Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Genetics of Mate Choice: From Sexual Selection to Sexual Isolation pp 383–393Cite as

Female choice in Drosophila: evidence from Hawaii and implications for evolutionary biology

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Contemporary Issues in Genetics and Evolution ((CIGE,volume 9))

Abstract

Details of female choice of mate in Drosophila silvestris of Hawaii strikingly parallels epigamic behavioral systems in many other animals and may be common in other species of Drosophilidae. Females respond selectively to male circling, wing displays, songs and tactile stimulation with foreleg cilia, a quantitative character that is highly variable in some populations. I hypothesize that the female can exert choice based on these cues from individual males that differ genetically by quantitative trait loci. Laboratory tests show that one third of courting males are repeatedly rejected in favor of a minority of ‘alpha’ males. This result imposes non-random mating at the local population level. Past multiple-choice lab tests, widely used to measure ‘isolation’ between pairs of populations or species of Drosophila may be flawed, since random mating has been assumed in the interpretation of results. Pre-mating sexual selection is clearly a powerful intrapopulation force in population biology. This view creates difficulties for discerning any proposed simultaneous interpopulation selective events in the presence of strong female choice. The long-held theory assuming that there is significant selection for pre-mating isolation between groups is questionable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahearn, J.N., H.L. Carson, Th. Dobzhansky & K.Y. Kaneshiro, 1974. Ethological isolation among three species of the planitibia subgroup of Hawaiian Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71:901–903.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, M., 1982. Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 299: 818–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, M., 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boake, C.R.B., 1989. Correlations between courtship success, aggressive success and body size in a picture-winged fly, Droso-phila silvestris. Ethology 80: 318–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boake, C.R.B., 2000. Flying apart: mating behavior and speciation. Bioscience 50: 501–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boake, C.R.B. & A. Hoikkala, 1995. Courtship behavior and mating success of wild-caught Drosophila silvestris males. Anim. Behav. 49: 1303–1313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, H.L., 1978. Speciation and sexual selection in Hawaiian Drosophila, pp. 93–107 in Ecological Genetics: The Interface, edited by P.F. Brussard. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, H.L., 1982. Evolution of Drosophila on the newer Hawaiian volcanoes. Heredity 48: 3–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, H.L., 1983. Chromosomal sequences and interisland colonizations in Hawaiian Drosophila. Genetics 103: 465–482.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, H.L., 1985a. Unification of speciation theory in plants and animals. Syst. Bot. 10: 380–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, H.L., 1985b. Genetic variation in a courtship-related male character in Drosophila silvestris from a single Hawaiian locality. Evolution 39: 678–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, H.L., 1986. Sexual selection and speciation, pp. 391–409 in Evolutionary Processes and Theory, edited by S. Karlin & E. Nevo. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, H.L., 1987. High fitness of heterokaryotypic individuals segregating naturally within a long-standing laboratory population of Drosophila silvestris. Genetics 116: 415–422.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, H.L., 1997. Sexual selection: a driver of genetic change in Hawaiian Drosophila. J. Hered. 88: 343–352.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, H.L., 1990. Evolutionary process as studied in population genetics: clues from phylogeny. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 7: 129–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, H.L., 2000. Sexual selection in populations: the facts require a change in the genetic definition of the species, pp. 495–512 in Evolutionary Genetics from Molecules to Morphology, edited by R.S. Singh & C.B. Krimbas. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, H.L. & P.J. Bryant, 1979. Change in a secondary sexual character as evidence of incipient speciation in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76: 1929–1932.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, H.L. & E.M. Craddock, 1995. Chromosomal inversion polymorphism in two marginal populations of the endemic Hawaiian species Drosophila silvestris. Genet. Sel. Evol. 27: 481–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, H.L. & R. Lande, 1984. Inheritance of a secondary sexual character in Drosophila silvestris. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:6904–6907.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, H.L. & L.T Teramoto, 1984. Artificial selection for a secondary sexual character in males of Drosophila silvestris from Hawaii. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81: 3915–3917.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, H.L., E.C. Val, C.M. Simon & J.W. Archie, 1982. Morphometric evidence for incipient speciation in Drosophila silvestris from the island of Hawaii. Evolution 36: 132–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T.H., F.E. Guinness & S.D. Albon, 1982. Red Deer. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conant, P., 1974. Lek behavior and ecology of two sympatric homosequential Hawaiian Drosophila species, Drosophila heteroneura and Drosophila silvestris. Master’s Thesis, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, 191 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craddock, E.M. & H.L. Carson, 1989. Chromosomal inversion patterning and population differentiation in a young insular species, Drosophila silvestris. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86: 4798–4802.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Craddock, E.M. & W.E. Johnson, 1979. Genetic variation in Hawaiian Drosophila V. Chromosomal and allozymic diversity in Drosophila silvestris and its homosequential species. Evolution 33:137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C., 1874. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London, Murray, 2nd edn.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSalle, R., 1995. Molecular approaches to biogeographic analysis of Hawaiian Drosophilidae, pp. 72–89 in Hawaiian Biogeo-graphy, edited by W.L. Wagner & V.A. Funk. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th., 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard, W.G., 1985. Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard, W.G., 1996. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L. & P.A. Parsons, 1981. Sexual isolation among isofemale strains within a population of Drosophila immigrans. Behav. Genet. 11: 127–133.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, R.R., A. Hoikkala & K.Y. Kaneshiro, 1988. Courtship songs of the picture-winged Drosophila planitibia subgroup species. Science 240: 217–219.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsgard, P.A., 1994. Arena Birds: Sexual Selection and Behavior. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneshiro, K.Y., 1976. Ethological isolation and phylogeny in the planitibia subgroup of Hawaiian Drosophila. Evolution 30: 740–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaneshiro, K.Y., 1983. Sexual selection and direction of evolution in the biosystematics of Hawaiian Drosophilidae. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 28: 161–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaneshiro, K.Y., 1989. Dynamics of sexual selection and founder effects in species formation, pp. 279–296 in Genetics, Speciation and the Founder Principle, edited by L.V Giddings, K.Y. Kaneshiro & W.W. Anderson. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneshiro, K.Y. & J.S. Kurihara, 1981. Sequential differentiation and sexual isolation in populations of Drosophila silvestris. Pac. Sci. 35: 177–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, M., 1987. Sexual selection by female choice in poly-gynous animals. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 43–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korol, A., E. Rashkovetsky, K. Iliadi, P. Michalak, Y. Ronin & E. Nevo, 2000. Non-random mating in Drosophila melanogaster laboratory populations derived from closely adjacent ecologically contrasting slopes at ‘Evolution Canyon’. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 12637–12642.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Markow, T.A., 1980. Rare male advantages among Drosophila of the same laboratory strain. Behav. Genet. 10: 553–555.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Markow, T.A. & S. Sawka, 1992. Dynamics of mating success in experimental groups of Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J. Insect Behav. 5: 375–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E., 1943. Systematics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E., 1946. Experiments on sexual isolation in Drosophila. VII. The nature of isolating mechanisms between Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 32: 128–137.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noor, M.A., 1995. Speciation driven by natural selection. Nature 375: 674–675.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, L., 1980. Mate choice increases a component of offspring fitness in fruit flies. Nature 283: 290–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J.R., 1989. The effects of founder-flush cycles on ethological isolation in laboratory populations of Drosophila, pp. 239–251 in Genetics, Speciation and the Founder Principle, edited by L.V. Giddings, K.Y. Kaneshiro & W.W. Anderson. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J.R., 1997. pp. 562 (p. 265) in Progress and Prospects in Evolutionary Biology. The Drosophila Model. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, P.H., 1979. Future directions in plant population biology, pp. 461–481 in: Topics in Plant Population Biology, edited by O.T. Solbrig, S. Jain, G.B. Johnson & P.H. Raven. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, W.R., 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381: 232–234.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ringo, J.M., 1977. Why 300 species of Hawaiian Drosophila?The sexual selection hypothesis. Evolution 31: 695–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M.J., 1985. The Tungara Frog: A Study in Sexual Selection and Communication. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salceda, V.M. & W.W. Anderson, 1988. Rare male mating advantage in a natural population of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:9870–9874.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, L.W., 2001. Sperm Competition and its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 448 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E.B., 1970. Mating propensity and its genetic basis in Drosophila, pp. 315–379 in Essays on Evolution in Honor of Theodosius Dobzhansky, edited by M. Hecht & W. Steere. Harper and Row, New York

