Advertisement

Pragmatic Epistemology and the Activity of Bioethics

  • Glenn McGee
Part of the The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics book series (LEAF, volume 3)

Abstract

A century ago the names “pragmatism” and “pragmaticism” were given to a set of challenges to trends in philosophical scholarship of the late 19thand early 20thcenturies. Philosophers William James, John Dewey and Charles Saunders Peirce have been credited with what are collectively cited as the treatises that form what is often (and with some irony) referred to as the core of a “classical” American philosophical tradition. Taken together, the published work and correspondence of these three scholars alone comprises more than 20,000 typescript pages of philosophical scholarship, virtually all of which is aimed at the reconstruction of philosophy: the reconstruction of the role of experience in philosophy, the reconstruction of the role of philosophers in public life, and the reconstruction of the role of philosophy in social institutions. Shot through the work of Peirce, James, Dewey and others is the none-too-dated claim that disciplined philosophical activity can and must be linked to ordinary experiences, beliefs and activities.

Keywords

Phenomenal Character Philosophical Literature TIlE Activity Ordinary Experience Pragmatic Account 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

references

  1. Arras, J. (2001). “Freestanding Pragmatism in Law and Bioethics”in: Theoretical Medicine22: 69–85.Google Scholar
  2. Cairns, D. (1973). “An Approach to Husserlian Phenomenology”, in: R. Zaner (ed.)Phenomenology: Continuation and Criticism Essays in Memory of Dorton CairnsThe Hague: Phaenomenologica, Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  3. Carter, M. (2000). “A Synthetic Approach to Bioethical Inquiry”, In:Theoretical Medicine21: 217–234.Google Scholar
  4. Dancy, J. (1985).An Introduction to Contemporary EpistemologyNew York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Edie, J. (1987).William James and PhenomenologyBloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Husserl, E. (1991).Cartesian MeditationsDordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. James, W. (1912).Essays in Radical EmpiricismNew York: Longmans.Google Scholar
  8. James, W. (1956).The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular PhilosophyDover and New York.Google Scholar
  9. James, W. (1981).Pragmatismed. Bruce Kuklick, Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  10. James, W. (1981a).The Principles of Psychology3 Vols.,in The Works of William Jamesed. F. Burkhardt, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Lachs, J. (1987).Mind and PhilosophersNashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Miller, R., J. Fins and M. Bachetta, (1999). “A Pragmatic Theory of Bioethics”, in: G. McGee (ed.)Pragmatic BioethicsNashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Murphy, R.T. (1980).Hume and Husserl: Toward Radical SubjectivismThe Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  14. Natanson, M. (1962). “Existential Categories in Contemporary Literature”in: Literature Philosophy and the Social SciencesThe Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rockmore, T. and B. Singer (eds.) (1992).Antifoundationalism Old and NewPhiladelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Santayana, G. (1923).Scepticism and Animal FaithNew York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  17. Seigfried, C.H. (1992). “Like Bridges without Piers: Beyond the Foundationalist Metaphor”, in: T. Rockmore and B. Singer (eds.)Antifoundationalism Old and NewPhiladelphia: Temple UniversityPress.Google Scholar
  18. Smith, J. (1987). “The Reconception of Experience in Peirce, James, and Dewey”, in: Hausman (ed.)Pragmatism Considers PhenomenologyWashington: CARP.Google Scholar
  19. Stevens, R. (1974).James and Husserl: The Foundations of MeaningThe Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tlumak, J. (1992). “Justification T”, Unpublished notes written by Prof. Tlumak at Vanderbilt University, Nashville.Google Scholar
  21. Todd, Q. (1969).James Whitehead and Radical Empiricism. Dissertation at The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  22. Zaner, R.M. (1964).The Problem of EmbodimentThe Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  23. Zaner, R.M. (1970).The Way of PhenomenologyNew York: Pegasus.Google Scholar
  24. Zaner, R.M. (1976). “On the Sense of Method in Phenomenology”in: Existentialism and Phenomenology. Google Scholar
  25. Zaner, R.M. (1981).The Context of Self: A Phenomenological Inquiry Using Medicine as a ClueAthens.Google Scholar
  26. Zaner, R.M. (1988).Ethics and the Clinical EncounterEnglewoods Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glenn McGee

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations