Lecture Notes on Quantum-Nondemolition Measurements in Optics
Part of the NATO Science Series book series (NAII, volume 113)
A general overview of quantum nondemolition measurements is provided and illustrated with a few examples from quantum optics. Also given are basic principles and theoretical fundament.
KeywordsMicrowave Soliton Assure Expense Sine
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Quantum Theory and Measurement, Eds. J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek (Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 1983).Google Scholar
- One may also have a goal oriented more to a preparation rather than to measurement. Here the repeated measurements can be used in a feedback loop, where the variable of interest is measured and then corrected towards a desirable value by an active device. Such cases as well as any other active intervention into the quantum system are left beyond the scope of this lecture.Google Scholar
- V. B. Braginsky and Y. I. Vorontsov, “Quantum-mechanical limitations in macroscopic experiments and modern experimental technique” Usp. Fiz. Nauk 114, 41–53 (1974) [Sov. Phys. Usp. 17, 644–650 (1975)]; V. B. Braginsky, Y. I. Vorontsov, and F. Y. Khalili “Quantum singularities of a ponderomotive meter of electromagnetic energy” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 73, 1340–1343 (1977) [Sov. Phys. JETP 46, 705–706 (1977)].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- P. D. Drummond, R. M. Shelby, S. R. Friberg, and Y. Yamamoto, “Quantum solitons in optical fibres”, Nature (London) 365, 307–313 (1993); P. Grangier, J. A. Levenson, and J.-P. Poizat, “Quantum non-demolition measurements in optics”, Nature (London) 396, 537–542 (1998); A. Sizmann and G. Leuchs, in “Progress in Optics” vol. XXXIX, ed. by E. Wolf, (Elsevier, NY) 1999, p.373.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- V. B. Braginsky and F. Ya. Khalili, Quantum measurement (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992).Google Scholar
- This theoretical treatment is after V.V. Kozlov and J.H. Eberly (unpublished).Google Scholar
- L. Allen and J. H. Eberly, Optical resonance and two-level atoms (Dover, New-York, 1987).Google Scholar
- K. S. Thorne, R. W. P. Drever, C. M. Caves, M. Zimmermann, and V. D. Sandberg “Quantum nondemolition measurements of harmonic oscillators” Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 667–671 (1978); W. G. Unruh “Quantum nondemolition and gravity-wave detection” Phys. Rev. B 19, 2888–2896 (1979); C. M. Caves, K. S. Thorne, R. W. P. Drever, V. D. Sandberg, and M. Zimmermann, “On the measurement of a weak classical force coupled to a quantum-mechanical oscillator. I. Issues of principles” Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 341–392 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- The sine operator Eq. (50) is used as a substitute for the phase operator. The definition of the last has a controversial history, see for instance a special issue on this subject in Physica Scripta, 48 (1993), “Quantum phase and phase dependent measurements”, Eds. W. P. Schleich and S. M. Barnett. The sine operator is however a well defined object and fits well the context of our problem. What is equally important, the operator can be measured directly in an optical experiment, see J. W. Noh, A. Fougeres, and L. Mandel, “Measurement of the quantum phase by photon counting”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1426–1429 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- see H. A. Haus, K. Watanabe, and Y. Yamamoto, “Quantum-nondemolition measurement of optical solitons”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B6, 1138–1148 (1989), for the first proposal of the QND measurements of optical solitons. See also S. R. Friberg, S. Machida, and Y. Yamamoto, “Quantum-nondemolition measurement of the photon number of an optical soliton”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3165–3168 (1992), for the first QND experiment with optical solitons.ADSGoogle Scholar
© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003