Skip to main content

Dependency-Based Evaluation of Minipar

  • Chapter
Treebanks

Part of the book series: Text, Speech and Language Technology ((TLTB,volume 20))

Abstract

In this paper, we first present a dependency-based method for parser evaluation. We then use the method to evaluate a broad-coverage parser, called MINIPAR, with the SUSANNE corpus. The method allows us to evaluate not only the overall performance of the parser, but also its performance with respect to different grammatical relationships and phenomena. The evaluation results show that MINIPAR is able to cover about 79% of the dependency relationships in the SUSANNE corpus with about 89% precision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bömová, A., Hajič, J., Hajicová, E., Hladká, B. (2003). The Prague Dependency Treebank: A Three level Annotation Scenario. In Abeillé, Anne (ed.) Treebanks: Building and Using Syntactically Annotated Corpora, Kluwer Academic Publishers, this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berwick, R. C., S. P. Abney, C. Tenny (eds.) (1991). Principle-Based Parsing: Computation and Psycholinguistics. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, E., S. Abney, D. Flickenger, C. Gdaniec, R. Grishman, P. Harrison, D. Hindle, R. Ingria, F. Jelinek, J. Klavans, M. Liberman, M. Marcus, S. Roukos, B. Santorini, T. Strzalkowski (1991). A Procedure for Quantitatively Comparing the Syntactic Coverage of English Grammars. Proceedings of Speech and Natural Language Workshop, p. 306–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J., G. Minnen, T. Briscoe (1999). Corpus Annotation for Parser Evaluation. Proceedings of the EACL Workshop on Linguistically Interpreted Corpora. Bergen, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, M. J. (1996). ‘A New Statistical Parser Based on Bigram Lexical Dependencies’. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Santa Cruz, CA, p. 184–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, M. J. (1997). Three Generative, Lexicalized Models for Statistical Parsing. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Madrid, Spain, p. 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, D. (1964). Dependency theory: a formalism and some observations. Language 40, p. 511–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, R. (1984). Word Grammar. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell Publishers Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, D. (1993). Principle-based Parsing without Overgeneration. Proceedings of ACL-93. Columbus, Ohio, pp. 112–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, D. (1994) PRINCIPAR—An Efficient, Broad-coverage, Principle-based Parser. Proceedings of COLING-94. Kyoto, Japan: p. 482–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, D. (1995) A Dependency-based Method for Evaluating Broad-coverage Parsers. Proceedings of IJCAI-95. Montreal, Canada, p. 1420–1425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, D. (1998). A Dependency-based Method for Evaluating Broad-Coverage Parsers. Journal of Natural Language Engineering, p. 97–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magerman, D. (1995). Statistical Decision-Tree Model for Parsing. Proceedings of ACL-96. Cambridge, MA, p. 276–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, M. P., B. Santorini, M. A. Marcinkiewicz (1993). Building a large annotated corpus of English: the Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics 19(2), p. 313–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mel’čuk, I. A. (1987). Dependency syntax: theory and practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A., R. Beckwith, C. Fellbaum, D. Gross, K. J. Miller (1990). ‘Introduction to WordNet: An on-line lexical database’. International Journal of Lexicography 3(4), p. 235–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, G. (2003). Thoughts on two decades of drawing trees. This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, G. R. (1995). English for the Computer. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lin, D. (2003). Dependency-Based Evaluation of Minipar. In: Abeillé, A. (eds) Treebanks. Text, Speech and Language Technology, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0201-1_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0201-1_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1335-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0201-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics