Skip to main content

The Dynamics of Time and Timelessness: Philosophy, Physics and Prospects for our Life

  • Chapter
  • 682 Accesses

Part of the book series: NATO Science Series ((NAII,volume 95))

Abstract

The concept of endo-physics was introduced [12] in the context of selfreference in quantum physics and artificial intelligence (AI) research. Now, regarding quantum physics, it implicitly relies on something existing outer to itself, namely, the existence of an observer related to consciousness. In order to evaluate the relation of consciousness to (quantum) physics, it is necessary to recognise the fact that physical behaviour follows the principle of least action (action principle) which requires the behaviour to be directed towards the physical equilibrium. Now since biology follows a principle which acts against the physical principle, attempting to preserve the distance from physical equilibrium, and consciousness allegedly develops only in biological organisms (at least in the observer concept of quantum physics), the observer lives on an ontologically different level from the physical realm [35]. Therefore, the epistemological structure of the observer-observed relation contains a two-levelled ontological structure. Regarding AI, it relies on “creators” of hardware and software, therefore its epistemology is that of the deistic materialism [6], i.e. another ontologically two-levelled structure. Now self-modification, the concept closely related to endophysics [7], is characteristic for a biological and/or psychological level of ontology [45]. Therefore, it is an important recognition that self-governing systems follow developmental paths different from physical entities. Therefore endo-physics, putting the observer into a physical context, compresses the two-levelled ontological structure into a monistic ontology and creates epistemic paradoxes with Klein-bottle structures. Nevertheless, when we are aware that there is an at least two-levelled ontology behind the concept of endophysics, it is easy to remove certain types of paradox epistemic structures, like Klein-bottles, since self-reference becomes simply reference of one existential level to another.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Finkelstein, D. and Finkelstein, S.R. (1983) Computational Complementarity, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 22, 753–779.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Rössler, O.E. (1987) Endophysics, in J.L. Casti and A. Karlquist (eds.), Real Brains, Artificial Minds, North-Holland, New York. pp. 25–46.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grandpierre, A. (2000) The nature of the Universe and the ultimate organisational principle, Ultimate Reality and Meaning 23, 12–35.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grandpierre, A. (2002) The fundamental principles of existence and the origin of physical laws, Ultimate, Reality and Meaning 25, 127–147.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grandpierre, A. (2002) The Book of the Living Universe, (in Hungarian).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Smart, J.J.C. (1989) Materialism, The New Encyclopedia Britannica, Enc. Br. Inc., 25, 630–634.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kampis, G. (1990) Self-Modifying Systems in Biology and Cognitive Science, Pcrgamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Evangeliou, C. (2003) The Aristotelian relation of time to motion and to the human soul, this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kampis, G. (1994) Biological evolution as a process viewed internally, in H. Atmanspacher and G.J. Dalenoort (eds.), End/Exo Problems in Dynamical Systems, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mclntyre, A. et al. (1967) in P. Edwards (edidor-in-chief), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, The Macmillan Co. and The Free Press, New York, 7, pp. 530–541.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jaspers, K. (1923) Allgemeine Psychopathologie, Spriner, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Saniga, M. (1998) Unveiling the nature of time: altered states of consciousness and pencil generated space-times, The International Journal of Transdisciplinary Studies 2, 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Saniga, M. (2000) Algebraic geometry: a tool for resolving the enigma of time?, in Buccheri, Di Gesù, and Saniga (eds.), Studies on the Structure of Time: from Physics to Psycho(patho)logy, Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers, New York, pp. 137–166.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Saniga, M. (2001) Cremona transformations and the conundrum of dimensionality and signature of macro-spacetime, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 12, 2127–2142.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Saniga, M. (2003) Geometry of time and dimensionality of space, this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  16. —, (1979) The Dictionary of Hungarian Language lélek, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, IV, 702, (in Hungarian).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Eislcr, R. (1927) Animismus, Vörterbuch der Philosophischen Begriffe, E. S. Mittler & Sohn, Berlin, 1, 52.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Grandpierre, A. (1999) The nature of man-universe connections, The Noetic. Journal 2, 52–66.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Feynman, R.P., Leighton, R.B., and Sands, M. (1963) The Feynman Lectures in Physics, Addison-Wesley Publ. Co., Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hemley, R.J. (1995) Turning off the water, Nature 378, 14.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bauer, E. (1967) Theoretical Biology, in Hungarian (1935, in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Neumann, John von (1966) Theory of Self-Reproducing Automata, edited and completed by A. W. Burks, University of Illinois Press, Urbana and London, 80.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grandpierre, A. (2003). The Dynamics of Time and Timelessness: Philosophy, Physics and Prospects for our Life. In: Buccheri, R., Saniga, M., Stuckey, W.M. (eds) The Nature of Time: Geometry, Physics and Perception. NATO Science Series, vol 95. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0155-7_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0155-7_39

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1201-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0155-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics