Advertisement

The Man of Professional Wisdom

  • Kathryn Pyne Addelson
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 161)

Abstract

Most of us are introduced to scientific knowledge by our schoolteachers, in classrooms and laboratories, using textbooks and lab manuals as guides. As beginners, we believe that the goal of science is “the growth of knowledge through new scientific discoveries.”1 We believe that the methods of science are the most rational that human kind has devised for investigating the world and that (practiced properly) they yield objective knowledge. It seems to us that because there is only one reality, there can be only one real truth, and that science describes those facts. Our teachers and our texts affirm this authority of scientific specialists.

Keywords

Scientific Understanding Scientific Specialist Social Arrangement Chief Investigator Scientific Profession 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Addelson, Kathryn Pyneand Martha Ackelsberg: (n.d.), An Endless Waterfall: Studies on Women and Social Change, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  2. Ardener, E.: 1972, ‘Belief and the Problem of Women,’ in J. S. LaFontaine (ed.), The Interpretation of Ritual (London: Tavistock).Google Scholar
  3. Ardener, E.: 1975, ‘The Problem Revisited,’ in S. Ardener (ed.), Perceiving Women (London: Malaby Press).Google Scholar
  4. Aubert, Vilhelm: 1965, The Hidden Society, (New Jersey: Bedminster Press).Google Scholar
  5. Becker, Howard S.: 1973, Outsiders (New York: The Free Press).Google Scholar
  6. Blumer, H.: 1967, ‘Society as Symbolic Interaction,’ in J. Manis and B. Mattzer (eds.), Symbolic Interaction, (Boston: Allyn and Bacon).Google Scholar
  7. Carnap, Rudolf: 1956, ‘The Methodological Character of Theoretical Concepts,’ in H. Feigl and N. Scriven (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol I, (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press). Cole, Jonathan R.: 1979, Fair Science, Women in the Scientific Community (New York: The Free Press).Google Scholar
  8. Cole, J. and S. Cole: 1973, Social Stratification in Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  9. Collingwood, R. G.: 1946, The Idea of History (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  10. Daniels, Arlene: 1979, ‘Advocacy Research: Providing New Wares for the Free Marketplace of Ideas,’ in Sociology’s Relations with the Community (Calgary: University of Calgary Colloquium Proceedings).Google Scholar
  11. Debro, Julius: 1970, ‘Dialogue with Howard S. Becker,’ Issues in Criminology 5(2, Summer).Google Scholar
  12. Feyerabend, P.: 1970, ‘Against Method,’ in M. Radner and S. Winokur (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. IV. (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).Google Scholar
  13. Green, Philip: 1981, The Pursuit of Inequality (New York: Pantheon Books).Google Scholar
  14. Hanson, N. R.: 1958, Patterns of Discovery (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  15. Haraway, Donna: 1978, ‘Animal Sociology and a Natural Economy of the Body Politic,’ Parts I and II, Signs 4 21–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haraway, Donna: 1979, ‘The Biological Enterprise: Sex, Mind and Profit from Human Engineering to Sociobiology,’ Radical History Review, Spring-Summer special issue, 206–237.Google Scholar
  17. Kuhn, T.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, second edition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  18. Matza, David: 1969, Becoming Deviant (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
  19. Merton, Robert K.: 1949, Social Theory and Social Structure (Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press).Google Scholar
  20. Millman, M. and R. Kanter: 1915, Another Voice (New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday).Google Scholar
  21. Milton, Kay: 1979, ‘Male Bias in Anthropology,’ Man, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, London, N.S. 14, 40–54.Google Scholar
  22. Mullins, N. C.: 1973, Science: Some Sociological Perspectives (New York: Bobbs-Merrill Co.).Google Scholar
  23. Popper, Karl: 1965, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, second edition (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
  24. Rescher, Nicholas: 1978, Scientific Progress (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).Google Scholar
  25. Reskin, Barbara F.: 1978, ‘Sex Differentiation and the Social Organization of Science,’ Sociological Inquiry 48(3-4).Google Scholar
  26. Sherif, Carolyn Wood: 1979, ‘Bias in Psychology,’ in Sherman and Beck (eds.) (1979), 93–124.Google Scholar
  27. Sherman, Julia A. and Evelyn Torton Beck: 1979, The Prism of Sex (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press).Google Scholar
  28. Spector, Malcolm and John Kitsuse (eds.): 1977, Constructing Social Problems (Menlo Pk., Cal.: Cummings Press).Google Scholar
  29. Young, R. M.: 1969, ‘Malthus and the Evolutionists,’ Past and Present 43, 109–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Winch, Peter: 1958, The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathryn Pyne Addelson
    • 1
  1. 1.Smith CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations