Abstract
Current public and philosophical debate concerning the morality of prenatal testing and selective abortion is occurring at the intersection of a number of complex social developments. First and most obviously, the debate is occasioned by developments in medical genetics that make prenatal genetic testing possible. Second and simultaneously, the growing disability rights movement urges that disability be understood not simply as a medical fact, but as a social construction.’ Thus, while developments in genetic technology change the way that various disabling conditions are understood and invite their “geneticization” (Lippman, 1991; Wolf, 1995), the disability rights movement advocates a shift from a strict medical (or genetic) understanding of disability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Asch, A. “Can Aborting Imperfect Children be Immoral?” In Ethical Issues in Modern Medicine, J. Arras, B. Steinbock, eds. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Co., 1995.
Asch, A., Fine, M. “Shared Dreams: A Left Perspective on Disability Rights and Reproductive Rights.” In Women and Disabilities, A. Asch, M. Fine, eds. Philadelphia: University Press, 1988.
Berube, M., Life As We Know It: A Father, and An Exceptional Child, 4th ed. New York: Pantheon Books, 1996.
Botkin J. Fetal privacy and confidentiality. Hastings Center Report 1995; 25(5):32–9
Brock D. The non-identity problem and genetic harms. Bioethics 1995; 9(3/4):269–75
Browne, S.E., Conners, D., Stern, N., eds., With the Power of Each Breath: A Disabled Women’s Anthology. Pittsburgh: Cleis press, 1985.
Buchanan A. Choosing who will be disabled: genetic intervention and the morality of inclusion. Social Philosophy and Policy 1996; 13(2):18–46
Carlson, A.L., Mindful Subjects: Classification and Cognitive Disability. Ph.D. diss., University of Toronto, 1998.
Clarke A. Is non-directive counseling possible? Lancet 1991; 338(8773):998–1001
The Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association. Multiplex genetic testing. Hastings Center Report 1998; 28(4):15–21
Davis, L., ed., The Disability Studies Reader. New York: Routledge,1997.
Edwards S. The moral status of intellectually disabled individuals. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1997; 22(1):29–42
Elkins T, Brown D. Ethical concerns and future direction in maternal screening for Down syndrome. Women’s Health Issues 1995; 5(1):15–20
Gillam L. Prenatal diagnosis and discrimination against the disabled. Journal of Medical Ethics 1999; 25(2):163–71
Kaplan D. Prenatal screening and its impact on persons with disabilities. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 1993; 36(3):605–12
Lakoff, G., Women,Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.
Lane H. Constructions of deafness. Disability and Society 1995; 10(2):171–89
Linton, S., Claiming Disability: Knowledge and Identity. New York: New York University Press, 1998.
Lippman A. Prenatal genetic testing and screening: constructing needs and reinforcing inequities. American Journal of Law and Medicine 1991; 17:15–50
Mitchell, D., Snyder, S., eds., The Body and Physical Differences. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997.
McGee G. Parenting in an era of genetics. Hastings Center Report 1997; 27(2):16–22
Morris, J., Pride and Prejudice: Transforming Attitudes to Disability. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers, 1991.
Oliver, M., The Politics of Disablement. London: Macmilan, 1990.
Parens, E., Asch, A., eds., Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press, 2000.
Paul, D. “Eugenic Anxieties, Social Realities, and Political Choices.” In Are Genes Us? The Social Consequences of the New Genetics, C.F. Cranor, ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1994a.
Paul, D. “Is Human Genetics Disguised Eugenics?” In Genes and Human Self-Knowledge: Historical and Philosophical Reflections on Modern Genetics, R. F. Weir, S.C. Lawrence, E. Fales, eds. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 1994b.
Persson I. Equality and selection for existence. Journal of Medical Ethics 1999; 25(2):130–6
Purdy, L. “Loving Future People.” In Reproduction, Ethics, and the Law: Feminist Perspectives, J. Callahan, ed. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1995.
Purdy L. What can progress in reproductive technology mean for women? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1996; 21(5):499–514
Rothman, B., The Tentative Pregnancy: How Amniocentesis Changes the Experience of Motherhood. New York: Knopf, 1985.
Silvers A. Reconciling equality to difference: caring (f)or justice for people with disabilities. Hypatia 1995; 10:1
Silvers, A. “Formal Justice.” In Disability, Difference,Discrimination: Perspectives on Justice in Bioethics and Public Policy, A. Silvers, D. Wasserman, M. Mahowald, eds. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 1998.
Silvers, A., Wasserman, D., Mahowald, M., Disability,Difference, Discrimination Perspectives on Justice in Bioethics and Public Policy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 1998. Singer, P., Animal Liberation. London: Pimlico, 1995.
Special Supplement. “The Disability Rights Critique of Prenatal Genetic Testing: Reflections and Recommendations.” Hastings Center Report 1999; 29(5)
Steinbock B., McClamrock R. When is birth unfair to the child? Hastings Center Report 1994; 24(6):1521
Trent, J.W., Inventing the Feeble Mind. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.
Tucker B.P. Deaf culture, cochlear implants, and elective disability. Hastings Center Report 1998; 28(4):6–14
Wasserman, D. “Distributive Justice.” In Disability, Difference, Discrimination: Perspectives on Justice in Bioethics and Public Policy„ A. Silvers, D. Wasserman, M. Mahowald, eds. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 1998.
Wendell S. Toward a feminist theory of disability. Hypatia 1989; 4(2):104–25.
Wendell, S., The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Perspectives on Disability. New York: Routledge, 1996.
Wertz D., Fletcher J. Fatal knowledge? Prenatal diagnosis and sex selection. Hastings Center Report 1989; 19(3):21–7
White M.T. Making responsible decisions: an interpretive ethic for genetic decision making. Hastings Center Report 1999; 29(1):14–21
Wolf S.M. Beyond genetic discrimination: toward the broader harm of geneticism. Journal of Law and Medical Ethics 1995; 23(4):345–53.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carlson, L. (2002). The Morality of Prenatal Testing and Selective Abortion: Clarifying the Expressivist Objection. In: Parker, L.S., Ankeny, R.A. (eds) Mutating Concepts, Evolving Disciplines: Genetics, Medicine, and Society. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 75. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0269-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0269-1_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3959-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0269-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive