Abstract
It is generally accepted that events have position in time and in space, but time is not space. The time we experience is qualitatively very different to the physical space in which we exist. For instance, we can move back and forth in space but not in time. Although this observation is predicated on a number of unstated and possibly unwarranted assumptions which we cannot go into here, it is significant. One of the great paradoxes of twentieth century physics was that relativity, in both its special (SR) and general (GR) forms, became very successful precisely because it ignored this and other basic differences. Moreover, in a number of scenarios discussed below, advances in physics were obtained by going further and turning time into a pure imaginary spatial co-ordinate. In this article we review some of the situations where this occurs, starting with special relativity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Minkowski, H. (1908) Space and Time, Address to the 80th Assembly of German Natural Scientists and Physicians, Cologne, 21 September 1908.
Einstein, A. (1905) Zur Electrodynamik bewegter Körper, Annalen der Physik 17, 891–921.
Particle Data Group (1994) Phys. Rev. D50, 1390; Review of Particle Physics (2000) Euro. Phys. Journal C15, 350.
Kochen, S. and Specker, E. (1967) The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics, Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17, 59–87.
Podolsky, B., Einstein, A. and Rosen, N. (1936) Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780.
Bohr, N. (1935) Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 48, 696–702.
Bell, J.S. (1964) On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox, Physics 1, 195–200; Bell, J.S. (1988) Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, CUP, Cambridge.
Aspect, A., Grangier, P. and Roger, G. (1982) Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A new violation of Bell’s inequalities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91–94.
Peres, A. (1993) Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dondrecht.
Bjorken, J.D. and Drell, S.D. (1964) Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Dirac, P.A.M. (1933) The Lagrangian in quantum mechanics, Phys. Zeit. der Sowjetunion 3 (1), 64–72.
Feynman, R.P. (1948) Space-time approach to non-relativistic quantum mechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 20 (2), 367–387.
Hartle, J.B. and Hawking, S.W. (1983) Wave function of the universe, Phys. Rev. D28, 2960–2975.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jaroszkiewicz, G. (2003). Analysis of the Relationship Between Real and Imaginary time in Physics. In: Buccheri, R., Saniga, M., Stuckey, W.M. (eds) The Nature of Time: Geometry, Physics and Perception. NATO Science Series, vol 95. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0155-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0155-7_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1201-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0155-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive