Abstract
Project groups have become an important means by which R&D organizations conduct their research. Scholars in organization studies note that for the effective conduct of research and development (R&D), decentralization of authority and an emphasis on interpersonal processes are better suited than a bureaucratic form of organization involving authority, structure, and division of labor. The primary purport of this report is to furnish empirical corroboration of this, through an ethnography of an R&D project group in an Indian federal organization.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andrews, F.M. (Ed.). (1979a). Scientificproductivity: The effectiveness of research groups in six countries. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Andrews, F.M. (1979b). The International Study: Its data sources and measurement procedures. In F.M. Andrews (Ed), Scientific productivity: The effectiveness of research groups in six countries: 17-52. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bryman, A., Bresnen, M., Beardsworth, A., & Keil, T. (1988). Qualitative research and the study of leadership. Human Relations, 41: 13-30.
Dubinskas, F.A. (Ed.). (1988). Making time: Ethnographies of high-technology organizations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Frake, C.O. (1964). A structural description of Subanun religious behaviour. In W. Katz, R., & Allen, T.J. 1985. Project performance and the locus of influence in the R&D matrix. Academy of Management Journal,28: 67-87.
Keller, R.T. (1986). Predictors of the performance of project groups in R&D organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29: 715-726.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Mouly, V.S. (1995). Effective in-house R&D in an Indian company. In A.K. Srivastav, M.P. Chowdiah, & K.B. Akhilesh (Eds.), R&D Management: 220-233. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.
Mouly, V.S., & Sankaran, J.K. (1997). On the study of settings marked by severe superior-subordinate conflict. Organization Studies, 18:175-192.
Mouly, V.S., & Sankaran, J.K. (1999a). R&D funding in India: An empirical study. Prometheus, 17: 21-31.
Mouly, V.S., & Sankaran, J.K. (1999b). Project administration by Indian federal R&D agencies: A report. SRA (Society of Research Administrators) Journal, 30(Winter/ Spring): 35-47.
Mouly, V.S., Sundaram, C.V., & Ramanna, R. (1996). Evolving appropriate criteria towards effective funding by government agencies, Volumes 1 and 2. Report prepared for the Department of Science & Technology, Government of India. India.
Perrow, C. (1978). The short and glorious history of organizational theory. In J.H. Jackson & C.P. Morgan (Authors), Organization theory: A macro perspective for management. Englewood-Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Sanday, P.R. (1979). The ethnographic paradigm(s). Administrative Science Quarterly, 24:527-538.
Spradley, J.P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Spradley, J.P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Taylor, S.J., & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods: the search for meanings(2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Van Maanen, J. (1982). Introduction. In J. Van Maanen (Ed.), Varieties of qualitative research: 11-29. Beverly Hills CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mouly, V.S., Sankaran, J.K. (2003). Group Effects in Laboratory Work. In: Hurley, J. (eds) Scientific Research Effectiveness. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0275-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0275-2_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3961-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0275-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive