Advertisement

Abstract

Pragmatism writ large - a banner that unites philosophers as diverse as Wittgenstein, Foucault, Rorty, and Latour - aims to help us unlearn the metaphysics and epistemologies of the past by re-describing age-old philosophical obsessions in down-to-earth, pragmatic terms. Heterogeneity, contexts and historical contingency are stressed. Like homeopaths, pragmatists prescribe a medicine that contains infinitely small doses of philosophy to cure us from dreadful philosophical diseases. Their drug has proven strong effects. Under the weight of historical contingencies, all that was solid in philosophy - foundationalism, essentialism, dualistic thinking - melts into air.

Keywords

Alzheimer Disease Medical Ethic Power Relation Clinical Medicine Medical Knowledge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alzheimer, A. (1987). “Über eine eigenartige Erkrankung der Hirnrinde”, in: K. Bick et al. (eds.), The Early Story of Alzheimer’s Disease. New York: Rave Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brandom, R.B. (1994). Making It Explicit. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Canguilhem, G. (1978). On the Normal and the Pathological. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davidson, D. (1984). “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme”, in: D. Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dillmann, R. (1990). Alzheimer’s Disease — The Concept of Disease and the Construction of Medical Knowledge. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Dreyfus, H.L. and P. Rabinow (1982). Michel Foucault — Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Foucault, M. (1966). Les mots et les choses. Paris: NRF-Gallimard.Google Scholar
  8. Foucault, M. (1973). The Birth of the Clinic. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, M. (1994). Dits et Ecrits 1954–1988. Paris: NRF-Gallimard.Google Scholar
  10. Hirschman, A.O. (1970). Exit, Voice,and Loyalty. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Horstman, K., G. de Vries and O. Haveman (2000). Gezondheidspolitiek in een risicocultuur. Den Haag: Rathenau Instituut.Google Scholar
  12. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s Hope. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Morison-Bogorod, M., et al. (1977). “Alzheimer Disease Comes of Age”, in: JAMA 277(10): 837 ff. Popper, K.R. (1970). “Normal Science and its Dangers”, in: I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Reiser, S.J. et al. (eds.) (1977). Ethics in Medicine. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and Social Hope. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  16. Weber, M. (1968). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftstheorie. Tübingen: J.B.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
  17. Westbrook, R.B. (1991). John Dewey and American Democracy. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Wittgenstein, L. (1969). Philosophische Untersuchungen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerard De Vries

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations