Abstract
The concept of endo-physics was introduced [1–2] in the context of selfreference in quantum physics and artificial intelligence (AI) research. Now, regarding quantum physics, it implicitly relies on something existing outer to itself, namely, the existence of an observer related to consciousness. In order to evaluate the relation of consciousness to (quantum) physics, it is necessary to recognise the fact that physical behaviour follows the principle of least action (action principle) which requires the behaviour to be directed towards the physical equilibrium. Now since biology follows a principle which acts against the physical principle, attempting to preserve the distance from physical equilibrium, and consciousness allegedly develops only in biological organisms (at least in the observer concept of quantum physics), the observer lives on an ontologically different level from the physical realm [3–5]. Therefore, the epistemological structure of the observer-observed relation contains a two-levelled ontological structure. Regarding AI, it relies on “creators” of hardware and software, therefore its epistemology is that of the deistic materialism [6], i.e. another ontologically two-levelled structure. Now self-modification, the concept closely related to endophysics [7], is characteristic for a biological and/or psychological level of ontology [4–5]. Therefore, it is an important recognition that self-governing systems follow developmental paths different from physical entities. Therefore endo-physics, putting the observer into a physical context, compresses the two-levelled ontological structure into a monistic ontology and creates epistemic paradoxes with Klein-bottle structures. Nevertheless, when we are aware that there is an at least two-levelled ontology behind the concept of endophysics, it is easy to remove certain types of paradox epistemic structures, like Klein-bottles, since self-reference becomes simply reference of one existential level to another.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Finkelstein, D. and Finkelstein, S.R. (1983) Computational Complementarity, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 22, 753–779.
Rössler, O.E. (1987) Endophysics, in J.L. Casti and A. Karlquist (eds.), Real Brains, Artificial Minds, North-Holland, New York. pp. 25–46.
Grandpierre, A. (2000) The nature of the Universe and the ultimate organisational principle, Ultimate Reality and Meaning 23, 12–35.
Grandpierre, A. (2002) The fundamental principles of existence and the origin of physical laws, Ultimate, Reality and Meaning 25, 127–147.
Grandpierre, A. (2002) The Book of the Living Universe, (in Hungarian).
Smart, J.J.C. (1989) Materialism, The New Encyclopedia Britannica, Enc. Br. Inc., 25, 630–634.
Kampis, G. (1990) Self-Modifying Systems in Biology and Cognitive Science, Pcrgamon Press, Oxford.
Evangeliou, C. (2003) The Aristotelian relation of time to motion and to the human soul, this volume.
Kampis, G. (1994) Biological evolution as a process viewed internally, in H. Atmanspacher and G.J. Dalenoort (eds.), End/Exo Problems in Dynamical Systems, Springer, Berlin.
Mclntyre, A. et al. (1967) in P. Edwards (edidor-in-chief), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, The Macmillan Co. and The Free Press, New York, 7, pp. 530–541.
Jaspers, K. (1923) Allgemeine Psychopathologie, Spriner, Berlin.
Saniga, M. (1998) Unveiling the nature of time: altered states of consciousness and pencil generated space-times, The International Journal of Transdisciplinary Studies 2, 8–17.
Saniga, M. (2000) Algebraic geometry: a tool for resolving the enigma of time?, in Buccheri, Di Gesù, and Saniga (eds.), Studies on the Structure of Time: from Physics to Psycho(patho)logy, Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers, New York, pp. 137–166.
Saniga, M. (2001) Cremona transformations and the conundrum of dimensionality and signature of macro-spacetime, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 12, 2127–2142.
Saniga, M. (2003) Geometry of time and dimensionality of space, this volume.
—, (1979) The Dictionary of Hungarian Language lélek, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, IV, 702, (in Hungarian).
Eislcr, R. (1927) Animismus, Vörterbuch der Philosophischen Begriffe, E. S. Mittler & Sohn, Berlin, 1, 52.
Grandpierre, A. (1999) The nature of man-universe connections, The Noetic. Journal 2, 52–66.
Feynman, R.P., Leighton, R.B., and Sands, M. (1963) The Feynman Lectures in Physics, Addison-Wesley Publ. Co., Reading, MA.
Hemley, R.J. (1995) Turning off the water, Nature 378, 14.
Bauer, E. (1967) Theoretical Biology, in Hungarian (1935, in Russian).
Neumann, John von (1966) Theory of Self-Reproducing Automata, edited and completed by A. W. Burks, University of Illinois Press, Urbana and London, 80.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grandpierre, A. (2003). The Dynamics of Time and Timelessness: Philosophy, Physics and Prospects for our Life. In: Buccheri, R., Saniga, M., Stuckey, W.M. (eds) The Nature of Time: Geometry, Physics and Perception. NATO Science Series, vol 95. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0155-7_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0155-7_39
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1201-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0155-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive