How Much Doubt can a Pragmatist Bear?
In the preceding chapter Bryan Norton attempts to provide a pragmatist epistemological basis to the strategy of “Adaptive Management” that has been proposed by Aldo Leopold and C.S. Holing as an approach to environmental monitoring and management. He also argues that there is an important analogy between adaptation in evolutionary theory and the adaptations at which Adaptive Management aims, thus reinforcing pragmatism’s claim to be based on sound Darwinian principles. I believe, however, that the prospects for this strategy of environmental management will be rather dim if it really has to be based on the “epistemology” set out by Norton. Furthermore, I also think that the suggested analogy with Darwinian evolutionary theory breaks down in important respects. The hopeful optimism Norton displays about the possibilities of Adaptive Management appears to be contrived and groundless.
KeywordsAdaptive Management Generational Cohort Preceding Chapter Darwinian Evolutionary Theory Successful Routine
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Huncker, H.L. (ed.) (1964), Erich W. Zimmermann’s Introduction to World Resources. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Nelson, R.R. and S.G. Winter (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Netherlands Scientific Council of Government Policy (1995). Sustained Risks: a Lasting Phenomenon (Reports to the Government 44). The Hague: Sdu..Google Scholar
- Rescher, N. (1995). Pluralism: Against the Demand for Consensus. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
- Weterings, R. and J. Opschoor (1994). “Environmental utilisation space and reference values for performance evaluation”, in: Milieu 9: 221–228.Google Scholar
- Ziman, J. (ed.) (2000). Technological Innovation as an Evolutionary Process. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar