Skip to main content

Risk-Based Ranking Experiences for Cold War Legacy Facilities in the United States

  • Chapter
Risk Methodologies for Technological Legacies

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NAIV,volume 18))

  • 81 Accesses

Abstract

Over the past two decades a number of government agencies in the United States have faced increasing public scrutiny for their efforts to address the wide range of potential environmental issues related to Cold War legacies. Risk-based ranking was selected as a means of defining the relative importance of issues. Ambitious facility-wide risk-based ranking applications were undertaken. However although facility-wide risk-based ranking efforts can build invaluable understanding of the potential issues related to Cold War legacies, conducting such efforts is difficult because of the potentially enormous scope and the potentially strong institutional barriers. The U.S. experience is that such efforts are worth undertaking to start building a knowledge base and infrastructure that are based on a thorough under standing of risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Droppo, J.G. Jr., Buck, J.W., Strenge, D.L., and Hoopes, B.L. (1993) Risk computation for environmental restoration activities, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 35 341–352.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Buck, J.W., Gelston, G.M., and Farris, W.T. (1995) Integrated Risk Assessment Program: Scoring Methods and Results of Public Health Impacts from the Hanford High-Level Waste Tanks. PNL-10725, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Buck, J.W., Bagaasen, L.M., Bergeron, M.P., Streile, G.P., Staven, L.H., Castleton, K.J., Gelston, G.M., Strenge, D.L., Krupka, K.M., Serne, R.J., and Ikenberry, T.A. (1997) Analysis of the Long-term Impacts of TRU Waste Remaining at Generator/Storage Sites for No Action Alternative 2. Support Information for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Disposal-Phase Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. PNNL-11251, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jarvis, T.T., Andrews, W.B., Buck, J.W., Gelston, G.M., Husties, L.R., Miley, T.B., and Peffers, M.S. (1998) Risk-Based Requirements for Long-Term Stewardship: A Proof-of-Principle Analysis of an Analytic Method Tested on Selected Hanford Locations. PNNL-11852, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. U.S. National Research Council. (1994) Ranking Hazardous Waste Sites. National Research Council, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Laniak, G.F. et al. (1997) An overview of multimedia benchmarking analysis for three risk assessment models: RESRAD, MMSOILS and MEPAS. Risk Analysis, 17(2) 203–214.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mills, W.E. et al. (1997) Multimedia benchmarking analysis for three risk assessment models: RESRAD, MMSOILS, and MEPAS. Risk Analysis, 17(2) 187–202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Federal Register. (1990) Hazard Ranking System; Final Rule (55 FR 51532), December 14, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1992) The Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual; Interim Final, November 1992. NTIS PB92–963377, EPA 9345.92–963377, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Camus, H., Little, R., Acton, D., Agro, A., Chambers, D., Chamney, L., Doroussin, J.L., Droppo, J.G., Ferry, C., Gnanapragosam, E., Hallam, C., Horyna, J., Lush, D., Stammose, D., Takahashi, T., Toro, L., and Yu, C. (1999) Long term contaminant migration and impacts from uranium mill tailings, J. Environmental Radioactivity, 42, 289–304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Buck, J.W., Whelan, G., Droppo, J.G., Jr., Strenge, D.L., Castleton, K.J., McDonald, J.P., Sato C., and Streile, G.P. (1995) Multimedia Environmental Pollutant Assessment System (MEPAS) Application Guidance, Guidelines for Evaluating MEPAS Input Parameters for Version 3.1. PNL-10395, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Whelan, G., Castleton, K.J., Buck, J.W., Gelston, G.M., Hoopes, B.L., Pelton, M.A., Strenge, D.L., and R.N. Rickert. (1997) Concepts of a Framework for Risk Analysis In Multimedia Environmental Systems (FRAMES). PNNL-11748. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Buck, J.W., McDonald, J.P., Pelton, M.A., Lundgren, R.E., Whelan, G., Castleton, K.J., Gelston, G.M., Hoopes, B.L., and Taira, R.Y. (1998) Documentation for the FRAMES-HWIR Technology Software System Volume 2: System User Interface. PNNL-11914, Vol. 2, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Buck, J.W., Castleton, K.J., Pelton, M.A., Hoopes, B.L., Lundgren, R.E., Gelston, G.M., Whelan, G., Taira, R.Y., and McDonald, J.P. (1998) Documentation for the FRAMES-HWIR Technology Software System Volume 11: System User’s Guide. PNNL-11914, Vol. 11, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Whelan, G. and Laniak, G.F. (1998) A risk-based approach for a national assessment, in C.H. Benson, J.N. Meegoda, R.B. Gilbert, and S.P. Clemence (eds.), Risk-Based Corrective Action and Brownfields Restorations, Geotechnical Special Publication Number 82., American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, pp. 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  16. FR 66344–469 (1995) Hazardous waste management system: identification and listing of hazardous waste: Hazardous Waste Identification Rule (HWIR), Federal Register, Thursday, December 21, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Whelan, G., Jr., Buck, J.W., Strenge, D.L., Droppo, J.G., Jr., and Hoopes, B.L. (1992) Overview of the Multimedia Environmental Pollutant Assessment System (MEPAS). Journal of Hazardous Waste and Materials 9(2) 191–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. U.S. Department of Energy. (1988) Environmental Survey Preliminary Summary Report of the Defense Production Facilities. DOE/EH-0072, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Droppo, J.G., Jr., Strenge, D.L., Buck, J.W., Hoopes, B.L., Brockhaus, R.D., Walter, M.B., and Whelan, G. (1989) Multimedia Environmental Pollutant Assessment System (MEPAS) Application Guidance Volume 1 - User’s Guide (for MEPAS Version 2). PNL-7216, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Droppo, J.G., Jr., Strenge, D.L., Buck, J.W., Hoopes, B.L., Brockhaus, R.D., Walter, M.B., and Whelan. G. (1989) Multimedia Environmental Pollutant Assessment System (MEPAS) Application Guidance Volume 2 - Guidelines for Evaluating MEPAS Parameters (for MEPAS Version 2). PNL-7216, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Strenge, D.L., and Peterson, S.R. (1989) Chemical Data Bases for the Multimedia Environmental Pollutant Assessment System (MEPAS): Version 1. PNL-7145, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Droppo, J.G., Jr., Buck, J.W., Strenge, D.L., and Siegel, M.R. (1990) Analysis of Health Impact Inputs to the U.S. Department of Energy’s Risk Information System. PNL-7432, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Longo, T.P., Witfield, R.P., Cotton, T.A., and Merkhofer, M.W. (1990) DOE’s formal priority system for funding environmental cleanup. Federal Facilities Environmental Journal 1(2) 219–231.

    Google Scholar 

  24. U.S. Department of Energy. (1994) Hanford Remedial Action Draft Environmental Impact Statement Volumes I and II. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Strenge, D.L., and Chamberlain, P.J., II. (1994) Evaluation of Unit Risk Factors in Support of the Hanford Remedial Action Environmental Impact Statement. PNL-10190, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Gelston, G.M., Jarvis, M.F., Von Berg, R., and Warren, B.R. (1995) Risk Information in Support of Cost Estimates for the Baseline Environmental Management Report (BEMR): Section I, Development and Applications of Unit Risk Factor Methodology: Nevada Test Site. PNL-10608, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Whelan, G., Buck, J.W., and Nazarali, A. (1994) Modular risk analysis for assessing multiple waste sites. In Proceedings of the U.S. DOE Integrated Planning Workshop, U.S. Department of Energy, Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  28. U.S. Department of Energy. (1995) Estimating the Cold War Mortgage, The 1995 Baseline Environmental Management Report, Volumes I and II. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Doctor, P.G., Miley, T.B., and Cowan, C.E. (1990) Multimedia Environmental Pollutant Assessment System (MEPAS) Sensitivity Analysis of Computer Codes. PNL-7296, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Whelan, G., Strenge, D.L., Droppo, J.G., Jr., and Steelman, B.L. (1987) The Remedial Action Priority System (RAPS): Mathematical Formulations. PNL-6200, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Droppo, J.G., Jr., Whelan, G., Buck, J.W., Strenge, D.L., Hoopes, B.L., and Walter, M.B. (1989) Supplemental Mathematical Formulations: The Multimedia Environmental Pollutant Assessment System (MEPAS). PNL-7201, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  32. EPA. (1988) Analysis of Alternatives to the Superfund Hazard Ranking System. prepared by Industrial Economics, Incorporated, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Moskowitz, P.D., Pardi, R., Fthenakis, V.M., Holtzman, S., Sun, L.C., and Irla, B. (1996) An evaluation of three representative multimedia models used to support cleanup decision-making at hazardous, mixed, and radioactive waste sites, Risk Analysis, 16(2), 279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Intera Information Technologies Corporation. (1992) Review and Assessment of Two Multimedia Exposure Models: MEPAS and MUITIMED. Intera Information Technologies Corporation, Environmental Sciences Division, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bley, D.C., Droppo, J.G., Eremenko, V.A., Lundgren, R. (2003). Risk-Based Ranking Experiences for Cold War Legacy Facilities in the United States. In: Bley, D.C., Droppo, J.G., Eremenko, V.A., Lundgren, R. (eds) Risk Methodologies for Technological Legacies. NATO ASI Series, vol 18. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0097-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0097-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1258-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0097-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics