Advertisement

Optimization of Passive and Active Dynamic Systems

  • D. Bestle
  • M. Glora
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NAII, volume 103)

Abstract

The multibody system approach is widely accepted as an analysis tool for kinematic and kinetic investigation of rigid body systems connected by rigid frictionless bearings and massless coupling elements. Due to the specific structure of the equations of motion, they may easily be coupled with additional differential equations describing the dynamics of active coupling elements like pneumatic or hydraulic actuators, electric motors, or general control laws. Especially in the context of active system design, a coupling of the multibody system approach with high-level simulation software like Matlab/Simulink [1] shows quite some overall design capability although the performance of a single simulation run may be less than for specific numerical integration algorithms. However, the use of such a model in the context of virtual prototyping is often restricted to user-driven parameter studies whereas the design capability for a more systematic synthesis is overlooked.

Keywords

Torsional Vibration Virtual Prototype Tuned Mass Damper Hydraulic Actuator Target Speed 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    MATLAB, The Language of Technical Computing (2000). The Math-Works Inc, Natick.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Glora, M. (2001)Ein Beitrag zur Mehrkriterienoptimierung von Simulationsmodellen und ExperimentenShaker, Aachen.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bestie, D. (1994)Analyse und Optimierung von Mehrkörpersystemen, Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fletcher, R. (1987)Practical methods of optimizationWiley, Chichester.MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Osyczka, A. (1984)Multicriteria optimization in engineeringEllis Horwood, New York.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hwang, Ch.-L.; Masud, A.S. (1979)Multiple objective decision making - Methods and applicationsLect. Notes in Economics and Math. Sys., Vol. 164, Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ControlDesk - Experiment guide(2002), dSpace GmbH, Paderborn.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Golub, G.H.; van Loan, F. (1986)Matrix computationsNorth Oxford Academic Publ., London.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    . Maple 8(2002) Waterloo Maple Inc., Waterloo.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Griewank, A. (1991) Evaluating Derivatives, SIAM, Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Bestle
    • 1
  • M. Glora
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Machine DynamicsBrandenburg University of TechnologyCottbusGermany

Personalised recommendations