Skip to main content

Group Effects in Laboratory Work

Insights from an ethnography of a federal Indian R&D project group

  • Chapter
Scientific Research Effectiveness

Abstract

Project groups have become an important means by which R&D organizations conduct their research. Scholars in organization studies note that for the effective conduct of research and development (R&D), decentralization of authority and an emphasis on interpersonal processes are better suited than a bureaucratic form of organization involving authority, structure, and division of labor. The primary purport of this report is to furnish empirical corroboration of this, through an ethnography of an R&D project group in an Indian federal organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andrews, F.M. (Ed.). (1979a). Scientificproductivity: The effectiveness of research groups in six countries. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, F.M. (1979b). The International Study: Its data sources and measurement procedures. In F.M. Andrews (Ed), Scientific productivity: The effectiveness of research groups in six countries: 17-52. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A., Bresnen, M., Beardsworth, A., & Keil, T. (1988). Qualitative research and the study of leadership. Human Relations, 41: 13-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubinskas, F.A. (Ed.). (1988). Making time: Ethnographies of high-technology organizations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frake, C.O. (1964). A structural description of Subanun religious behaviour. In W. Katz, R., & Allen, T.J. 1985. Project performance and the locus of influence in the R&D matrix. Academy of Management Journal,28: 67-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, R.T. (1986). Predictors of the performance of project groups in R&D organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29: 715-726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouly, V.S. (1995). Effective in-house R&D in an Indian company. In A.K. Srivastav, M.P. Chowdiah, & K.B. Akhilesh (Eds.), R&D Management: 220-233. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouly, V.S., & Sankaran, J.K. (1997). On the study of settings marked by severe superior-subordinate conflict. Organization Studies, 18:175-192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouly, V.S., & Sankaran, J.K. (1999a). R&D funding in India: An empirical study. Prometheus, 17: 21-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouly, V.S., & Sankaran, J.K. (1999b). Project administration by Indian federal R&D agencies: A report. SRA (Society of Research Administrators) Journal, 30(Winter/ Spring): 35-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouly, V.S., Sundaram, C.V., & Ramanna, R. (1996). Evolving appropriate criteria towards effective funding by government agencies, Volumes 1 and 2. Report prepared for the Department of Science & Technology, Government of India. India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1978). The short and glorious history of organizational theory. In J.H. Jackson & C.P. Morgan (Authors), Organization theory: A macro perspective for management. Englewood-Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanday, P.R. (1979). The ethnographic paradigm(s). Administrative Science Quarterly, 24:527-538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, J.P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, J.P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S.J., & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods: the search for meanings(2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (1982). Introduction. In J. Van Maanen (Ed.), Varieties of qualitative research: 11-29. Beverly Hills CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mouly, V.S., Sankaran, J.K. (2003). Group Effects in Laboratory Work. In: Hurley, J. (eds) Scientific Research Effectiveness. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0275-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0275-2_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3961-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0275-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics