Abstract
In 1755, when an earthquake killed half of the population of Lisbon, there was a huge debate in Europe: was such a disaster a punishment from heaven? Or was it a natural phenomenon, for which scientific explanations had to be found? This event was the beginning of a new era, in which science was seen as the only way to protect people from risk stemming from nature, which was regarded as bad. Scientific developments liberated humankind from old frights, so that the future was no longer considered with fear but rather with hope. Yet, at the beginning of the new century, the situation is largely reversed: while nature is generally seen as good, optimism about science is tempered by a growing awareness of risk. Though the fruits of science are more numerous than expected, they have a bitter taste. The progress of knowledge has given birth to new threats, and what is behind the counter might be even worse than what is already in the window. Thus, hope has been progressively replaced by a diffuse anxiety.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Haynes, R. D. (1994) From Faust to Strangelove, Representations of the Scientist in the Western Literature, John Hopkins University Press.
Gibbons, M. et al. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge, The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, Sage, London.
Beck, U. (1986) Risk Society, Towards a New Modernity, Sage, London.
Merton, R. K. (1938) Science and the Social Order, Philosophy of Science 5, 332.
Thaller, M. (2002) Where have all the graduate students gone? The Christian Science Monitor, July 25.
Skolnikoff, E. (2002) Research Universities and National Security. Can Traditional Values Survive? Science and Technology in a Vulnerable World, Supplement to AAAS Science and Technology Policy Yearbook 2003, Washington.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schméder, G. (2003). Science and Risk: Scientific Authority at Risk. In: Beer, T., Ismail-Zadeh, A. (eds) Risk Science and Sustainability. NATO Science, vol 112. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0167-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0167-0_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1447-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0167-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive