Advertisement

Pragmatism in Action

Themes, Tasks and Tools
  • Jozef Keulartz
  • Michiel Korthals
  • Maartje Schermer
  • Tsjalling Swierstra
Part of the The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics book series (LEAF, volume 3)

Abstract

In this concluding chapter we will elaborate on our proposal for a pragmatist approach with regard to the moral problems and conflicts that are typical of a (dynamic and pluralist) technological culture. In the first section we will review the most important issues that came up during the workshop and that are present in the various contributions. In the second section we will further discuss the usefulness of pragmatism to ethics in a more concrete fashion, by assessing the possible and desirable roles or tasks of pragmatist ethics. In the third section we will further elaborate and adapt the “instruments” we introduced in the prologue.

Keywords

Conflict Management Discourse Ethic Technological Culture Moral Discourse Public Deliberation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arras, J.D. (2001). “Freestanding pragmatism in law and bioethics”, in: Theoretical Medicine 22: 69–85.Google Scholar
  2. Bohman, J. (1996). Public Deliberation. Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brandom, R.B. (2000). “Pragmatik und Pragmatismus”, in: Mike Sandbothe (FIrsg.) Die Renaissance des Pragmatismus. Velbrück Wissenschaft, p. 29–59.Google Scholar
  4. Caspary, W.R. (2000). Dewey on Democracy. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Conway, D.W. (1999). “Of Depth and Loss: The Peritropaic Legacy of Dewey’s Pragmatism”, in: C. Haskins and D.I. Seiple (eds.) Dewey reconfigured. Essays on Deweyan Pragmatism, New York: State University of New York Press, p. 221–249.Google Scholar
  6. De Wert, G. (2001). “Humane Embryonale Stamcellen als Heilige Graal. Een ethische reflectie”, in: Filosofie & Praktijk 22 (3): 34–57.Google Scholar
  7. Gimmler, A. (2000). “Pragmatische Aspekte im Denken Hegels”, in: Mike Sandbothe (Hrsg.) Die Renaissance des Pragmatismus. Velbrück Wissenschaft, p. 270–292.Google Scholar
  8. Gustafson, J.M. (1990). “Moral discourse about medicine: a variety of forms”, in: The journal of medicine and philosophy 15: 125–142.Google Scholar
  9. Habermas, J. (1997). Between facts and norms. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Haila, Y. (2000). “Beyond the Nature-Culture Dualism”, in: Biology and Philosophy,15: 155–175.Google Scholar
  11. Hankins, Th. L. and R. J., Silverman (1995). Instruments and the Imagination. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Hickman, L.A. (1990). John Dewey’s Pragmatic Technology. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hickman, L.A. (2001). Tools for Technological Culture. Putting Pragmatims to Work. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hottois, G. (1995). Philosophie et technosciences. Google Scholar
  15. Lakatos, I. and A. Musgrave (1970). Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. McGee, G. (ed.) (1999a). Pragmatic Bioethics. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  17. McGee, G. (1999b). “Pragmatic Method and Bioethics”, in: G. McGee (ed.), Pragmatic Bioethics. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, p. 18–29.Google Scholar
  18. Maclntyre, A. (1985). After Virtue. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  19. Rorty, R. (1996). “The Notion of Rationality”, in: J. Niznik & J.T. Sanders (eds.) Debating the State of Philosophy. Westport: Praeger Publishers, p. 84–88.Google Scholar
  20. Rorty, R. (1998). “Pragmatism as Romantic Polytheism”, in: M. Dickstein (ed.) The Revival of Pragmatism. Durham and London: Duke University Press, p. 21–37.Google Scholar
  21. Schermer, M and J. Keulartz. “Pragmatism as a Research Program - A Reply to Arras”, in: Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  22. Vorstenbosch, J. (1993). `Four Ways of Leaving the Ivory Tower. Perspectives on Research in Applied Ethics’. In: R. Heeger and T. van Willigenburg, The Turn to Applied Ethics. Kok Pharos Publicing, p. 36–50.Google Scholar
  23. West, C. (1989). The American Evasion of Philosophy. The University of Wisconsin PressGoogle Scholar
  24. Westbrook, R.B. (1998). “Pragmatism and Democracy: Reconstructing the Logic of John Dewey’s Faith”, in: M. Dickstein (ed.) The Revival of Pragmatism, Durham and London: Duke University Press, p. 128–141.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jozef Keulartz
  • Michiel Korthals
  • Maartje Schermer
  • Tsjalling Swierstra

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations