Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Variation in female mate choice within guppy populations: Population divergence, multiple ornaments and the maintenance of polymorphism

  • Chapter
Genetics of Mate Choice: From Sexual Selection to Sexual Isolation

Part of the book series: Contemporary Issues in Genetics and Evolution ((CIGE,volume 9))

Abstract

The evolutionary significance of variation in mate choice behaviour is currently a subject of some debate and considerable empirical study. Here, I review recent work on variation within and among guppy (Poecilia reticulata) populations in female mate choice and mating preferences. Empirical results demonstrate that there is substantial variation within and among populations in female responsiveness and choosiness, and much of this variation is genetic. Evidence for variation in preference functions also exists, but this appears to be more equivocal and the relative importance of genetic variation is less clear cut. In the second half of this review I discuss the potential significance of this variation to three important evolutionary issues: the presence of multiple male ornaments, the maintenance of polymorphism and divergence in mate recognition among populations. Studies of genetic variation in mate choice within populations indicate that females have complex, multivariate preferences that are able to evolve independently to some extent. These findings suggest that the presence of multiple male ornaments may be due to multiple female mating preferences. The extreme polymorphism in male guppy colour patterns demands explanation, yet no single satisfactory explanation has yet emerged. I review several old ideas and a few new ones in order to identify the most promising potential explanations for future empirical testing. Among these are negative frequency dependent selection, environmental heterogeneity coupled with gene flow, and genetic constraints. Last, I review the relative extent of within and among-population variation in mate choice and mating preferences in order to assess why guppies have not speciated despite a history of isolation and divergence. I argue that variation within guppy populations in mate choice and enhanced mating success of new immigrants to a pool are major impediments to population divergence of the magnitude that would be required for speciation to occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andersson, M., 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badyaev, A.V., G.E. Hill, P.O. Dunn & J.C. Glen, 2001. Plumage color as a composite trait: developmental and functional integration of sexual ornamentation. Am. Nat. 158: 221–235.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baerends, G.P., R. Brouwer & H.T.J. Waterbolk, 1955. Ethological studies on Lebistes reticulatus (Peters). 1. An analysis of the male courtship pattern. Behaviour 8: 249–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, T.C.M. & A. Pomiankowski, 1995. The genetic basis of female mate preferences. J. Evol. Biol. 8: 129–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, N.H. & M. Turelli, 1989. Evolutionary quantitative genetics: how little do we know. Annu. Rev. Genet. 23: 337–370.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Becher, S.A. & A.E. Magurran, 2000. Gene flow in Trinidadian guppies. J. Fish Biol. 56: 241–249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boake, C.R.B., 1989. Repeatability: its role in evolutionary studies of mating behaviour. Evol. Ecol. 3: 173–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, A.B. & A.C. Kamil, 1998. Apostatic selection by blue jays produces balanced polymorphism in virtual prey. Nature 395: 594–596.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boughman, J.W., 2001. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature 411: 944–947.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Breden, F. & K. Hornaday, 1994. Test of indirect models of selection in the Trinidad guppy. Heredity 73: 291–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R., 1996. Copying and the repeatability of mate choice. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 39: 323–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R., 2000. Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival. Nature 406: 67–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. & N. Caithness, 1995. Female choice in a feral guppy population: are there multiple cues? Anim. Behav. 50: 301–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. & V. Couldridge, 1999. Multiple sexual ornaments co-evolve with multiple mating preferences. Am. Nat. 154: 37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. & J.A. Endler, 2001a. Direct and indirect sexual selection and quantitative genetics of male traits in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 55:1002–1015.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. & J.A. Endler, 2001b. Female guppies agree to differ: phenotypic and genetic variation in mate-choice behaviour and the consequences for sexual selection. Evolution 55: 1644–1655.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crow, R.T. & N.R. Liley, 1979. A sexual pheromone in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata (Peters). Can. J. Zoo. 57: 184–188.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J.A., 1978. A predator’s view of animal colour patterns. Evol. Biol. 11:319–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J.A., 1980. Natural selection on color patterns in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 34: 76–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J.A., 1983. Natural and sexual selection on color patterns in poeciliid fishes. Environ. Biol. Fishes 9: 173–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J.A., 1987. Predation, light intensity and courtship behaviour in Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Anim. Behav. 35:1376–1385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J.A., 1991. Variation in the appearance of guppy color patterns to guppies and their predators under different visual conditions. Vision Res. 31: 587–608.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J.A., 1992. Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am. Nat. 139: S125–S153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J.A., 1993. Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 340: 215–225.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J.A., 1995. Multiple-trait coevolution and environmental gradients in guppies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 22–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J.A. & A. Basolo, 1998. Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 415–420.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J.A. & A.E. Houde, 1995. Geographic variation in female preferences for male traits in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 49: 456–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J.A., D. Westcott, J. Madden & T. Robson, unpub. ms. Innovation and signal efficiency affect the outcome of sexual selection in bowerbirds but elaboration does not.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J.P. & A.E. Magurran, 2000. Multiple benefits of multiple mating in guppies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 10074–10076.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fajen, A. & F. Breden, 1992. Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation among natural populations of the Trinidad guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 46: 1457–1465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D.S. & T.F.C. Mackay, 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman, New York, 4th edn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farr, J.A., 1977. Male rarity or novelty, female choice behaviour, and sexual selection in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata Peters (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Evolution 31: 162–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farr, J.A., 1980. Social behavior patterns as determinants of reproductive success in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata Peters (Pisces: Poeciliidae). An experimental study of the effects of intermale competition, female choice, and sexual selection. Behaviour 74: 38–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farr, J.A. & K. Peters, 1984. The inheritance of quantitative fitness traits in guppies, Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae): tests for inbreeding effects. Heredity 52: 285–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A., 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, S.L., 2001. The Effect of Ambient Light Spectra in Male Mating Strategies and Female Response in the Guppy. The University of New South Wales, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanville, P.W. & J.A. Allen, 1997. Protective polymorphism in populations of computer-simulated moth-like prey. Oikos 80: 565–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godin, J.J. & L.A. Dugatkin, 1995. Variability and repeatability of female mating preference in the guppy. Anim. Behav. 49: 1427–1433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, D.A. & W.H. Cade, 2000. Sexual selection and spe-ciation in field crickets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 14449–14454.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, D.A. & W.H. Cade, 1999. Correlated-response-to-selection experiments designed to test for a genetic correlation between female preferences and male traits yeild biased results. Anim. Behav. 58: 1325–1327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grether, G.F., J. Hudon & D.F. Millie, 1999. Carotenoid limitation of sexual coloration along an environmental gradient in guppies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 266: 1317–1322.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, T. & M. Stamp Dawkins, 1991. Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals. Anim. Behav. 42: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haskins, C.P. & E.F. Haskins, 1961. Polymorphism and population structure in Lebistes reticulatus. pp. 320–395 in Vertebrate Speciation, edited by W.F. Blair. University of Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, A.A., 1999. Is the heritability for courtship and mating speed in Drosophila (fruit fly) low? Heredity 82: 158–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Houde, A.E., 1992. Sex-linked heritability of a sexually selected character in a natural population of Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae) (guppies). Heredity 69: 229–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houde, A.E., 1994. Effect of artificial selection on male colour patterns on mating preference of female guppies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 256: 125–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houde, A.E., 1997. Sex, Color and Mate Choice in Guppies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houde, A.E. & J.A. Endler, 1990. Correlated evolution of female mating preferences and male color patterns in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Science 248: 1405–1408.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, K.A., L. Du, F.H. Rodd & D.N. Reznick, 1999. Familiarity leads to female mate preference for novel males in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Anim. Behav. 58: 907–916.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jennions, M.D. & M. Petrie, 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. Camb. Phil. Soc. 72: 283–327.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, R.A., 1995. Honest advertisement of multiple qualities using multiple signals. J. Theor. Biol. 177: 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, R.A., 1996. Multiple displays in animal communication: ‘backup signals’ and ‘multiple messages’. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 351: 329–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karino, K. & Y. Haijima, 2001. Heritability of male secondary sexual traits in feral guppies in Japan. J. Ethol. 19: 33–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, J.L., J.A. Graves & A.E. Magurran, 1999. Familiarity breeds contempt in guppies. Nature 401: 661.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, C.D., J.-G.J. Godin & J.M. Wright, 1999. Geographical variation in multiple paternity within natural populations of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 266: 2403–2408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, M. & M.J. Ryan, 1991. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350: 33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodric-Brown, A. & P.F. Nicoletto, 1997. Repeatability of female choice in the guppy: response to live and videotaped males. Anim. Behav. 54: 369–376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kotiaho, J.S., L.W. Simmons & J.L. Tomkins, 2001. Towards a resolution of the lek paradox. Nature 410: 684–686.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R., 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78: 3721–3725.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liley, N.R., 1966. Ethological isolating mechanisms in four sympatic species of poeciliid fishes. Behaviour 13(suppl.): 1–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran, A.E., 1998. Population differentiation without speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 353: 275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, I.M. & A.E. Magurran, 2000. Evidence for sperm transfer during sneaky mating in wild Trinidadian guppies. J. Fish Biol. 56: 1381–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J., 1998. Evolutionary Genetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller, A.P. & A. Pomiankowski, 1993. Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32: 167–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, A.J. & P.J. Moore, 1999. Balancing sexual selection through opposing mate choice and male competition. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 266: 711–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panhuis, T.M., R.K. Butlin, M. Zuk & T. Tregenza, 2001. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 325–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, L., 1988. The rare-male effect; what is its evolutionary significance? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 319: 525-539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, L., 1989. Frequency-dependent mating preferences in female fruitflies? Behav. Genet. 19: 725–728.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, L. & W.G. Hill, 1984. Mechanisms for frequency-dependent mating success. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 23: 113–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomiankowski, A. & Y. Iwasa, 1993. Evolution of multiple sexual preferences by Fisher’s runaway process of sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser B 253: 173–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomiankowski, A. & Y Iwasa, 1998. Runaway ornament diversity caused by Fisherian sexual selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:5106–5111.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pomiankowski, A. & A.P. Møller, 1995. A resolution of the lek paradox. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 260: 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomiankowski, A. & L. Sheridan, 1994. Linked sexiness and choosiness. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 242–244.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ptacek, M.B., 2000. The role of mating preferences in sapping interspecific divergence in mating signals in vertebrates. Behav. Process. 51: 111–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodd, F.H., K.A. Hughes, G.F. Grether & C.T. Baril, 2001. A possible non-sexual origin of a mate preference: are male guppies mimicking fruit? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 269: 475–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, C., 1999. Reciever psychology and the evolution of multi-component signals. Anim. Behav. 58: 921–931.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, L. & D. Houle, 1996. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 263: 1415–1421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M.J. & A.S. Rand, 1993. Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution 47: 647–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schluter, D., 2001. Ecology and the origin of species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 325–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, P.W., G.R. Carvalho, B.H. Seghers & A.E. Magurran, 1992. Genetic consequences of an artificial introduction of guppies (Poecilia reticulata) in N. Trinidad. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 248: 111–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E.B. & L. Ehrman, 1978. Rare male mating advantage. Nature 272: 188–189.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P.D. & G.C. Williams, 1982. The lek paradox is not resolved. Theor. Popul. Biol. 22: 392–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widemo, F. & S.A. Sæther, 1999. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 26–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winge, Ö., 1922. A peculiar mode of inheritance and its cytological explanation. J. Genet. 12: 137–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winge, Ö., 1927. The location of eighteen genes in Lebistes reticulatus. J. Genet. 18: 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winge, Ö. & E. Ditlevsen, 1947. Colour inheritance and sex determination in Lebistes. Heredity 1: 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia

    Robert Brooks

Authors
  1. Robert Brooks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

W. J. Etges M. A. F. Noor

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brooks, R. (2002). Variation in female mate choice within guppy populations: Population divergence, multiple ornaments and the maintenance of polymorphism. In: Etges, W.J., Noor, M.A.F. (eds) Genetics of Mate Choice: From Sexual Selection to Sexual Isolation. Contemporary Issues in Genetics and Evolution, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0265-3_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0265-3_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3958-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0265-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation