Abstract
Reception or transmission studies are not, of course, something new. There have been studies discussing the diffusion of the new ideas about nature in England, Scotland, France, the Low Countries and Germany during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Many problems related to the reforms by Peter the Great in Russia have also been analyzed. There have been studies on the introduction of the new scientific ideas in Latin America. So is the case for many aspects of science in the Scandinavian countries. Furthermore, there have been many studies on the question of science, technology and imperialism. There have also been accounts of the establishment of university chairs in many countries. The introduction of modern physics in a number of countries is also well documented. The reactions to the Darwinian theory have been the subject of serious scholarship. Nevertheless, studies in languages other than the local languages for the Balkans, the Ottoman Empire, the Central European countries, the Baltic countries, Portugal, but also Spain have been very few and mostly from a philological point of view. The lack of studies for any subject by itself does not, of course, constitute a legitimate reason for starting to work on it; nevertheless, recent developments in the history of science raised many interesting historical questions to warrant an analytical discussion of these issues (Gavroglu 1999, Abartouy et al. 2001).
John Stachel has not only been a very astute observer of what is happening in the uneasy and, perhaps, dangerous times we are living. John is in fact the kind of intellectual Karl Marx must have had in mind when he wrote the 11th thesis on Feuerbach: The point is not (only?) to understand the world but to change it. Though such changes implied by the 11th thesis have proven to be excruciatingly difficult, it is an optimistic sign to know that there are still people like John, with such a committed agenda to what has been envisioned more than 150 years ago.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abattouy, M., J. Renn, and P. Weinig. 2001. “Transmission as Transformation: The translation movements in the Medieval East and West in a comparative perspective.” Science in Context 14:1–12.
Alexander, H.G. ed. 1956. The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Carriero, J. 1990. “Newton on Space and Time: Comments on J.E. McGuire” Pp. 109–133 in Philosophical Perspectives on Newtonian Science, eds. P. Bricker and R.I.G. Hughes. Cambridge, MA-London: The MIT Press.
Carvin, W.P. 1972. “Leibniz on Motion and Creation.” Journal of the History of Ideas 33:425–438.
Casini, P. 1988. “Newton’s Principia and the Philosophers of the Enlightenment.” Pp. 35–52 in Newton’s Principia and its Legacy. Proceedings of a Royal Society discussion meeting, held on 30 June 1987, eds. D.G. King-Hele and A.R. Hall. London: The Royal Society.
Cassirer, E. 1943. “Newton and Leibniz.” The Philosophical Review 52:366–391.
Cohen, LB. and A. Koyré. 1962. “Newton and the Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence.” Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Sciences 15:63–126.
Cohen, I. B. and A. Whitman. 1999. Isaac Newton, The Principia. Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. A new translation. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
Dialetis, D., K. Gavroglu, and M. Patiniotis. 1999. “The Sciences in the Greek-speaking Regions during the 17th and 18th Centuries.” Pp. 41–72 in (Gavroglu 1999).
Force, J.E. 1987. “Science, Deism and William Whiston’s ‘Third Way’.” Ideas and Production: A Journal in the History of Ideas 7:18–33.
Gavroglu, Kostas. ed. 1999. “The Sciences in the European periphery During the Enlightenment.” In Archimedes, v. 2, series ed. Jed Buchwald. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gay, Peter. 1972. “Why was Enlightenment?” Pp. 61–71 in 18th Century Studies, idem ed. New Hampshire: University Press of New England.
Guerrini, A. 1985. “James Keill, George Cheyne, and Newtonian physiology, 1690–1740.” Journal of the History of Biology 18:247–266.
Iltis, C. 1977. “Madame du Châtelet’s metaphysics and mechanics.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 8:29–48.
Klein, Jacob. 1985. “The World of Physics and the ‘Natural’ World.” Pp. 1–34 in idem, Lectures and Essays, eds. Robert Williamson and Elliott Zuckerman. Annapolis, MD: St. John’s College Press.
Liddell, H.G. and R. Scott. A Greek-English Lexicon, (electronic version at http://www.perseus.tufts.edu).
Madame du Châtelet (Gabrielle-Émilie le Tonnelier de Breteuil, Marquise du Châtelet). 1742. Institutions Physiques adressées à Mr. son Fils. Amsterdam (first edition 1740).
McGuire, J.E. 1978. “Existence, Actuality and Necessity: Newton on Space and Time.” Annals of Science 35:463–508.
—. 1990. “Predicates of Pure Existence: Newton on God’s Space and Time.” Pp. 91–108 in Philosophical Perspectives on Newtonian Science, eds. P. Bricker and R.I.G. Hughes. Cambridge, MA-London: The MIT Press.
Schaffer, S. 1980. “Natural Philosophy.” Pp. 55–91 in The Ferment of Knowledge: Studies in the historiography of eighteenth-century science, eds. G.S. Rousseau and R. Porter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, C. B. 1983. Aristotle and the Renaissance. Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press.
—. 1984. The Aristotelian Tradition and Renaissance Universities. London: Variorum reprints.
Thijssen, J.M.M.H. 1992. “David Hume and John Keill and the Structure of Continua.” Journal of the History of Ideas 53:271–286.
Tsourkas, Cl. 1967. Les débuts de l’enseignement philosophique et la libre pensée dans les Balkans. La vie et l’oeuvre de Théophile Corydalée (1570–1646), 2nd revised edition. Thessaloniki (originally published in 1948).
Ventouri, F. 1972. “The European Enlightenment.” Pp. 1–33 in idem, Italy and the Enlightenment: Studies in a Cosmopolitan Century, ed. Stuart Woolf. London: Longman.
Voulgaris, E. 1805. Metaphysics. Venice (in Greek).
—. 1805. Placita Philosophorum. Vienna (in Greek).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gavroglu, K., Patiniotis, M. (2003). Patterns of Appropriation in the Greek Intellectual Life of the 18th Century. In: Renn, J., et al. Revisiting the Foundations of Relativistic Physics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0111-3_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0111-3_29
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1285-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0111-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive