Abstract
One of the greatest dangers to pragmatism is relativism, as I freely translate Glenn McGee’s statement in his contribution to this volume. Pragmatist bioethics too easily sets aside questions about the foundations of knowledge. Ethical decisions are unavoidably made on the basis of knowledge about the situation in which we find ourselves, and therefore this basis deserves serious consideration. As McGee states: “The most important component of a genuine pragmatic bioethics is its ability to take seriously how difficult but unavoidable a challenge it is to ‘know’ those things about which there is much genuine disagreement, yet on the basis of which one must take important action”.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the Lifeworld. Bloomington and Minneapolis: Indiana University Press.
Ihde, D. (1993). Postphenomenology - essays in the postmodern context. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Ihde, D. (1998). Expanding Hermeneutics - visualism in science. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Verbeek, PP. (2002). Pragmatism and Pragmata. In: Keulartz, J., Korthals, M., Schermer, M., Swierstra, T. (eds) Pragmatist Ethics for a Technological Culture. The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0301-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0301-8_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1115-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0301-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive