Abstract
Strolling east along the splendid swath of Constitution Avenue, beyond the recessed lawns of the White House, diagonally across from the back entrance to the National Gallery of Art, the visitor to Washington, D.C. will be drawn to a building whose soaring Corinthian columns signal the presence of something exceptional within. Inside, under the hushed central rotunda of the National Archives of the United States, the nowcurious visitor may take her place in the slow-moving line of tourists for a brief glimpse of the three documents that anchor the American state: the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Declaration of Independence. Encased in thick, greenish, helium-filled, bronze and glass frames, elevated on a marble pedestal, the faded parchments are barely readable in the dim, protective light. It is hard to linger long enough to decipher the script; the guards take care to keep the line moving. But the entire setting — the heroic murals,1 the sober display cases around the circular gallery, the inlaid floor and monumental architecture — encourages a feeling of reverence. This is no ordinary public space; it is the closest thing to a holy of holies in this brashly populist, secular republic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ackerman, Bruce A. (1983), Reconstructing American Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ackerman, Bruce A. (1991), We The People: Foundations, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ackerman, Bruce A. (1998), We The People: Transformations, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Anderson, Benedict (1991 [1983]), Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Revised and expanded edition, London: Verso.
Anderson, Benedict (1994), ‘Exodus’, Critical Inquiry 20: 314–27.
Bartlett, Katherine T. (1990), ‘Feminist legal methods’, Harvard Law Review 103: 829–88.
Bauman, Zygmunt (1991), Modernity and Ambivalence, Cambridge: Polity.
Beck, Ulrich (1992 [ 1986]), Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage Publications.
Bijker, Wiebe, Thomas P. Hughes and Trevor Pinch (1987), The Social Construction of Technological Systems, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bimber, Bruce (1996), The Politics of Expertise in Congress, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Boyle, James (1996), Shamans, Software and Spleens: Law and the Construction of the Information Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bowker, Geoffrey C. and Susan Leigh Star (1999), Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Breyer, Stephen (1993), Breaking the Vicious Circle: Toward Effective Risk Regulation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Callon, Michel (1986), ‘Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay’, in J. Law (ed.), Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, London: Routledge & Keagan Paul, pp. 196–233.
Callon, Michel (1987), ‘Society in the making: The study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis’, in W. Bijker, T. Hughes and T. Pinch (eds.), The Social Construction of “Technological Systems, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 83–103.
Callon, Michel (1999), ‘The role of lay people in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge’, Science, Technology and Society 4 (1): 81–94
Cambrosio, Alberto, Peter Keating and Michael Mackenzie (1990), ‘Scientific practice in the courtroom: The construction of sociotechnical identities in a biotechnology patent dispute’, Social Problems 37: 275–93.
Carson, John (1993), ‘Army alpha, army brass, and the search for army intelligence’, Isis 84: 278–309.
Cohn, Bernard S. (1996), Colonialism and Its forms of Knowledge, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Daemmrich, Arthur (1998), ‘The evidence does not speak for itself: Expert witnesses and the organization of DNA-typing companies’, Social Studies of Science 28: 741–72.
Darman, Richard G. (1978), The law of the sea: Rethinking U.S. interests’, Foreign Affairs 56 (2): 381.
Dickson, David (1984), The New Politics of Science, New York: Pantheon Books.
Eder, Klaus and Catherine Kantner (2000), ‘Nationale Resonanzstrukturen in Europa: Eine Kritik der Rede vom Öffentlichkeitsdefizit’, in M. Bach (ed.), Die Europäisierung nationaler Gesellschaften, Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, 306–31.
Ezrahi, Yaron (1990), The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fisher, William W. III, Morton J. Horwitz and Thomas A. Reed (eds.) (1993), American Legal Realism, New York: Oxford University Press.
Foster, Kenneth R. and Peter W. Huber (1997), Judging Science: Scientific Knowledge and the Federal Courts, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Foucault, Michel (1971 [1966]), The Order of Things: An Archaeology ofthe Human Sciences, New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, Michel (1979), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, New York: Random House.
Fried, Barbara (1998), The Progressive Assault on Laissez Faire: Robert Hale and the First Law and Economics Movement, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Friedman, Thomas L. (1999), The Lexus and the Olive Tree, New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux
Fukuyama, Francis (1992), The End of History and the Last Man, New York: Free Press.
Fyfe, Gordon and John Law (eds.) (1988), Picturing Power: Visual Depiction and Social relations, London: Routledge.
Gaskell, George, Martin W. Bauer, John Durant and N.C. Allum (1999), ‘Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U.S.’, Science 285: 384–7.
Gavaghan, Helen (1999), ‘Britain struggles to turn anti-GM tide’, Science 284: 1442–4.
Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott and Martin Trow (1994), The New Production of Knowledge, London: Sage Publications.
Giddens, Anthony (1991), Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Cambridge: Polity.
Goldberg, Carey (1996), ‘Shunning “he” and “she,” they fight for respect’, New York Times, September 8, Section 1:24.
Goldberg, Steven (1994), Culture Clash, New York: New York University Press.
Goldmann, Kjell (2001), Transforming the European Nation-State, London: Sage Publications.
Grimm, Dieter (1995), ‘Does Europe need a constitution?’, European Law Journal 1 (3): 282–302.
Guha, Ranajit and Gayatri Spivak (ed.) (1988), Selected Subaltern Studies, New York: Oxford University Press.
Haas, Peter M. (1990), Saving the Mediterranean: The Politics of International Environmental Cooperation, New York: Columbia University Press.
Habermas, Juergen (1975 [1973]), Legitimation Crisis, Boston: Beacon Press.
Hacking, Ian (1983), Representing and Intervening, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Haraway, Donna (1991), Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, New York, NY: Routledge, Chapman, and Hall.
Haraway, Donna (1997), Modest-Witness@Second-Millennium. FemaleMan-Meets-Oncomouse: Feminism and Technoscience, New York: Routledge.
Hardt, Michael and Antonio Negri (2000), Empire, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Huber, Peter W. (1991), Galileo’s Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom, New York: Basic Books.
Hughes, Thomas P. (1983), Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Huxley, Aldous (1946), Brave New World, London: Harper & Brothers.
Ignatieff, Michael (1997), The Warrior’s Honor, Toronto: Viking.
Jasanoff, Sheila (1998a), ‘The eye of everyman: Witnessing DNA in the Simpson trial’, Social Studies of Science 28 (5-6): 713–40.
Jasanoff, Sheila (1998b), ‘Expert games in silicone gel breast implant litigation’, in M. Freeman and H. Reece (eds.), Science in Court, London: Dartmouth, pp. 83–107.
Jasanoff, Sheila (1995a), Science at the Bar: Law, Science, and Technology in America, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jasanoff, Sheila (1995b), ‘Product, process, or programme: Three cultures and the regulation of biotechnology’, in M. Bauer (ed.), Resistance to New Technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 311–31.
Jasanoff, Sheila (2001), ‘Election 2000: Mechanical error or system failure?’, Social Studies of Science 31 (3): 461–7.
Jasanoff, Sheila, Gerald Markle, James Petersen and Trevor Pinch (eds.) (1995), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Joss, Simon and John Durant (1995), Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe, London: Science Museum.
Kairys, David (ed.) (1990), The Politics of Law, New York: Pantheon.
Keck, Margaret E. and Kathryn Sikkink(1998), Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Network in International Politics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Kelman, Mark (1987), A Guide to Critical Legal Studies, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Keyssar, Alexander (2000), The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States, New York: Basic Books.
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Latour, Bruno (1983), ‘Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world’, in K. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay (eds.), Science Observed, London: Sage, pp. 141–70
Latour, Bruno (1987), Science in Action, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno (1988), The Pasteurization of France, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno (1990), ‘Drawing things together’, in M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (eds.), Representation in Scientific Practice, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 19–68.
Latour, Bruno (1993), We Have Never Been Modern, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno and Steve Woolgar (1979), Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lessig, Lawrence (1997), ‘Constitution of code: Limitations on choice-based critiques of cyberspace regulation’, CommLaw Conspectus 5: 181–204.
Lewin, Tamar (2001), ‘In genetic testing for paternity, law often lags behind science’, New York Times, March 11, Section 1,1.
MacKenzie, Donald (1990), Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marris, Claire and Pierre-Benoit Joly (1999), ‘Between consensus and citizens: public participation in technology assessment in France’, Science Studies 12 (2): 3–32.
Masood, Ehsan(1999), ‘Gag on food scientist is lifted as gene modification row hots up….’, Nature 397: 547.
Miller, Clark and Paul Edwards (eds.) (2001), Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mol, Annemarie and John Law (1994), ‘Regions, networks and fluids: Anaemia and social topology’, Social Studies of Science 24: 641–71.
Nowotny, Helga (2001), Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.
Nye, Joseph S., Jr., Philip D. Zelikow and David C. King (eds.) (1997), Why People Don’t Trust Government, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ogburn, William Fielding (1922), Social Change with Respect to Culture and Original Nature, New York: B.W. Huebsch.
Porter, Theodore M. (1995), Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ratner, Sidney, James H. Soltow and Richard Sylla (1979), The Evolution of the American Economy, New York: Basic Books.
Reardon, Jennifer (2001), ‘The human genome diversity project: A failure to coproduce natural and social order’, Social Studies of Science 31: 357–88.
Sandel, Michael J. (1996), Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sassen, Saskia (1991), The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schauer, Frederick (1998), ‘Internet privacy and the public-private distinction’, Jurimetrics 38: 555–64.
Schuck, Peter (1993), ‘Multi-culturalism redux: Science, law, and politics’, Yale Law and Policy Review 11: 1–46.
Scott, James C. (1998), Seeing Like a State, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Service, Robert F. (1998), ‘Seed-sterilizing “terminator technology” sows discord’, Science 282: 850–1.
Shapin, Steven (1994), A Social History of Truth, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Shapin, Steven and Simon Schaffer (1985), Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,.
Shiva, Vandana (1993), Monocultures of the Mind: Perspectives on Biodiversity and Biotechnology, London: Third World Network.
Shiva, Vandana (1997), Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge, Toronto: Between The Lines.
Smaglik, Paul (2000), ‘Tissue donors use their influence in deal over gene patent terms’, Nature 408: 894–6.
Smith, Merritt Roe and Leo Marx (eds.) (1994), Does Technology Drive History? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Smith, Roger and Brian Wynne (eds.) (1989), Expert Evidence: Interpreting Science in the Law, London: Routledge.
Stone, Christopher D. (1974), Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects, Los Altos, CA: William Kaufmann.
Storey, William (1997), Science and Power in Colonial Mauritius, Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Sunstein, Cass (1993), The Partial Constitution, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tribe, Laurence H. (1978), American Constitutional Law, Mineola, NY: Foundation Press.
Visvanathan, Shiv (1997), Carnival for Science: Essays on Science, Technology and Development, Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Walker, Neil (1996), ‘European constitutionalism and European integration’, Public Law Summer 1996:266–9
Wynne, Brian (1982), Rationality and Ritual: The Windscale Inquiry and Nuclear Decisions in Britain, Chal-font St. Giles, UK: British Society for the History of Science
Wynne, Brian (1988), ‘Unruly technology’, Social Studies of Science 18: 147–167.
Wynne, Brian (1989), ‘Frameworks of rationality in risk management: Towards the testing of naive sociology’, in J. Brown (ed.), Environmental Threats: Social Sciences Approaches to Public Risk Perceptions, London: Belhaven, pp. 33–45.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jasanoff, S. (2003). In a Constitutional Moment: Science and Social Order at the Millennium. In: Joerges, B., Nowotny, H. (eds) Social Studies of Science and Technology: Looking Back, Ahead. Sociology of the Sciences, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0185-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0185-4_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1482-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0185-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive