Abstract
All essays in this volume take their timeframe from the millennium, using year 2000 as a major marker. A few years into the new millennium, the turn of the twentieth century into the twenty-first continues to organize historical memory and foresight, even if the urgency to couch almost everything in terms of this chronology has dwindled and given way to more meaningful markers — not the least, as many have said, the ‘true’ beginning of the new century: September 11, 2001.1
Ideology is the other side of chronology Wolf Lepenies
Even if I failed to take them fully into account, my thanks for critical comments on consecutive versions of this essay go to Helga Nowotny, Richard Rottenburg, Joerg Potthast, Terry Shinn and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arjomand, Said Amir (1998), ‘Islamic Apocalypticism in the Classic Period’, in B. McGinn and S.J. Stein (eds.), Encyclopedia of Apocalypticism, New York: Continuum, Vol. 2, pp. 238–83.
Basnizki, Ludwig (1986), Der jüdische Kalender. Entstehung und Aufbau, Königstein/Ts.: Jüdischer Verlag.
Borst, Arno (1991 [1999]), Computus. Zeit und Zahl in der Geschichte Europas, Kleine kulturwissenschaftliche Bibliothek, 28 (letzte überarbeitete Ausgabe dtv 1999), Berlin: Wagenbach.
Clark, Timothy J. (1998), Farewell to an Idea. Episodes from a history of modernism, New Haven, CON: Yale University Press.
Elvee, Richard Q. (ed.) (1992), The End of Science?: Attack and Defense (The Nobel Conference Series), Landham, MD: University Press of America.
Foucault, Michel (1986), ‘Of other spaces’, Diacritics 16: 22–7.
Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman and Peter Scott (1994), The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London: Sage.
Ginzel, Friedrich K. (1906-14), Handbuch der mathematischen und technischen Chronologie. Das Zeitrechnungswesen der Völker, 3. Bd., Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs.
Gould, Stephen J. (1997), Questioning the Millennium: A Rationalist’ s Guide to a Precisely Arbitrary Countdown, London: Cape.
Hitchins, Christopher (2001), ‘Why the suicide killers chose September 11’, The Guardian, October 3, 2001.
Hobsbawm, Eric (1995), The Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century 1914-1991, London: Abacus Edition, Little, Brown and Co.
Hörning, Karl H., Daniela Ahrens and Anette Gerhard (1999), ‘Do technologies have time?’, Time & Society 8(2): 293–308.
Horgan, John (1996), The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age, Helix Books.
Hughes, Thomas P. (1983), Networks of Power, Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hughes, Thomas P. (1989), American Genesis. A Century of Invention and Technological Enthusiasm, New York: Viking.
Hughes, Thomas P. (1998), Rescuing Prometheus, New York: Pantheon.
Joerges, Bernward (1990), ‘“Global 2000” — Social science, ecology, and the bimillennium’, Futures (January/February): 3–20.
Joerges, Bernward (1994), ‘Ein Zeitalter der Energie’, in W. Zapf und M. Dierkes (eds.), Institutionenvergleich und Institutionendynamik, WZB-Jahrbuch 1994, Berlin: edition sigma, pp. 106–33.
Joerges, Bernward (1999), ‘Do Politics Have Artefacts?’, Social Studies of Science 29(3): 411–31.
Landes, David S. (1983), Revolution in Time: Clocks and the Making of the Modern World, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Larrain, Jorge (1989), Theories of Development: Capitalism, Colonialism and Dependency, Oxford: Polity Press.
Liebowitz, Stan J. and Stephen E. Margolis (2001), Winners, Losers & Microsoft, Competition and Antitrust in High Technology, Oakland, CA: The Independent Institute, revised edition.
Lepenies, Wolf (1999), ‘Das Altern unseres Jahrhunderts’, Tagesspiegel, 19. Juni 1999: 7.
Luhmann, Niklas (1986), ‘Das Problem der Epochenbildung und die Evolutionstheorie’, in H.U. Gumbrecht and U. Link-Heer (eds.), Epochenschwellen und Epochenstrukturen im Diskurs der Literatur-und Sprachtheorie, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 11–33.
Luhmann, Niklas (1990), ‘Die Zukunft kann nicht beginnen: Temporalstrukturen der modernen Gesellschaft’, in P. Sloterdijk (ed.), Vor der Jahrtausendwende: Berichte zur Lage der Zukunft, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 119–49.
Mackenzie, Adrian (2001), ‘The technicity of time: From 1.00 oscillations/sec to 9,192,631,770 HZ’, Time & Society 10(2-3): 235–57.
Maddox, John (1998), What Remains to Be Discovered: Mapping the Secrets of the Universe, the Origin of Life, and the Future of the Human Race, New York: Macmillan.
Maier, Hans (1991), Die Christliche Zeitrechnung, Freiburg: Herder.
Mayntz, Renate (1993), ‘Groβe Technische Systeme und ihre gesellschaftstheoretische Bedeutung’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 45(1): 97–108.
McNeill, William (1998), ‘Demography and Urbanization’, in M. Howard and W.R. Louis (eds.), The Oxford History of the Twentieth Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McClellan III, James E. and Harold Dorn (1998), Science And Technology In World History: An Introduction, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.
McGinn, Colin (1996), Die Grenzen vernünftigen Fragens. Grundprobleme der Philosophie, Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Meinzer, Michael (1992), Der Französische Revolutionskalender (1972-1805). Planung, Durchführung und Scheitern einer neuen Zeitrechnung, München: Oldenbourg Verlag.
Mittelstraβ, Jürgen (1998), Das Undenkbare denken. Über den Umgang mit dem Undenkbaren und Unvorstellbaren in der Wissenschaft, Berlin: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Preprint No. 105.
Nowotny, Helga (1993), Eigenzeit. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Nowotny, Helga (1997), Time: The Modern and Postmodern Experience, Oxford: Polity Press & Blackwell.
Nowotny, Helga (1998), ‘Times of Complexity’, in J.T. Fraser, M.P. Soulsby and A.J. Argyros (eds.), Time, Order, Chaos, Madison, CON: International Universities Press, pp. 91–107.
Oliver, Anne-Marie and Paul Steinberg (1998), ‘The politics of apocalypse in the underground media of the Islamic resistance movement (HAMAS), a position paper for the center for millennial studies’, www.mille.org/template.htm (28 August 1998).
Reichardt, Rolf and Eberhard Schmitt (eds.) (1988), Die Französische Revolution als Bruch des gesellschaftlichen Bewuβtseins, München: Oldenbourg.
Relke, Diana M.A. (1998), ‘In celebration of doomsday: The end of science and the beginning of equity’, Vox, 23 (February): http://www.usask.ca/wgst/journals/voxrelke.htm.
Salim, Fahd (1999), Asrar als ‘a wa-hujum al gharb, Madbuli alsaghir: Cairo before 1999.
Schick, Theodore (1997), ‘The end of science?’, Skeptical Inquirer March/April 1997: 36–9.
Stearns, Peter N. (1996), World History: Patterns of Change and Continuity,2nd edition, New York: West-view/Harper Collins College Publishers.
Stowasser, Barbara (2000), A Time to Reap. Thoughts on Calendars and Millennialism, Washington, DC: Center for Contemporary Arab Studies.
Weber, Max (1972), Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie, Die Wirtschaftsethik der Weltreligionen, III: Das antike Judentum, Tübingen: Mohr and Siebeck.
Weber, Max ([1915-1920] 1991), Die Wirtschaftsethik der Weltreligionen: Taoismus und Konfuzianismus, Max Weber Gesamtausgabe, Band 1/19.
Weinberg, Steven (1998), ‘The expansion of physics’, in M. Howard and W.R. Louis (eds.), The Oxford History of the Twentieth Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Winner, Langdon (1980), ‘Do artifacts have politics?’, Daedalus 109: 121–36.
Zemanek, Heinz (1987), Kalender und Chronologie. Bekanntes und Unbekanntes aus der Kalenderwissenschaft, 4. Ausg., München and Wien: Oldenbourg
Zerubavel, Eviatar (1985), Hidden Rhythms: Schedules and Calendars in Social Life, Berkely, CA: University of California Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Joerges, B. (2003). Reflections on the Millennium, Calendars, and the Gregorian Hegemony. In: Joerges, B., Nowotny, H. (eds) Social Studies of Science and Technology: Looking Back, Ahead. Sociology of the Sciences, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0185-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0185-4_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1482-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0185-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive