Skip to main content

Reflections on the Millennium, Calendars, and the Gregorian Hegemony

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Sociology of the Sciences ((SOSC,volume 23))

Abstract

All essays in this volume take their timeframe from the millennium, using year 2000 as a major marker. A few years into the new millennium, the turn of the twentieth century into the twenty-first continues to organize historical memory and foresight, even if the urgency to couch almost everything in terms of this chronology has dwindled and given way to more meaningful markers — not the least, as many have said, the ‘true’ beginning of the new century: September 11, 2001.1

Ideology is the other side of chronology Wolf Lepenies

Even if I failed to take them fully into account, my thanks for critical comments on consecutive versions of this essay go to Helga Nowotny, Richard Rottenburg, Joerg Potthast, Terry Shinn and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arjomand, Said Amir (1998), ‘Islamic Apocalypticism in the Classic Period’, in B. McGinn and S.J. Stein (eds.), Encyclopedia of Apocalypticism, New York: Continuum, Vol. 2, pp. 238–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basnizki, Ludwig (1986), Der jüdische Kalender. Entstehung und Aufbau, Königstein/Ts.: Jüdischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borst, Arno (1991 [1999]), Computus. Zeit und Zahl in der Geschichte Europas, Kleine kulturwissenschaftliche Bibliothek, 28 (letzte überarbeitete Ausgabe dtv 1999), Berlin: Wagenbach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Timothy J. (1998), Farewell to an Idea. Episodes from a history of modernism, New Haven, CON: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elvee, Richard Q. (ed.) (1992), The End of Science?: Attack and Defense (The Nobel Conference Series), Landham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel (1986), ‘Of other spaces’, Diacritics 16: 22–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman and Peter Scott (1994), The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginzel, Friedrich K. (1906-14), Handbuch der mathematischen und technischen Chronologie. Das Zeitrechnungswesen der Völker, 3. Bd., Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen J. (1997), Questioning the Millennium: A Rationalist’ s Guide to a Precisely Arbitrary Countdown, London: Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchins, Christopher (2001), ‘Why the suicide killers chose September 11’, The Guardian, October 3, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, Eric (1995), The Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century 1914-1991, London: Abacus Edition, Little, Brown and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hörning, Karl H., Daniela Ahrens and Anette Gerhard (1999), ‘Do technologies have time?’, Time & Society 8(2): 293–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, John (1996), The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age, Helix Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Thomas P. (1983), Networks of Power, Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Thomas P. (1989), American Genesis. A Century of Invention and Technological Enthusiasm, New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Thomas P. (1998), Rescuing Prometheus, New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joerges, Bernward (1990), ‘“Global 2000” — Social science, ecology, and the bimillennium’, Futures (January/February): 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joerges, Bernward (1994), ‘Ein Zeitalter der Energie’, in W. Zapf und M. Dierkes (eds.), Institutionenvergleich und Institutionendynamik, WZB-Jahrbuch 1994, Berlin: edition sigma, pp. 106–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joerges, Bernward (1999), ‘Do Politics Have Artefacts?’, Social Studies of Science 29(3): 411–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landes, David S. (1983), Revolution in Time: Clocks and the Making of the Modern World, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrain, Jorge (1989), Theories of Development: Capitalism, Colonialism and Dependency, Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebowitz, Stan J. and Stephen E. Margolis (2001), Winners, Losers & Microsoft, Competition and Antitrust in High Technology, Oakland, CA: The Independent Institute, revised edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepenies, Wolf (1999), ‘Das Altern unseres Jahrhunderts’, Tagesspiegel, 19. Juni 1999: 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas (1986), ‘Das Problem der Epochenbildung und die Evolutionstheorie’, in H.U. Gumbrecht and U. Link-Heer (eds.), Epochenschwellen und Epochenstrukturen im Diskurs der Literatur-und Sprachtheorie, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 11–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas (1990), ‘Die Zukunft kann nicht beginnen: Temporalstrukturen der modernen Gesellschaft’, in P. Sloterdijk (ed.), Vor der Jahrtausendwende: Berichte zur Lage der Zukunft, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 119–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, Adrian (2001), ‘The technicity of time: From 1.00 oscillations/sec to 9,192,631,770 HZ’, Time & Society 10(2-3): 235–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddox, John (1998), What Remains to Be Discovered: Mapping the Secrets of the Universe, the Origin of Life, and the Future of the Human Race, New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, Hans (1991), Die Christliche Zeitrechnung, Freiburg: Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, Renate (1993), ‘Groβe Technische Systeme und ihre gesellschaftstheoretische Bedeutung’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 45(1): 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, William (1998), ‘Demography and Urbanization’, in M. Howard and W.R. Louis (eds.), The Oxford History of the Twentieth Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClellan III, James E. and Harold Dorn (1998), Science And Technology In World History: An Introduction, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, Colin (1996), Die Grenzen vernünftigen Fragens. Grundprobleme der Philosophie, Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinzer, Michael (1992), Der Französische Revolutionskalender (1972-1805). Planung, Durchführung und Scheitern einer neuen Zeitrechnung, München: Oldenbourg Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstraβ, Jürgen (1998), Das Undenkbare denken. Über den Umgang mit dem Undenkbaren und Unvorstellbaren in der Wissenschaft, Berlin: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Preprint No. 105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, Helga (1993), Eigenzeit. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, Helga (1997), Time: The Modern and Postmodern Experience, Oxford: Polity Press & Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, Helga (1998), ‘Times of Complexity’, in J.T. Fraser, M.P. Soulsby and A.J. Argyros (eds.), Time, Order, Chaos, Madison, CON: International Universities Press, pp. 91–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Anne-Marie and Paul Steinberg (1998), ‘The politics of apocalypse in the underground media of the Islamic resistance movement (HAMAS), a position paper for the center for millennial studies’, www.mille.org/template.htm (28 August 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichardt, Rolf and Eberhard Schmitt (eds.) (1988), Die Französische Revolution als Bruch des gesellschaftlichen Bewuβtseins, München: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Relke, Diana M.A. (1998), ‘In celebration of doomsday: The end of science and the beginning of equity’, Vox, 23 (February): http://www.usask.ca/wgst/journals/voxrelke.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salim, Fahd (1999), Asrar als ‘a wa-hujum al gharb, Madbuli alsaghir: Cairo before 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schick, Theodore (1997), ‘The end of science?’, Skeptical Inquirer March/April 1997: 36–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, Peter N. (1996), World History: Patterns of Change and Continuity,2nd edition, New York: West-view/Harper Collins College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowasser, Barbara (2000), A Time to Reap. Thoughts on Calendars and Millennialism, Washington, DC: Center for Contemporary Arab Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max (1972), Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie, Die Wirtschaftsethik der Weltreligionen, III: Das antike Judentum, Tübingen: Mohr and Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max ([1915-1920] 1991), Die Wirtschaftsethik der Weltreligionen: Taoismus und Konfuzianismus, Max Weber Gesamtausgabe, Band 1/19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, Steven (1998), ‘The expansion of physics’, in M. Howard and W.R. Louis (eds.), The Oxford History of the Twentieth Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, Langdon (1980), ‘Do artifacts have politics?’, Daedalus 109: 121–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemanek, Heinz (1987), Kalender und Chronologie. Bekanntes und Unbekanntes aus der Kalenderwissenschaft, 4. Ausg., München and Wien: Oldenbourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerubavel, Eviatar (1985), Hidden Rhythms: Schedules and Calendars in Social Life, Berkely, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Joerges, B. (2003). Reflections on the Millennium, Calendars, and the Gregorian Hegemony. In: Joerges, B., Nowotny, H. (eds) Social Studies of Science and Technology: Looking Back, Ahead. Sociology of the Sciences, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0185-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0185-4_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1482-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0185-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics