Advertisement

Earth Sciences Contribution to the Sustainable Development of Ground Transportation Systems: Relevant Case Studies in Central Europe

Geodynamics of Central Europe and Transportation
  • Giuliano F. Panza
  • Mihaela Kouteva
Part of the NATO Science book series (NAII, volume 112)

Abstract

Our society — our way of life — depends on a complex network of infrastructure systems: e.g. the lifelines that provide transportation and communication services, a supply of energy and fresh water, and the disposal of wastewater and waste products. Among the oldest of these lifelines are our transportation systems — highways, railroads, mass transit, ports, waterways, and airports. The recent political changes and running processes of globalisation in Europe motivate the priority given to sustainable development, e.g. sustainable transport and its interaction with human activities. In the European Union, total spending in the transport sector now runs, according to current estimates, at some 11 000 billion, or 10% of gross domestic product [1]. The recent results, obtained from the European transport research programme, concern enforcement of traffic rules, driver behaviour, passive safety [2], but not preparedness to meet a natural disaster (e.g. earthquakes, landslides, floods). A key policy target is to implement a new road safety action programme improving road user and road infrastructure safety. Attention has been paid to safety during road design, construction and maintenance and urban safety management schemes as well, but not to the natural hazards.

Keywords

Ground Motion Seismic Hazard Seismic Source Epicentral Distance Seismic Hazard Assessment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Euroabstracts (2002) Transport policy: time to decide, http://www.cordis.lu.
  2. 2.
    Road Safety. Results from the transport research programme, EC, EXTRA Consortium for DG Energy and Transport. http://europa.eu.int/comm/transport/extra/road_safety.pdf.
  3. 3.
    European Transport Networks. Results from the transport research programme, EC EXTRA consortium for DG Energy and Transport, http://europa.eu.int/comm/transport/extra/policy_brochures.html.
  4. 4.
    IEEE, Intelligent transportation systems council (2001), Newsletters 3, 1, http://www.ieee.org.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Demographic Yearbook (1995), United Nations publication, Sales No. E/F.97.XIII.1, table 8.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grant Heiken (EES-1) and Greg Valentine (EES-5), Cities-National and Global Securities Issues, http://www.ees.lanl.gov/EES5/Urban_Security/pdfs/Cities_Securitylssues.pdf.
  7. 7.
    Panza, G.F. (2002) Realistic modelling of seismic input for megacities and large urban areas, UNESCO-IUGS-IGCP Project 414, in Progress of the IGCP projects in 2002, Episodes 25(3), 160–184.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Flesch, R., Palumbo, P., Panza, G.F., Romanelli, F., Vaccari, F., Legeron, F., Schmitt, P., Delgado, R., Faria, R., Barbat, A., Pinto, A., Tsionis, G. (2001) Advanced methods for assessing the seismic vulnerability of existing motorway bridges, Final report, ENV4-CT97-0574/EC, Research DG.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Muço, B., Vaccari, F., Panza, G.F., and Kuka, N. (2002) Seismic zonation in Albania using a deterministic approach, Tectonophysics 344, 277–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    National Earthquake Information Centre, NEIC, World Data Center for Seismology, Denver, http://neic.usgs.gov
  11. 11.
    Cooper, J. D., Friedband, I., Buckle, I., Nimis, R., Bobb, N. McM. The Nortridge Earthquake: Progress Mode, Lessons Learned in Seismic Resistant Bridge Design, http://www.tfhrc.gov/pubrds/summer94/p94su26.htm
  12. 12.
    The Taiwan earthquake, September 21, 1999, http://www.mceer.buffalo.edu/research/taiwaneq9_99.
  13. 13.
    Mandrescu, N. and Radualian, M. (1999) Macroseismic Field of the Romanian Inntermediate-Depth Earthquakes, in F. Wenzel and D. Lungu (eds.) Vrancea Earthquakes: Tectonics, Hazard and Risk Mitigation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brankov, G., ed. (1983) Vrancea Earthquake in 1977. Its after-effects in the people’s republic of Bulgaria, BAS, Sofia (in Bulgarian).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Caputo, M. (1987) Sismologia e segnali precursori dei terremoti, Calderini, Bologna.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Balan, St., Cristescu, V., and Cornea I., eds. (1982) Cutremurul de parmnt din Romania de la 4 martie 1977, Editura Academiei, Bucuresti, Romania.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Panza, G.F., Peresan, A., Vaccari, F., Romashkova, L., Kossobokov, V., Gorshkov, A., and Kuznetsov, I. (2002) Earthquake preparedness: the contribution of earthquake prediction and deterministic hazard research, in Earthquakes and Mediterranean storms (two examples of complex systems), Proceedings of the IEC Jornades Cientifiques (24-25 January 2002). Institut d’Estudis Catalans. Barcelona, Spain. In press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Panza, G.F., Radulian, M., and Trifu, C.I., eds. (2000) Seismic hazard of the Circum — Panonian Region, Pageoph Topical volumes, Birkhauser.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Panza, G.F., Romanelli, F., and Vaccari, F. (2001) Seismic wave propagation in laterally heterogeneous anelastic media: theory and applications to seismic zonation, Advances in geophysics 43, 1–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pontevivo, A. and Panza, G.F. (2002) Group velocity tomography and regionalization in Italy and bordering areas, Phys. Earth Planet Inter. 134, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Raykova, R. and Nikolova, Sv. (2001) Shear wave velocity models of the Earth’s crust and uppermost mantle from the Rayleigh waves in the Balkan Peninsula and adjacent areas, Bulg. Geoph. J. 26, 1–4.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Papazachos, B.C., Palatou, M, and Mindolas, N.M. (1967) Dispersion of the surface waves recorded in Athens, Pure Appl. Geophys. 67, 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Papazachos, B. C. (1969) Phase velocities of Rayleigh waves in southeastern Europe and Eastern Mediterranean sea, Pure Appl. Geophys. 75, 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rizhikova. S. and Petkov, I. (1975) Group velocity dispersion and the Black Sea crust structure, Verrof. Zentr. Inst. Phys. d. Erde 31, 383–390.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Calcagnile, G., D’Ingeo, F., Faruggia, P., Panza, G.F. (1982) The litosphere in the Central-eastern Mediterranean area, Pure Appl. Geophys. 120, 389–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Calcagnile, G, and Panza, G.F. (1981) The main characteristics of the litosphere-astenosphere system in Italy and surrounding regions, Pure Appl. Geophys. 119, 865–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Calcagnile, G. and Panza, G. F. (1990) Crustal and upper mantle structure of Mediterranean area derived from surface-wave data, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 60, 163–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yanovskaya, T.B. and Nikolova, Sv. (1984) Distribution of the group velocities of the surface waves of Rayleigh and Love in Southeastern Europe and Asia Minor (in Russian), Bulg. Geoph. J. 10, 83–93.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gobarennko, V., Nikolova, Sv., and Yanovskaya, T.B. (1987) 2-D and 3-D velocity patterns in southeastern Europe, Asia Minor and the eastern Mediterranean from seismological data, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 90, 473–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Du, Z.J., Michelini, A., and Panza G.F. (1998) EurIP: a regionalised 3-D seismological model of Europe, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 105, 31–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Panza, G.F., Cioflan, C.O., Kouteva, M., Paskaleva, I., and Romanelli, F. (2002) An Innovtive Assessment of the Seismic Hazard from the Vrancea Intermediate-Depth Earthquakes: Case studies in Romania and Bulgaria, Proc. of the 12 ECEE, London, 2002, CD, Ref. 230.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kouteva, M., Panza, G.F., Paskaleva, I., and Romanelli, F. (2002) Modelling of the Ground Motion at Russe site (NE Bulgaria) due to the Vrancea Earthquakes, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, in press.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Field, W. H. (2000) Accounting for Site Effects in Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analyses of Southern California, Bull. Sels. Soc. Amer. 90, 67–86.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Panza, G.F., Peresan, A., Romanelli, F., Suhadolc, P., Kouteva, M., Paskaleva, I., El Sayed, A., Nunziata, C, Gorshkov, A., Kossobokov, V., Kronrod, T., Kuznetzov, I., Molchan, G., Soloviev, A., Benouar, D., Herak, M., Zivcic, M., Kiratzi, A., Hatzidimitriou, P., Fiorotto, V., Marmureanu, G., Radulian, M., Tadili, B.A., Alptekin, O., and Mourrabit, T. (2002) A strategy to increase earthquake preparedness: contributions from intermediate-term medium-range predictions and seismic microzoning, Theme B — “Managing Unacceptable Risk through Improved Mitigation and Preparedness Models”. Toolbox for Global Disaster Reduction, Alpha edition. CD-Rom. (http://www.gadr.giees.uncc.edu/).

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giuliano F. Panza
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mihaela Kouteva
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Earth SciencesUniversity of TriesteTriesteItaly
  2. 2.SAND GroupThe Abdus Salam ICTPTriesteItaly
  3. 3.CLSMEEBulgarian Academy of SciencesSofiaBulgaria

Personalised recommendations