Advertisement

Information Technology and Environmental Data Management

  • M. A. Santos
  • A. Rodrigues
Part of the Nato Science Series book series (NAIV, volume 23)

Abstract

Over the last two decades, environmental data have increasingly received more attention, as they play a key role in planning and operational management. At the sane time, the way data-related issues are being approached has been changing with the years. Firstly, the rising awareness on environmental problems presses governmental and non-governmental agencies to increase monitoring. At the same time, the growing use of simulation and optimization models to better understand environmental phenomena requires higher data volumes to calibrate and validate these models. Secondly, although modern sensor technology has made data collection far easier and bulkier than in the past, currently used digital forms of data capture, such as remote sensing, image processing, digital photography and GPS (global positioning systems), have brought in new types of data with different requirements for archiving and analysis. Thirdly, the recent trend for a multidisciplinary approach to environmental problems has made data integration an important issue. Finally, institutional and non-institutional data producers increasingly feel the need or are obliged to make their data available to students, researchers, or the general public. These aspects call for better and widely spread data collection and archiving, and for easier access to data and information. Data classification and analysis are two further aspects that require some consideration.

Keywords

Estuary River Environmental Data Integrate Technology Digital Photography Modern Sensor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anthony, R. (1965)Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for AnalysisBoston USA, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Santos, M.A. (1991)Decision Support Systems in Water Resources, Research program prepared as partial fulfillment of the requirements for obtaining the rank of Principal Research OfficerLisbon, Portugal, INFO. 152 p.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smeets, E. and Weterings, R. (1999)Environmental Indicators: Typology and OverviewCopenhagen, Denmark, European Environment Agency, 19p.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    EEA (2001)Environmental Signals 2001Denmark, European Environmental Agency, 113p.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leibundgut, C., McDonnell, J., and Schultz, G. (eds.) (1999)Integrated Methods in Catchment Hydrology-Tracer, Remote Sensing, and new Hydrometric Techniques, IAHS Publication no. 258IAHS Press, Wallingford (UK), 284p.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    EC (2000)Directive 2000/60/ECOfficial Journal L 327, 22/12/2000 pp 0001–72.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    lemon, W.H. (1996)Building the Data WarehouseNew York, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lang, A. and Manea, A. (1994) BRECHE project of hydrological database for ERB: Modeling of data series, in P. Seuna, A. Gustard, N.W. Arnell, and G.A. Cole (eds.)FRIEND: Flow Regimes from International Experimental and Nehvork DataProceedings of the Braunschweig Conference, October 1993, IAHS Publication no. 221, Wallingford (UK), IAHS Press, pp 21–31.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Manea, A. (1997) Adequate DBMS toolsin FRIEND: Flow Regimes from International Experimental and Network Data, Third report: 1994–1997, Paris, France, Cemagref, pp 38–42.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Breil, P. (1997) Data selected for the AMHY database, inFRIEND: Flow Regimes from International Experimental and Network Data Third report: 1994–1997Paris, France, Cemagref, pp 43–44.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rodrigues, A. (1998) The importance of metadata within GI hnfrastructuresProceedings of the Workshop on Challenges and Future Developments of GI Infrastructures: The Portuguese ExperienceFirst International Conference and Exhibition on Geographic Information (GIS Planet’98), Lisbon, Portugal, 8 September.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Valenzuela, C.R. (1991)Basic principles of GISin A.S. Belward and C.R. Valenzuela (eds.),Remote Sensing and GIS Resource Management in Developing CountriesKluwer Academic Publishers, London, pp. 279–295.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scholten, H.J. and LoCascio A. (1997) GIS application research: History, trends and developments, Paper presented at theESF GISDATA Final Conference on Geographical Information Research at the MillenniumLe Bischenberg, France 13–17 September, (http://shefac.ukluni/academic/D-H/gislkey3.html).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Laurini, R. (1997) Novel technological for the management of located and mobile information and intelligence, Paper presented at the ESF GISDATA Final Conference on Geographical Information Research at the Millennium, Le Bischenberg, France 13–17 September, (http://shef.ac.uk/uni/academic/DH/vis/Iaurini.html).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hooper. R.P. and Aulenbach, B.T. (1993) Managing the data explosionCivil Engineering63(5), 74–76.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Han, J. and Kamber, M. (2001)Data Mining: Concepts and TechniquesThe Morgan Kaufmann Series in Data Management Systems, Academic Press, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, SanDiego, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Koperski, K. and Han, J. (1995) Discoveryof spatial association rules in geographic information databases Proceedings of the International Symposium on Large Spatial DatabasesPortland, Maine (USA), Aug. 6–9. 1995, pp. 47–66.Google Scholar
  18. I8.
    Knorr, E.M. and Ng. R.T. (1996) Finding aggregate proximity relationships and commonalities is spatial data miningIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering8(6), 884–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Koperski, K., I-Ian, J., and Stefanovic, N. (1998)An efficient two-step method for classification of spatial data Proceedings of the International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling SD/ 1’98Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 1998, pp. 45–54.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wachowicz, M. (2000) How can knowledge discovery methods uncover spatial-temporal patterns in environmental data, in B.V. Dasarathy (ed.)Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery: Theory Tools and Technology II Proceedings of the SPIE 2000 Conference, pp 221–229.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wachowicz, M. (to appear) A knowledge construction process for uncovering spatial-temporal patterns, Paper submitted to the Water Resources Management Journal Spatial Issue on Geoinformatics.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zaiane, O.R., Han, J., Li, Z-N., and Hou, J. (1998)Mining multimedia data Proceedings ofCASCON’98: Meeting of MindsToronto, Canada, November 1998.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Koperski, K., Han, J., and Adhikary, J. (1999)Mining Knowledge in Geographic Data, Comm. ACM.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. Santos
    • 1
  • A. Rodrigues
    • 1
  1. 1.Civil Engineering National LaboratoryLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations