Abstract
Managing knowledge involved in the design process of a new artefact is discussed starting from the principle to regard each actor of the process as the stakeholder of a particular viewpoint on the object to be. The two concepts of Viewpoint and of Correlation of Viewpoints are considered from a semiotic angle in that dealing with conditions an actor gives some sense to the object to be, as opposed to a semantic or ontological view which postulates that the object has a sense in itself. The semiotic approach on the one hand, and the synthesis of an experiment, on the other hand, give means to establish that the intuitive concepts of Viewpoint and Correlation of Viewpoints fall under a paradigm, called the Viewpoint Paradigm. The basis of this paradigm is stated as follows: the sense of an object to be designed consists of the integration of the viewpoints which are exerted on it. Two computerized models of Viewpoint and Correlation of Viewpoints are presented. The first aims at recognizing viewpoints and their correlations starting from the written documents produced during the design process. The second supports the definition of evolution indicators of the design process by means of a logical framework in which each viewpoint is associated with a knowledge-based system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Deledalle, G. (1990). Lire Peirce aujourd’hui [Coll. Le point philosophique]. Paris: De Boeck.
Easterbrook, S. M., Finkelstein, A. C. W., Kramer, J., & Nuseibeh, B. A. (1994). Coordinating distributed viewpoints: The anatomy of a consistency check. Journal of Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications [Special issue on conflict management], 2(3), 209–222. West Bloomfield, MI: CERA Institute/ Technomic Publishing Company Inc.
Eco, U. (1973). Segno. Milano: ISEDI.
Finkelstein, A. C. W., & Fuks, H. (1989). Multi-party specification. In Proc 5th International Workshop on Software Specification & Design (pp. 185–196). Pittsburgh, PA: IEEE CS. Press.
Galarreta, D., Charrel, P.J., Orel, T. Rothenburger, B., Trousse, B., & Vogel C. (1998). Study of dynamic viewpoints in satellite design. In Proceedings of the 9 th Symposium IFAC Information COntrol in Manufacturing systems INCOM’98, Nancy, June 24–26, volume 3 (pp. 204–208).
Greimas, A. J. (1966). Sémantique structurale. Paris: Larousse.
Kontonya, G. & Sommerville, I. (1992). Viewpoints for requirements definition. IEEE Software Engineering Journal, 7, 375–387.
Leite, J. C. S. P. & Freeman, P. A. (1991). Requirements validation through viewpoint resolution. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 17(12), 1253–1269.
Leite, J. C. S. P. (1988). Viewpoint resolution in requirements elicitation. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of California Irvine.
Morin, E. (19991). La complexité humaine [Coll. Champs l’Essentiel]. Paris: Flammarion.
Mullery, G. P. (1979). CORE — a method for controlled requirement specifications. Proceedings of the 4 th International Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 126–135). München, Germany: IEEE CS Press,.
Nuseibeh, B. A., Kramer, J., & Finkelstein, A. C. W. (1994). Expressing the relationships between multiple views in requirements specification. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 20(10), 760–773.
Peirce, C. S. (1932). Collected papers. Harvard U.P.
Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., & Booch, G. (1999). The unified modeling language reference manual. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Zave, P. (1997). Classification of Research efforts in Requirement Engineering. Computing Surveys, 29(4), 315–321.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Charrel, PJ. (2003). Viewpoints for knowledge management in system design. In: Gazendam, H.W.M., Jorna, R.J., Cijsouw, R.S. (eds) Dynamics and Change in Organizations. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0161-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0161-8_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3986-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0161-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive