Abstract
A simple question arises from the few topics studied in this book: where the aim is that students should learn, is research at all relevant to practice, as far as teaching physics at the secondary school and university levels is concerned? What should they learn? That is not so simple, since the “what” and “how” of teaching are interworven. Ideally, or perhaps this is a necessary condition, students should at least enjoy the learning process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Guesne, E. 1984. Children’s ideas about light / les conceptions des enfants sur la lumière, New Trends in Physics Teaching, Vol IV UNESCO, Paris, pp. 179–192.
Johsua S. 1994. Quelques conditions d’évolution d’un objet d’enseignement en physique: l’exemple des circuits électriques (1902–1980). In G. Arsac, A. Tiberghien & Y. Chevallard (Eds): La Transposition didactique à l’épreuve, pp. 9–34.
Johsua, S. 1996. L’évolution des conceptions des physiciens et l’enseignement des circuits électriques. In B. Belhoste, H. Gispert & N. Hulin (Eds.): Les Sciences au lycée. Un siècle de réforme de l’enseignement des mathématiques et de la physique en France et à l’étranger. Paris: INRP, pp. 129–152.
Johsua, S. & Dupin J.J. 1987. Taking into account student conceptions in an instructional stategy: an example in Physics, Cognition and Instruction, 4(2), pp. 117–135.
Johsua, S. & Dupin J.J. 1988. Représentations et modélisations: le “débat scientifique” dans la classe et l’apprentissage de la Physique. Genève: Peter Lang.
Kaminski, W. 1991. Optique élémentaire en classe de quatrième: raisons et impact sur les maîtres d’une maquette d’enseignement, Thesis ( L.D.P.E.S.), University of Paris 7 “Denis Diderot”.
Leach, J. & Scott, P. 2000. The concept of learning demand as a tool for designing teaching sequences, unpublished communication, International workshop (University Paris 7 “Denis Diderot“): Designing and validating teaching-learning sequences in a research perspective, CSME, University of Leeds.
Leach, J. & Scott, P. 2002. Designing and Evaluating Science Teaching Sequences: An Approach Drawing upon the Concept of Learning Demand and a Social Constructivist perspective. Studies in Science Education, 38, pp. 115–142.
Leach, J. & Paulsen, A.C. (Eds.) 1999. Practical work in Science Education. Lyon: University of Lyon 2.
Lubben, F. & Millar, R. 1996. Children’s ideas about the reliability of experimental data, International Journal of Science Education, 18(8), pp. 955–968.
Maury, L., Saltiel, E. & Viennot, L. 1977. Etude de la notion de mouvement chez l’enfant à partir des changements de repère, Revue Française de Pédagogie, 40, pp. 15–29.
Ministère de l’Education Nationale 1992. Bulletin Officiel du Ministère de l’Education Nationale et de la Culture, 31, Classes de quatrième et quatrième technologique, pp. 2086–2112.
Séré, M.G., Leach, J., Niedderer, H., Psillos, D., Tiberghien, A. & Vicentini M. 1998 Labwork in Science Education, Final report. European Commission, DG XII, Contract SOE2 CT 95 2001.
Viennot, L. 1994. Recherche en didactique et nouveaux programmes d’enseignement: convergences. Exemple du programme de Physique de quatrième 1993 en France, Didaskalia 3, pp. 119–128.
Viennot, L. & Chauvet, F. 1997. Two dimensions to characterise research-based teaching strategies, International Journal of Science Education, 19(10), pp. 1159–1168.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Viennot, L. (2003). Conclusion. In: Viennot, L. (eds) Teaching Physics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0121-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0121-2_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1276-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0121-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive