Skip to main content

Focus on Content

  • Chapter
Defining an Identity

Part of the book series: Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education ((CTISE,volume 20))

  • 166 Accesses

Abstract

In Chapter 1 the first criterion I suggested for science education as a distinctive field of research is that the researcher had a knowledge of science. This chapter is essentially about research that does meet that criterion. More particularly, much of what is discussed not only requires a knowledge of the science in the research, but also the capacity to critically evaluate that scientific knowledge from an educational perspective.

The Driver and Osborne books stimulated me to do more research evaluating the physics content to be taught, rather than more psychological or more general educational research or just more research in physics.

Sung Jae Pak, S. Korea

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andersen, A.-M., Schnack, K. and Sørensen, H. (1995) Science-Natur/Teknik: Assessment and learning. Didaktiske Studier Volume 22, Copenhagen: Royal Danish School of Educational Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzi, H., White, R.T. and Fensham, P.J. (1987) Teachers’ knowledge of science: An account of a study in progress. Paper presented at annual meeting of AERA, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blades, D.W. (1997) Procedures of Power and Curriculum Change. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevallard, Y. (1991) La Transposition Didactique. Grenoble, France: La Pensée Sauvage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierks, W. (1981) Stoichiometric calculations: Known problems and solutions at a chemistry-mathematics interface. Studies in Science Education 8: 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E. and Scott, P. (1994) Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher 23(7): 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P.J. (1980) Books, teachers and committees. European Journal of Science Education 2(3): 245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P.J. (1998) The politics of legitimating and marginalising companion meanings: Three case studies. In: D.A. Roberts and L. Östman (Eds.), Problems of Meaning in Science Curriculum, pp. 178–192, New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P.J. (2000) Providing suitable content in the science for all curriculum, In R. Millar, J. Leach and J. Osborne (Eds.) Improving Science Education: The contribution of research, pp. 147–164. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P.J. (2001) Science content as problematic — Issues for research. In: Helge Behrendt and Helmut Dahncke (Eds.), Research in Science Education: Past, present and future, pp. 27–42. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P.J. (2002) Time to change drivers. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 2(1): 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P.J. and Lui, J. (2001) What makes a chemical equation an equation? School Science Review 83(302): 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudmundsdottir, S. (1991) Pedagogical models of subject matter. In: J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in Research on Teaching, Volume 2, pp. 265–304. Greenwich, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundem, B.B. (2000) Understanding European Didactics. In: B. Moon, S. Brown and M. Ben-Peretz (Eds.), Routledge International Companion to Education, pp. 235–262, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundem, B.B. and Hopmann, S. (Eds.) (1998) Didaktik and/or Curriculum: An international dialogue. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensen, K.-H. and Olson, J. (1996) How teachers construe curriculum integration: The Science, Technology, Society (STS) movement as Bildung. Journal of Curriculum Studies 28(6): 669–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, C. (2001) Examining relations of power in the process of curriculum change: The case of VCE physics. Research in Science Education 31(4): 525–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopmann, S. and Riquarts, K. (Eds.) (1995) Didaktik and/or Curriculum. Kiel, Germany: IPN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klafki, W. (1958) Didaktische Analyse als Kern der Unterrichtsvorbereitung. Basel: Weinheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klafki, W. (1991) Can education science make a contribution to substantiating pedagogic aims. In: The Institute for Scientific Cooperation (Ed.), Education. A biannual collection of recent German contributions to the field of educational research, Volume 44, pp. 35–45, Tübingen, Germany: The Institute for Scientific Cooperation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menck, P. (2000) Looking into Classrooms: Papers on didactics. Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, E.F. (1995) Conceptual change or conceptual profile? Science and Education 4(3): 267–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senn-Fenell, C. (1995) Oral written communication for promoting mathematical understanding in teaching examples from Grade 3. Journal of Curriculum Studies 27(1): 31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1986) Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In: M. Wittrock (Ed.), The Handbook of Research on Teaching, 3rd edition, pp. 3–36. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1987) Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of a new reform. Harvard Education Review 57(1): 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1995) Wisdom for practice and wisdom of practice: Two aspects of a didactics of substance. In: S. Hopmann and K. Riquarts (Eds.), Didaktik and/or Curriculum. Kiel, Germany: IPN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strömdahl, H. (1996) On Mole and Amount of Substance: A study of the dynamics of concept formation and concept attainment. Gothenburg Studies in Educational Science 106, Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiberghien, A., (2000) Designing teaching situations. In: R. Millar, J. Leach and J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving Science Education: The contribution of research, pp. 27–47, Buckingham, England: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uljens, M. (1995) A model of school Didaktiks and its role in academic teacher education. In S. Hopmann and K. Riquarts (Eds.), Didaktik and/or Curriculum, pp. 301–322. Kiel, Germany: IPN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vásquez-Levy, D. (2002) Bildung-centred Didaktik: A framework for examining the educational potential of subject matter. Journal of Curriculum Studies 34(1): 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weninger, J. (1979) Grundsätzliches zu den sogennanten Reaktiongsleichungen. Naturwissenschaften im Unterricht (Physik/Chemie) 27: 207–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbury, I., Hopmann, S. and Riquarts, K. (2000) Teaching as Reflective Practice: The German Didaktik tradition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fensham, P.J. (2004). Focus on Content. In: Defining an Identity. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0175-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0175-5_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1468-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0175-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics