Abstract
In Chapter 1 the first criterion I suggested for science education as a distinctive field of research is that the researcher had a knowledge of science. This chapter is essentially about research that does meet that criterion. More particularly, much of what is discussed not only requires a knowledge of the science in the research, but also the capacity to critically evaluate that scientific knowledge from an educational perspective.
The Driver and Osborne books stimulated me to do more research evaluating the physics content to be taught, rather than more psychological or more general educational research or just more research in physics.
Sung Jae Pak, S. Korea
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andersen, A.-M., Schnack, K. and Sørensen, H. (1995) Science-Natur/Teknik: Assessment and learning. Didaktiske Studier Volume 22, Copenhagen: Royal Danish School of Educational Studies.
Arzi, H., White, R.T. and Fensham, P.J. (1987) Teachers’ knowledge of science: An account of a study in progress. Paper presented at annual meeting of AERA, Washington, DC.
Blades, D.W. (1997) Procedures of Power and Curriculum Change. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Chevallard, Y. (1991) La Transposition Didactique. Grenoble, France: La Pensée Sauvage.
Dierks, W. (1981) Stoichiometric calculations: Known problems and solutions at a chemistry-mathematics interface. Studies in Science Education 8: 93–105.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E. and Scott, P. (1994) Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher 23(7): 5–12.
Fensham, P.J. (1980) Books, teachers and committees. European Journal of Science Education 2(3): 245–252.
Fensham, P.J. (1998) The politics of legitimating and marginalising companion meanings: Three case studies. In: D.A. Roberts and L. Östman (Eds.), Problems of Meaning in Science Curriculum, pp. 178–192, New York: Teachers College Press.
Fensham, P.J. (2000) Providing suitable content in the science for all curriculum, In R. Millar, J. Leach and J. Osborne (Eds.) Improving Science Education: The contribution of research, pp. 147–164. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
Fensham, P.J. (2001) Science content as problematic — Issues for research. In: Helge Behrendt and Helmut Dahncke (Eds.), Research in Science Education: Past, present and future, pp. 27–42. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Fensham, P.J. (2002) Time to change drivers. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 2(1): 9–24.
Fensham, P.J. and Lui, J. (2001) What makes a chemical equation an equation? School Science Review 83(302): 57–62.
Gudmundsdottir, S. (1991) Pedagogical models of subject matter. In: J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in Research on Teaching, Volume 2, pp. 265–304. Greenwich, NY.
Gundem, B.B. (2000) Understanding European Didactics. In: B. Moon, S. Brown and M. Ben-Peretz (Eds.), Routledge International Companion to Education, pp. 235–262, London: Routledge.
Gundem, B.B. and Hopmann, S. (Eds.) (1998) Didaktik and/or Curriculum: An international dialogue. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Hensen, K.-H. and Olson, J. (1996) How teachers construe curriculum integration: The Science, Technology, Society (STS) movement as Bildung. Journal of Curriculum Studies 28(6): 669–682.
Hart, C. (2001) Examining relations of power in the process of curriculum change: The case of VCE physics. Research in Science Education 31(4): 525–552.
Hopmann, S. and Riquarts, K. (Eds.) (1995) Didaktik and/or Curriculum. Kiel, Germany: IPN.
Klafki, W. (1958) Didaktische Analyse als Kern der Unterrichtsvorbereitung. Basel: Weinheim.
Klafki, W. (1991) Can education science make a contribution to substantiating pedagogic aims. In: The Institute for Scientific Cooperation (Ed.), Education. A biannual collection of recent German contributions to the field of educational research, Volume 44, pp. 35–45, Tübingen, Germany: The Institute for Scientific Cooperation.
Menck, P. (2000) Looking into Classrooms: Papers on didactics. Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Mortimer, E.F. (1995) Conceptual change or conceptual profile? Science and Education 4(3): 267–285.
Senn-Fenell, C. (1995) Oral written communication for promoting mathematical understanding in teaching examples from Grade 3. Journal of Curriculum Studies 27(1): 31–54.
Shulman, L. (1986) Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In: M. Wittrock (Ed.), The Handbook of Research on Teaching, 3rd edition, pp. 3–36. New York: Macmillan.
Shulman, L. (1987) Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of a new reform. Harvard Education Review 57(1): 1–22.
Shulman, L. (1995) Wisdom for practice and wisdom of practice: Two aspects of a didactics of substance. In: S. Hopmann and K. Riquarts (Eds.), Didaktik and/or Curriculum. Kiel, Germany: IPN.
Strömdahl, H. (1996) On Mole and Amount of Substance: A study of the dynamics of concept formation and concept attainment. Gothenburg Studies in Educational Science 106, Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
Tiberghien, A., (2000) Designing teaching situations. In: R. Millar, J. Leach and J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving Science Education: The contribution of research, pp. 27–47, Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
Uljens, M. (1995) A model of school Didaktiks and its role in academic teacher education. In S. Hopmann and K. Riquarts (Eds.), Didaktik and/or Curriculum, pp. 301–322. Kiel, Germany: IPN.
Vásquez-Levy, D. (2002) Bildung-centred Didaktik: A framework for examining the educational potential of subject matter. Journal of Curriculum Studies 34(1): 117–128.
Weninger, J. (1979) Grundsätzliches zu den sogennanten Reaktiongsleichungen. Naturwissenschaften im Unterricht (Physik/Chemie) 27: 207–219
Westbury, I., Hopmann, S. and Riquarts, K. (2000) Teaching as Reflective Practice: The German Didaktik tradition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fensham, P.J. (2004). Focus on Content. In: Defining an Identity. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0175-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0175-5_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1468-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0175-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive