Advertisement

A Pragmatist Epistemology for Adaptive Management

  • Bryan G. Norton
Part of the The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics book series (LEAF, volume 3)

Abstract

While many authors have lamented the apparent ambiguity of the term, “sustainability”, the idea does have an unquestionable core meaning. Sustainability has to do with concern for the future and with the obligations of earlier generations to steward resources and resource-generating systems for the benefit of the future. This core concern for the future implies that actions in the present may harm people in the future; it also implies that actors in the present can reasonably believe that some of their actions will be harmful - or at least risky - to the future and that other actions can be considered benign. Nobody, of course, can be certain of such judgments - and dealing with uncertainty must therefore be an important part of any planning for the future - but it is also important to acknowledge that a commitment to act to protect the interests of future people entails some ability to identify and evaluate future consequences of present actions. In this essay I set out to sketch an epistemology that is adequate to the challenge of providing a basis for judging current actions to be sustainable or not sustainable, and for addressing the uncertainties that inevitably constrain any attempt at living sustainably.

Keywords

Social Learning Belief System Adaptive Management Cultural Evolution Limited Realism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barber, B.R. (1985). Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Dewey, J. (1910). Influence of Darwin on Philosophy and Other Essays. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  3. Dewey, J. (1988). “Logic: The Theory of Inquiry”, in: The Later Works, Vol. 12, J.A. Boydston (ed.). The collected works of John Dewey. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Flader, S.L. (1974). Thinking Like a Mountain: Aldo Leopold and the Evolution of an Ecological Attitude Toward Deer,Wolves, and Forests. Lincoln: The University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  5. Gundersen, A.G. (1995). The Environmental Promise of Democratic Deliberation, Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  6. Haas, P.M. (1990). Saving the Mediterranean: The Politics of International Environmental Cooperation. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hadley, A.T. (1913). Some Influences in Modern Philosophic Thought. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hoffman, M. (2001). How to Get It. Manuscript delivered at international conference on Model-Based Reasoning, Pavia, Italy.Google Scholar
  9. Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lee, K. (1993). Compass and Gyroscope. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  10. Leopold, A.S. (1930). “The American Game Policy in a Nutshell”, in: Transactions of the Seventeenth American Game Conference - December 1--2, 1930. Google Scholar
  11. Leopold, A.S. (1939). “A Biotic View of Land”, in: Journal of Forestry 57: 727–730.Google Scholar
  12. Leopold, A.S. (1949). A Sand County Almanac. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Leopold, A.S. (1979). “Some Fundamentals of Conservation in the Southwest”, In: Environmental Ethics 1: 131–141.Google Scholar
  14. Meine, C. (1987). Personal Communication.Google Scholar
  15. Minteer, B.A. (forthcoming), “On Deweyan Democracy and Environmental Ethics”, in: B.P. Taylor and B.A. Minteer (eds.) Democracy and the Claims of Nature: Critical Perspectives for a New Century. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  16. Norton, B.G. (1995). “Ecological integrity and social values: At what scale”, in: Ecosystem Health (1)4: 228–241.Google Scholar
  17. Norton, B.G. and A. Steinemann (2001). “Environmental Values and Adaptive Management”, in: Environmental Values 10: 473–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Norton, B.G. (1988). “The constancy of Aldo Leopold’s land ethic”, in: Conservation Biology 2: 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Norton, B.G. (1990). “Context and hierarchy in Aldo Leopold’s theory of environmental management”, In: Ecological Economics 2: 119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Norton, B.G. (1991). Toward Unity Among Environmentalists. New York: Oxford University Press. Quine, W.V. (1960). Word and Object. Cambridge: MIT University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Quine. W.V. (1961). “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”, in: From A Logical Point of View. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bryan G. Norton

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations