Nourishing Eroding Beaches: Examples from the West-Central Coast of Florida

  • Richard A. DavisJr.
Part of the Coastal Systems and Continental Margins book series (CSCM, volume 7)


Beach nourishment has been widespread and successful in Florida, and particularly so on the west coast of the peninsula. This highly developed coast has seen more than a dozen large-scale projects in past 20 years. The biggest problem with such projects along this coast is the limited sediment available. Most projects rely on the ebb-tidal deltas of tidal inlets but offshore sand bars are present along some coastal reaches.

The type of construction along with the distance traveled by the nourishment material from the borrow area dictates the cost of a given project. Three adjacent projects on Sand Key provide an excellent opportunity to assess the performance of different construction styles and borrow areas. Detailed monitoring of numerous profiles across the beach at each of the projects permits determination of shoreline changes and sediment volume lost during a given period of time. These data show that the Redington Beach project performed best in all respects over at least a four-year period whereas the Indian Shores Beach project performed the poorest. This can be attributed to the type of construction at each. It should be noted, however, that all three projects performed much better than predicted by the design specifications.


Barrier Island Shoreline Change Tidal Inlet Shoreline Position Beach Nourishment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Davis, R. A., Reversals in sediment transport along the Gulf coast of peninsular Florida. Amer. Soc. Civil. Engrs, Coastal Sediments, 1999, 761–769.Google Scholar
  2. Davis, R. A., Hine, A. C., and Shinn, E. A., Holocene coastal development on the Florida peninsula. SEPM Spec. Publ. No. 48, 1992, 193–212.Google Scholar
  3. Davis, R. A., Wang, P. and Silverman, B. R., Comparison of the performance of three adjacent and differently constructed beach nourishment projects on the Gulf peninsula of Florida. Jour. Coastal Research, 16: 2000, 396–407.Google Scholar
  4. Hine, A. C., Davis, R. A., Mearns, D. L., and Bland, M. P., Impact of Florida’s Gulf Coast Inlets on the Coastal Sand Budget, Univ. South Florida, Tampa, Florida, U.S.A., Rept. to Florida Dept. Natural Resources, 1984, 128 p.Google Scholar
  5. McKinney, M. L., Suwannee channel of the Paleogene coastal plain: support for the ‘carbonate suppressional model’ of basin formation. Geology, 12: 1984, 343–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. National Research Council, Beach Nourishment and Protection. Washington, D. C., National Academy Press, 1995, 334 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard A. DavisJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Coastal Research Laboratory, Department of GeologyUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations