Skip to main content

Dimensions of Globalization: Cultural and Institutional Novelties, Ethical Needs

  • Chapter
  • 130 Accesses

Part of the book series: Social Indicators Research Series ((SINS,volume 13))

Abstract

Globalization has become a buzzword for the social sciences. Nonetheless this concept has a dual problem: on the one hand its definition lacks precision, on the other it is, mostly, devoid of any moral or ethical prescriptions. These problems are intertwined and help to explain conflict regarding the goals, processes and effects of globalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Abu-Lughod, Janet. 1989.Before European Hegemony.Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, Arjun. 1990. “Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy.”Theory Culture And Society7, pp. 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belloc, Hilaire. 1912.The Servile State.London: T.N. Foulis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James M. 1975.The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbach, Roger et al. 2001.Globalization and Postmodern Politics: From Zapatistas to High-Tech Robber Barons.London: Arawak Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesterton, Gilbert Keith. 1910.What’s Wrong with the World.London: Cassell and Co. Cohn, Theodore H. 2000.Global Political Economy: Theory and Practice.New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, Alzina Stone. 1982.The Outline of Sanity: A Biography of G.K. Chesterton.Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elazar, Daniel Judah. 1998.Constitutionalizing Globalization: The Postmodern Revival of Confederal Arrangements.Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, Mike. 1990. “Global Culture: An Introduction.”Theory Culture And Society 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, Mike. 1995.Undoing Culture: Globalization Postmoderism and Identity. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, David P. 1986.Morals by Agreement.Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, David P. 1990.Moral Dealing: Contract Ethics and Reason. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, David P., and Robert Sugden, eds. 1993.Rationality Justice and the Social Contract: Themes from Morals by Agreement. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Giddens, Anthony. 1991.The Consequences Of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottdiener, Mark. 1995.Postmodern Semiotics: Material Culture and the Forms of Postmodern Life.Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronbacher, Gregory. 1998. “The Need for Economic Personalism.”Journal of Markets and Morality1, no. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronbacher, Gregory. 1999. “The Humane Economy: Neither Right nor Left. A Response to Daniel Finn.”Journal of Markets and Morality2, no. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. 1989.The Condition of Postmodernity.London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. B. 1962.The Road to Serfdom.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazlitt, Henry. 1964.The Foundations of Morality.New York: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, David. 1995.Democracy and the Global Order.Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, David, and Anthony McGrew. 1999. “Global Transformations.”Re Visions22, no. 2, pp. 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, David, Anthony McGrew, D. Goldblatt, and J. Perraton. 2000. “Rethinking Globalization.” In David Held, and Anthony McGrew (eds.)The Global Transformation Reader.Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P., and G. Thompson. 1996.Globalization in Question: The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance.Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, H.K. 1984.Networks of Interdependence.Second Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. 1991.Postmodernism or,the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham, Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. 1995.At Home in The Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity.New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, Erin, ed. 2001.Justice as Fairness: A Restatement.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, K., 1994.Out of Control: The New Biology of Machines Social Systems,and the Economic World. New York: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, Clive. 2000. “Globalization: Another False Universalism?”Third World Quarterly21, no. 6, pp. 931–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindholm, Charles. 1997. “Logical and Moral Dilemmas of Postmodernism.”Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute3, no. 4, pp. 747–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund, Brian. 1996. “Robert Nozick and the Politics of Social Welfare.”Political Studies44, no. 1, pp. 115–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mounier, Emmanuel. 1970. [1952]Personalism.Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T., 1986.The View from Nowhere.New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, Patrick. 2000. “Three Readings of Political Liberalism: Rawls, Maritain, and Crick.”Journal of Political Ideologies5, no. 2, pp. 225--246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, Michael. 1982.The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism.New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, Michael. 1993.The Catholic Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism.New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Boyle, Edward J. 1998.Personalist Economics: Moral Convictions Economic Realities and Social Action. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke, K.H., and J.G. Williamson. 1999.Globalization and History The Evolution of a Nineteenth Century Atlantic Economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1993.Political Liberalism.New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1999.A Theory Of Justice.Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, R. 1992.Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture.London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rush Finn, Daniel. 1999. “The Economic Personalism of John Paul II: Neither Right nor Left.”Journal of Markets and Morality2, no. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarup, Madan. 1993.An Introductory Guide to Post-Structuralism and Postmodernism.Atlanta: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklair, Leslie. 1999. “Competing Concepts of Globalization.”Journal of World-Systems Research5, no. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, T.H. 1989.An Introduction to the World-Systems Perspective.Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shweder, R. 1984. “Anthropology’s Romantic Rebellion Against the Enlightenment: or There’s More to Thinking than Reason and Evidence.” In Shweder, R., and Levine R. eds.Culture Theory: Essays on Mind.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shweder, R. ed. 1991Thinking Through Cultures: Expeditions in Cultural Psychology.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strike, Kenneth A. 2000. “Liberalism, Communitarianism and the Space Between: In Praise of Kindness.”Journal of Moral Education29, no. 2, pp. 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Robert Murray. 1997.Moral Development Theories - Secular and Religious: A Comparative Study.Westport: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torek, Paul. 1994. “Liberties, Not Rights: Gauthier and Nozick on Property.”Social Theory and Practice20, no. 3, pp. 343–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesley, John. 1999 [Feb. 17, 1744]. “The Use Of Money.” Wesley Center for Applied

    Google Scholar 

  • Theology: Wesley Center at Northwest Nazarene University, Nampa, ID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wojtyla, Karol. 1975. “Rodzicielstow’aCommunis Persona rum[Parenthood and the

    Google Scholar 

  • Communis Personarum].“ Ateneum Kaplanokie84, no. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyschogrod, Edith. 1990.Saints and Postmodernism: Revisioning Moral Philosophy.Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Migone, A. (2002). Dimensions of Globalization: Cultural and Institutional Novelties, Ethical Needs. In: McBride, S., Dobuzinskis, L., Cohen, M.G., Busumtwi-Sam, J. (eds) Global Instability. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0251-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0251-6_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3947-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0251-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics