Abstract
This chapter addresses how the intention of an agent responsible for an instance of a pattern of behaviour determines the processes by which the instance is started or finished.
An organization may be modelled using the concepts of Semantic Analysis which determine the relationships between agents and affordances — the patterns of behaviour available to the agents. These relationships may be represented in an ontological schema. A particular, the individual occurrence of affordance, is started and finished by processes resulting from communicative acts on the part of an agent
This chapter considers how the norms which initiate the processes leading to the start or finish of particulars may be triggered by substantive or communicative acts committed by or on behalf of an agent. In authorising the commitment of the act the agent has some intention to achieve something, the completion of a specific process. Different intentions on the part of authorising agents lead to triggering different norms and initiating different processes.
Modelling norms and processes which derive from different intentions recorded in communicative acts has two benefits. First it assists in the provision of semantic understanding of an organization; secondly it enables the model to incorporate changes to the organization in the form of changes to single rules or norms by which particulars may start or to complete changes in the affordances available to the agents.
The aim of the chapter is to demonstrate how the different intentions of the authorities initiating the start or finish of a particular may be used to define which norms and processes are selected to execute the start or finish. The concepts presented in this chapter are illustrated using an example of a library where members may borrow books or ‘reserve’ books with the intention of borrowing when the book is available.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andersen, P. B. (1997). The Theory of computer semiotics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barjis, J., Dietz, J. L. G., & Liu, K. (2001). Combining the DEMO methodology with semiotic methods in business process modelling. In K. Liu, R. J. Clarke, P. B. Andersen, & R. K. Stamper (Eds.), Information, organisation and technology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Carvalho, J. A. (2000). Information Systems? Which one do you mean? In E. D. Falkenberg, K. Lyytinen, & A. A. Verrijn-Stuart (Eds.), Information system concepts: An integrated discipline emerging (pp. 259–276). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Clarke, R. J. (2000). An Information System in its Organisational Contexts: A Systemic Semiotic Longitudinal Case Study, Ph. D. Thesis, Wollongong,.
Dietz, J. L. G., Goldkuhl, G., Lind, M., & Reijswoud, V. E. v. (1998). The communicative action paradigm — an agenda. Paper presented at The Third International workshop on the Language Action Perspective on Communication Modelling (LAP’98), Stockholm June 25–26, 1998.
Falkenberg, E. D., Hesse, W., Lindgreen, P., Nilsson, B. E., Oei, J. L. H., Rolland, C., Stamper, R. K., Assche, F. J. M. V., Verrijn-Stuart, A. A., & Voss, K. (1998). A framework of information systems concepts — the FRISCO report (web edition). IFIP. Available: http://www.leidenuniv.nl/~verrynst/frisco.html.
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Goldkuhl, G. (2001, July 21–22, 2001). Communicative vs material actions: Instrumentality, sociality and comprehensibility. Paper presented at the Sixth International Workshop on the Language-Action Perspective on Communication Modelling (LAP 2001), Montreal, Canada.
Goldkuhl, G., & Rbstlinger, A. (1999). Expanding the scope — From language Action to generic practice. Paper presented at the Language Action Perspective, 1999, Copenhagen.
Liu, K. (2000). Semiotics in information systems engineering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Liu, K., Sun, L., Dix, A., & Narasipuram, M. (2001). Norm-based agency for designing collaborative information systems. Information Systems Journal, 11, 229–247.
Michaels, C. F., & Carello, C. (1981). Direct perception. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Salter, A. (2001). Semantic modelling and a semantic normal form (SOCTR/01/01): Staffordshire University, School of Computing.
Salter, A. & Liu, K. (2002). Using semantic analysis and norm analysis to model organisations. Paper accepted to the ICEIS 2002, Cuidad Real, Spain.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts — An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sergot, M. (1998). Normative positions. In P. McNamara & H. Prakken (Eds.), Norms, logics and information systems (pp. 289–308). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
St. Amant, R. (1998). Affordances for acting in direct manipulation interfaces (Technical Report TR-98-04): North Carolina State University.
Stamper, R. (1985). Knowledge as action: a logic of social norms and individual affordances. In G. N. Gilbert & C. Heath (Eds.), Social Action and Artificial Intelligence (pp. 172–191). Aldershot, Hampshire: Gower Press.
Stamper, R. (1996). Signs, information, norms and systems. In B. Holmqvist, P. B. Andersen, H. Klein, & R. Posner (Eds.), Signs of Work: Semiosis and Information Processing in Organisations (pp. 349–397). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.
Stamper, R. (2000a). New directions for systems analysis and design. In J. Filipe (Ed.), Enterprise Information Systems (pp. 14–39). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Stamper, R. (2001). Organisational semiotics — Information without the computer? In K. Liu, R. J. Clarke, P. B. Andersen, & R. K. Stamper (Eds.), Information, Organisation and Technology: studies in Organisational Semiotics (pp. 115–172). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Stamper, R., Althaus, K., & Backhouse, J. (1988). MEASUR: Method for Eliciting, Analysing and Specifying User Requirements. In T. W. Olle, A. A. Verrijn-Stuart, & L. Bhabuts (Eds.), Computerised Assistance During the Information Systems Life Cycle (pp. 67–116). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Salter, A. (2003). Linking Intention and Processes in Organizations. In: Gazendam, H.W.M., Jorna, R.J., Cijsouw, R.S. (eds) Dynamics and Change in Organizations. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0161-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0161-8_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3986-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0161-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive