principles for Evaluators. (1995). Guiding principles for evaluators. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 66, 19–26.Google Scholar
  2. Bamberger, M. (1999). Ethical issues in conducting evaluation in international settings. In J.L. Fitzpatrick, & M. Morris (Eds.) Current & emerging ethical challenges in evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 82, 89–99.Google Scholar
  3. Bhola, H.S. (1997). Systems thinking, literacy practice: Planning a literacy campaign in Egypt. Entrepreneurship, innovation and change, 6(1), 21–35.Google Scholar
  4. Bhola, H.S. (1998). Program evaluation for program renewal: A study of the National Literacy Program in Namibia (NLPN). Studies in Educational Evaluation, 24(4), 303–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bollinger, D., & Hofstede, G. (1987). Les differences culturelles dans le managements. Paris: Les Editions Organisation.Google Scholar
  6. Brunner, L., & Guzman, A. (1989). Participatory evaluation: A tool to assess projects and empower people. In R.F. Conner, & M. Hendricks (Eds.), International innovations in evaluation methodology. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 42, 9–18.Google Scholar
  7. Cookingham, F. (1992), Defining evaluation. Together 3, 21.Google Scholar
  8. Crespo, M., Soares, J.F., & de Mello e Souza, A. (2000). The Brazilian national evaluation system of basic education: Context, process and impact. Studies in Education Evaluation, 26(2), 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cronbach, L.J., et al. (1980). Toward reform of program evaluation. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Datta, L. (1999). The ethics of evaluation neutrality and advocacy. In J.L. Fitzpatrick, & M. Morris (Eds.), Current & emerging ethical challenges in evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 8, 77–89.Google Scholar
  11. Etounga-Manguelle, D. (2000). Does Africa need a cultural adjustment program? In L.E. Harrison, & S.P. Huntington (Eds.), Culture matters: How values shape human progress (pp. 65–77). Huntington, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Feuerstein, M.T. (1986). Partners in evaluation: Evaluating development and community programmes with participants. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Garaway, G. (1995). Participatory evaluation. Studies in educational evaluation, 21, 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garaway, G. (1996). The case-study model: An organizational strategy for cross-cultural evaluation. Evaluation, 2(2), 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giddens, A. (1987). Social theory and modern sociology. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  16. House, E.R. (1993). Professional evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The program evaluation standards: How to assess evaluations of educational programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Lapan, S.D. (in press), Evaluation research. In K.B. deMarrais, & S.D. Lapan (Eds.), Approaches to research in education and the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Morris, M. (1999). Research on evaluation ethics: What have we learned and why is it Important. In J.L. Fitzpatrick & M. Morris (Eds.) Current & emerging ethical challenges in evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 82, 89–99.Google Scholar
  20. Narayan-Parker, D. (1991). Participatory evaluation: Tools for managing change in water/sanitation. New York: PROWESS/UNDP/IBRD/UNICEF/WHO.Google Scholar
  21. Nevo, D. (2000, June). School evaluation: Internal or external? Paper presented at the International Seminar on School Evaluation, Seoul, Republic of Korea.Google Scholar
  22. OECD. (1992). Development assistance manual: DAC principles for effective aid. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  23. Rebien, C. (1996). Participatory evaluation of development assistance: Dealing with power and facilitative learning, Evaluation, 2(2), 151–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Worthen, B.R. (1990). Program evaluation. In H.J. Walberg & G.D. Haertel (Eds.), International encyclopedia of educational evaluation (pp. 42–46). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gila Garaway
    • 1
  1. 1.Moriah AfricaIsrael

Personalised recommendations