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spieth, H.T., 1966. Courtship behavior of endemic Hawaiian Drosophila. Univ. Texas Publ. 6615: 245–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spieth, H.T., 1978. Courtship patterns and evolution of the Drosophila adiastola and planitibia subgroups. Evolution 32: 435–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spieth, H.D., 1981. Drosophila heteroneura and silvestris:head shapes, behavior and evolution. Evolution 35: 921–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalker, H.D., 1942. Sexual isolation studies in the species complex Drosophila virilis. Genetics 27: 238–257.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C.E. & V. Kekic, 1988. Sexual selection in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 42: 197–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Templeton, A.R., 1996. Experimental evidence for the genetic-transilience model of speciation. Evolution 50: 909–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R. & J. Alcock, 1983. The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, G.F. & M.T. Burrows, 1995. A model of sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 260: 287–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turelli, M., N.H. Barton & J.A. Coyne, 2001. Theory and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 330–343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, W.K. & V.A. Funk, 1995. Hawaiian Biogeography. Evolution on a Hot Spot Archipelago. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard, M.J., 1983. Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Quart. Rev. Biol. 58: 155–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisotzkey, R.G., 1987. Sperm competition in Drosophila silvestris. Master’s Thesis, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, 68 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C.-I., 2001. The genic view of the process of speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 851–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C.-I., H. Hollocher, D.J. Begun, C.F. Aquadro, Y. Xu & M.-L. Wu, 1995. Sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster, a possible case of incipient speciation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 2519–2593.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1960 East-West Road, Honolulu, HI, 96822, USA

    Hampton L. Carson

Authors
  1. Hampton L. Carson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

W. J. Etges M. A. F. Noor

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carson, H.L. (2002). Female choice in Drosophila: evidence from Hawaii and implications for evolutionary biology. In: Etges, W.J., Noor, M.A.F. (eds) Genetics of Mate Choice: From Sexual Selection to Sexual Isolation. Contemporary Issues in Genetics and Evolution, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0265-3_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0265-3_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3958-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0265-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation