Skip to main content

Successful Challenges during the Development and Application of Innovative Processes for the Bioremediation of Soils

  • Chapter
The Utilization of Bioremediation to Reduce Soil Contamination: Problems and Solutions

Part of the book series: NATO Science Series ((NAIV,volume 19))

  • 608 Accesses

Abstract

Remediation technology is selected for its ability to meet the desired cleanup goal. The conventional approach to soil cleanup has been incineration, solidification and excavation and disposal in a hazardous-waste landfill. Incineration has met public opposition and is costly. Solidification and excavation are not destructive treatment processes but simply immobilize the contamination or move it to a new location.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. National Research Council (1997) Innovations in Groundwater and Soil Cleanup: From Concept to Commercialization. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  2. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). (2000) An Analysis of Barriers to Innovative Treatment Technologies: Summary of Existing Studies and Current Initiatives, EPA 542-B-00-003, Cincinnati, OH

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ryan, M.J. and G. Ganapathi. (1997) Moving Innovative Technologies to the Field: An Engineering Perspective, in Bioremediation of Surface and Subsurface Contamination, R. Bajpai and M. Zappi (eds.), New York Academy of Science, New York, NY, Volume 829, pp 6–15.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mandates, G.C., J. A. Christ, G.D. Hopkins, P.L. McCarty and M.N. Goltz (1998) Remediation Technology Transfer from Full-Scale Demonstration to Implementation: A Case Study of Trichlorethylene Bioremediation, in Risk, Resource, and Regulatory Issues, Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, G. Wickramanayake and R. Hinchee (eds.), Battelle Press, Columbus, OH, pp 235–240.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hund, G.(1998) Stakeholder Involvement-Free Consulting that Results in Enduring Decisions, in Risk, Resource and Regulatory Issues, Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds., G. Wickramanayake and R. Hinchee (eds.), Battelle Press, Columbus, OH pp 211–216.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Glass, D. (2000) International Remediation Markets: Perspectives and Trends, in Risk, Regulatory and Monitoring Considerations, Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, G. Wickramanayake, in A. Gavaskar, M.E. Kelley, and K. Nehring (eds.), Battelle Press, Columbus, OH, pp 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Devine, K. (1995) U.S. Bioremediation Market: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow, in Applied Bioremediation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons, R. Hinchee, J. Kittel, and J. Reisinger (eds.), Bioremediation 3(6) pp 53–59. Battelle Press, Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Devine, K. and P. LaGoy, (1998) Regulatory Issues Applied to Bioremediation as a Risk Reduction Technology, in Bioremediation: Principles and Practices. Volume III Bioremediation Technologies. S. Sikdar and R. Irvine (eds.), Technomic Publishing Co., Lancaster, PA, pp 195–222.

    Google Scholar 

  9. SBA (Small Business Administration). Bridging the Valley of Death: Financing Technology for a Sustainable Future. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jerger, D. and P. Woodhull (2000) Applications and Costs for the Biological Treatment of Explosives-Contaminated Soils in the U.S, in Biodegradation of Nitroaromatic Compounds and Explosives, J. Spain, J. Hughes, H. Knackmuss (eds.), Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL pp 395–424.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Broder, M.F. and R.F. Westmoreland (1998) An Estimate of Soils Contaminated with Secondary Explosives. Report No. SFIM-AEC-ET-CR-98002. U.S. Army Environmental Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Spain, J. (2000) Introduction, in Biodegradation of Nitroaromatic Compounds and Explosives, J. Spain, J. Hughes, H. Knackmuss eds. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL. pp 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. PSC (Plexus Scientific Corporation) (1999) U.S. Army Environmental Center Biotechnology Demonstration” Final Report, SFIM-AEC-ET-CR-99012. U.S. Army Environmental Center, Aberdeen, MD.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jerger, D.E. (2003). Successful Challenges during the Development and Application of Innovative Processes for the Bioremediation of Soils. In: Šašek, V., Glaser, J.A., Baveye, P. (eds) The Utilization of Bioremediation to Reduce Soil Contamination: Problems and Solutions. NATO Science Series, vol 19. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0131-1_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0131-1_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1142-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0131-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics