Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Marine Bioinvasions: Patterns, Processes and Perspectives pp 3–21Cite as

Assessing the ecological impacts of an introduced seastar: the importance of multiple methods

  • Chapter

Abstract

Introduced species are having major impacts in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems worldwide. Given that resources for management are limited and that only a small percentage of invaders are likely to cause large ecological change, management priorities should be based on the severity of immediate and anticipated impacts on native assemblages and commercial species. This paper synthesizes work on the current and predicted impacts of an introduced predatory seastar (Asterias amurensis) on soft sediment assemblages, including native species subject to commercial fishing, in the Derwent Estuary and other areas of southeast Tasmania. Due to the absence of baseline data prior to the arrival of the seastar and the presence of other anthropogenic stressors in the estuary, estimating the impact of the seastar is difficult. To help overcome the weaknesses of any single method, our assessment of impact rests on ‘weight of evidence’ from multiple approaches. Results from experimental manipulations at small scales, detailed observations of feeding, and field surveys over a range of spatial scales in areas with and without the seastar provide strong evidence that predation by the seastar is likely to be responsible for the decline and subsequent rarity of bivalve species that live just below or on the sediment surface in the Derwent Estuary. The data suggest that should seastar densities in other areas on the Tasmanian coast attain the current levels in the Derwent Estuary, there are likely to be large direct effects on native assemblages, particularly on populations of large surface dwelling bivalves, including several commercial species. Given the seastar’s ability to exploit a broad range of food resources other than bivalves, and the functional importance of bivalves in native systems, we predict broader direct and indirect effects on native assemblages. We would be unable to reach these same conclusions from a single approach to assessing impacts. The overall picture from the combination of methods at different scales provides more information than the sum of the results of the separate lines of investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allmon RA and Sebens KP (1988) Feeding biology and ecological impact of an introduced nudibranch, Tritonia plebia, in New England. Marine Biology 99: 375–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry JP and Dayton PK (1991) Physical heterogeneity and the organization of marine communities. In: Kolasa J and Pickett STA (eds) Ecological Heterogeneity, pp 270–320. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bax N (1999) Eradicating a dreissenid from Australia. Dreissena! 10: 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett B (1999) Healing the Derwent’s murky blues. Ecos 100: 10–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce BD, Sutton CA and Lyne V (1995) Laboratory and field studies of the larval distribution and duration of the introduced seastar Asterias amurensis with updated and improved prediction of the species spread based on a larval dispersal model. Final report to the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation. CSIRO Division of Marine Research, Hobart, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JB (1966) The biology of Echinocardium cordatum (Echinodermata: Spatangoidea) from different habitats. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 46: 97–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buttermore RE, Turner E and Morrice MG (1994) The introduced northern Pacific seastar Asterias amurensis in Tasmania. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 36: 21–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton JT and Geller JB (1993) Ecological roulette: the global transport of nonindigenous marine organisms. Science 261: 78–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KR and Ainsworth M (1993) A method of linking multivariate community structure to environmental variables. Marine Ecology Progress Series 1993: 205–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen AN and Carlton JT (1996) Nonindigenous aquatic species in a United States estuary: a case history of the ecological and economic effects of biological invasions in the San Francisco and Delta region. Report to the United States Fisheries and Wildlife Service

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen AN and Carlton JT (1998) Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary. Science 279: 555–558

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coles SL, DeFelice RC, Elderedge LG and Carlton JT (1999) Historical and recent introductions of non-indigenous marine species into Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaiian Islands. Marine Biology 135: 147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coughanowr C (1997) State of the Derwent Estuary: a review of environmental quality data to 1997. Supervising Scientists Report 129. Supervising scientist, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Culver C and Kuris A (2000) The apparent eradication of a locally introduced marine pest. Biological Invasions 2: 245–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dame RF (1996) Ecology of Marine Bivalves: An Ecosystem Approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond J (1986) Overview: laboratory experiments, filed experiments, and natural experiments. In: Diamond J and Case T (eds) Community Ecology, pp 3–22. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton CS (1958) The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Everett RA and Ruiz GM (1993) Coarse woody debris as a refuge from predation in aquatic communities, an experimental test. Oecologia 93: 475–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes TF, Huxham M and Piper SR (1999) Predator caging experiments: a test of the importance of scale. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 241: 137–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama AK (1994) A review of the distribution and life history of Asterias amurensis on the northeast Pacific coast. Unpublished report to CSIRO and National Seastar Task Force, Hobart, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama AK and Oliver JS (1985) Sea star and walrus predation on bivalves in Morton Sound, Bering Sea, Alaska. Ophelia 24: 17–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furlani DM (1996) A guide to the introduced marine species in Australian waters. CSIRO Division of Fisheries, Hobart, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasby T and Underwood A (1998) Determining the positions for control locations in environmental studies of estuarine marinas. Marine Ecology Progress Series 171: 1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasby TM (1997) Analysing data from post-impact studies using asymmetrical analysis of variance: a case study of epibiota on marinas. Australian Journal of Ecology 22: 448–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grannum RK, Murfet NB, Ritz DA and Turner E (1996) The distribution and impact of the exotic seastar, Asterias amurensis (Lutken), in Tasmania. In: The Introduced Northern Pacific Seastar, Asterias amurensis, in Tasmania, pp 53–138. Australian Nature Conservation Agency, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths CL, Hockey PAR, Schurink CV and Roux PJL (1992) Marine invasive aliens on South Africans shores: implication for community structure and trophic functioning. South African Journal of Marine Science 12: 713–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosholz ED and Ruiz GM (1995) Spread and potential impact of the recently introduced European Green crab, Carcinus maenas, in central California. Marine Biology 122: 239–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosholz E and Ruiz G (1996) Predicting the impact of introduced marine species: lessons from the multiple invasions of the European green crab Carcinus maenas. Biological Conservation 78: 59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosholz ED, Ruiz GM, Dean CA, Shirley KA, Maron JL and Connors PG (2000) The impacts of a nonindigenous marine predator in a California Bay. Ecology 81: 1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatanaka M and Kosaka M (1959) Biological studies on the population of the starfish, Asterias amurensis, in Sendai Bay. Tohoku Journal of Agricultural Research 9: 159–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt CL, Campbell ML, Thresher RE and Martin RB (1999) Marine biological invasions of Port Phillip Bay, Victoria. CSIRO Marine Research, Hobart, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes RN, Peer DL and Mann KH (1972) Use of multivariate analysis to identify functional components of the benthos in St Margaret’s Bay, Novia Scotia. Limnology and Oceanography 17: 111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson D (1994) Seastar fight gains momentum. Research 53: 25–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones M (1991) Marine organisms transported in ballast water: a review of the Australian scientific position. Department of Primary Industries and Energy, Bureau of Rural Resources, AGPS, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva P (1994) Higher order interactions as a foil to reductionist ecology. Ecology 75: 1527–1528

    Google Scholar 

  • Keough MJ and Mapstone BD (1995) Protocols for designing marine ecological monitoring programs associated with BEK mills. National Pulp Mills Research Program Technical Report No 11. CSIRO, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Keough MJ and Mapstone BD (1997) Designing environmental monitoring for pulp mills in Australia. Water Science and Technology 35: 397–404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim YS (1969) Selective feeding on the several bivalve molluscs by starfish, Asterias amurensis. Bulletin of the Facility of Fisheries Hokkaido University 19: 244–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipcius RN and Hines AH (1986) Variable functional responses of a marine predator in dissimilar homogenous habitats. Ecology 67: 1361–1371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockhart SJ (1995) Feeding biology of the introduced sea star, Asterias amurensis (Lutken) in Tasmania (Echinodermata Asteroidea). Department of Zoology. Honours thesis, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockhart SJ and Ritz DA (2001a) Size selectivity and energy maximisation of the introduced seastar, Asterias amurensis (Lutken), in Tasmania, Australia. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 135: 35–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockhart SJ and Ritz DA (2001b) Preliminary observations of the feeding periodicity and selectivity of the introduced seastar, Asterias amurensis (Lutken), in Tasmania, Australia. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 135: 25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge DM (1993) Biological Invasions: lessons for ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 133–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge DM, Stein RA and Brown KM (1998) Predicting impact of freshwater exotic species on native biodiversity: challenges in spatial scaling. Australian Journal of Ecology 23: 53–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin R and Bax N (1993) Scientific discussions in Japan and Russia on the northern Pacific seastar. Unpublished report. CSIRO Division of Marine Research, Hobart, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin R and Thresher R (1994) The north Pacific seastar: Australia’s most damaging pest? Search 25: 69–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Menge BA (1982) Effects offeeding on the environment: Asteroidea. In: Janguoux M and Lawrence JM (eds) Echinoderm Nutrition, pp 521–554. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrice MG (1995) The distribution and ecology of the introduced northern Pacific seastar, Asterias amurensis (Lutken), in Tasmania. In: The Introduced Northern Pacific Seastar, Asterias amurensis, in Tasmania, pp 1–47. Australian Nature Conservation Agency, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy N and Evans B (1998) Genetic origin of Australian populations of Asterias amurensis. Proceedings of a meeting on the biology and management of the introduced seastar, Asterias amurensis, in Australian waters pp 22–25. CSIRO Division of Marine Research, Hobart, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols FH, Thompson JK and Schemel LE (1990) Remarkable invasion of San Francisco Bay (California, USA) by the Asian clam Potamocorbula amurensis. II. Displacement of a former community. Marine Ecology Progress Series 66: 95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nojima S, Soliman FA, Kondo Y, Kuwano Y, Nasu K and Kitajima C (1986) Some notes of the outbreak of the sea star Asterias amurensis versiclor Sladen, in the Ariake Sea, western Kyshu. Publication of the Amakusa Marine Biology Laboratory Kyushi University 8: 89–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Osenberg CW and Schmitt RJ (1996) Detecting ecological impacts caused by human activities. In: Schmitt RJ and Osenberg CW (eds) Detecting Ecological Impacts: Concepts and Applications in Coastal Habitats, pp 3–16. Academic Press, San Diego, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker IM, Simberloff D, Lonsdale D, Goodel K, Wonham M, Kareiva PM, Williamson MH, Von Holle B, Moyle PB, Byers JE and Goldwasser L (1999) Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biological Invasions 1: 3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Lach L, Zuniga R and Morrison D (2000) Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. BioScience 50: 53–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard DA and Hutchings PA (1990a) A review of exotic marine organisms introduced to the Australian region. I. Fishes. Asian Fisheries Science 3: 205–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard DA and Hutchings PA (1990b) A review of exotic marine organisms introduced to the Australian region. 2. Invertebrates and Algae. Asian Fisheries Science 3: 222–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross DJ (2001) Impact of the northern Pacific seastar Asterias amurensis on soft sediment assemblages, including commercial species, in southeast Tasmania. PhD dissertation, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross DJ, Johnson CR and Hewitt CL (2002) Impact of the introduced seastar Asterias amurensis on survivorship of juvenile commercial bivalves Fulvia tenuicostata. Marine Ecology Progress Series 241: 99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross DJ, Johnson CR and Hewitt CL (2003) Variability in the impact of an introduced predator (Asterias amurensis: Asteroidea) on soft sediment assemblages. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 288: 257–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross DJ, Johnson CR and Hewitt CL (in press) Interaction and impacts of two introduced species on a soft sediment marine assemblage in SE Tasmania. Marine Biology

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads DC (1974) Organism-sediment relations on the muddy sea-floor. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 12: 263–300

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz GM, Fofonoff P, Hines AH and Grosholz ED (1999) Non-indigenous species as stressors in estuarine and marine communities: assessing invasion impacts and interactions. Limnology and Oceanography 44: 950–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, HL (1958) Benthic studies in Buzzard’s Bay. I. Animal-sediment relationships. Limnology and Oceanography 3: 245–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt RJ and Osenberg CW (eds) (1996) Detecting Ecological Impacts: Concepts and Applications in Coastal Habitats. Academic Press, San Diego, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Shushkina E and Musayeva E (1990) Structure of the plankton community from the Black Sea and its changes as a result of the introduction of a ctenophore species. Oceanology 30: 225–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D and Holle BV (1999) Positive interaction of non-indigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biological Invasions 1: 21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skilleter GA (1994) Refuges from predation and the persistence of estuarine clam populations. Marine Ecology Progress Series 109: 29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan NA (1980) Aspects of the feeding biology of asteroids. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 18: 57–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Thresher RE (2000) Key threats from marine bioinvasions: a review of current and future issues. In: Pederson J (ed) Proceedings of the First National Conference of Marine Bioinvasions. MIT Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrush SF (1999) Complex role of predators in structuring soft-sediment macrobenthic communities: implications of changes in spatial scale for experimental studies. Australian Journal of Ecology 24: 344–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrush SF, Cummings VJ, Dayton PK, Ford R, Grant J, Hewitt JE, Hines AH, Lawrie SM, Pridmore RD, Legendre P, Mcardle BH, Schneider DC, Turner SJ, Whitlatch RB and Wilkinson MR (1997) Matching the outcome ofsmall-scale density manipulation experiments with larger scale patterns an example of bivalve adult/juvenile interactions. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 216: 153–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrush SF, Hewitt JE, Cummings VJ, Green MO, Funnell GA and Wilkinson MR (2000) The generality of field experiments: interactions between local and broad-scale processes. Ecology 81: 399–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner E (1992) A northern Pacific seastar, Asterias amurensis,in Tasmania. Australian Marine Science Bulletin 120: 18–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ (1991) Beyond BACI: experimental designs for detecting human environmental impacts on temporal variations in natural populations. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 42: 569–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ (1992) Beyond BACI: the detection of environmental impacts on populations in the real, but variable, world. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 161: 145–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ (1996) Detection, interpretation, prediction and management of environmental disturbances: some roles for experimental marine ecology. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 200: 1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virnstein RW (1977) The importance of predation by crabs and fishes on benthic infauna in Chesapeake Bay. Ecology 58: 119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, D’Antonio CM, Loope LL and Westbrooks R (1996) Biological invasions as global environmental change. American Scientist 84: 468–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Willan RC, Russell BC, Murfet NB, Moore KL, McEnnulty FR, Horner SK, Hewitt CL, Dally GM, Campbell ML and Bourke ST (2000) Outbreak of Mytilopsis sallei (Récluz, 1849) (Bivalvia; Dressenida) in Australia. Molluscan Research 20(2): 25–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M (1996) Biological Invasions. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodin SA (1974) Polychaete abundance patterns in a marine soft sediment environment: the importance of biological interactions. Ecological Monographs 44: 171–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodin SA (1978) Refuges, disturbance and community structure: a marine soft-bottom example. Ecology 59: 274–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Zoology, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay, Tasmania, 7000, Australia

    D. Jeff Ross & Craig R. Johnson

  2. Centre for Research on Introduced Marine Pests, CSIRO Marine Research, Hobart, Tasmania, 7001, Australia

    D. Jeff Ross & Chad L. Hewitt

  3. Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia

    D. Jeff Ross

  4. Ministry of Fisheries, P.O. Box 2526, Wellington, New Zealand

    Chad L. Hewitt

Authors
  1. D. Jeff Ross
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Craig R. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chad L. Hewitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sea Grant College Program, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

    Judith Pederson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ross, D.J., Johnson, C.R., Hewitt, C.L. (2003). Assessing the ecological impacts of an introduced seastar: the importance of multiple methods. In: Pederson, J. (eds) Marine Bioinvasions: Patterns, Processes and Perspectives. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0169-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0169-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3984-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0169-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation