Skip to main content

The Origination of the Concept of Multiplicity Through that of the Collective Combination

  • Chapter
  • 1154 Accesses

Part of the book series: Edmund Husserl ((HUCO,volume 10))

Abstract

The well-known definition of the concept of number — as we may more briefly say in place of “whole number,” conforming to the common way of speaking — is: The number is a multiplicity of units. Since Euclid1 used it, this definition has returned again and again. Instead of “multiplicity,” the words “plurality,” “totality,” “aggregate,” “collection,” “group,” etc., are also used, all names of the same or almost the same signification, although not without appreciable nuances.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. At the beginning of Book VII of the Elements.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Until explicitly indicated, we will refrain from excluding these nuances by using one of the names alone. The reasons why we prefer different names in different expositions (now “totality,” now “multiplicity” or “group”) will be explained later. see pp. 100, 146 and 155n.DW

    Google Scholar 

  3. De arte combinatoria (1666), Opera philosophica, Ed. J. E. Erdmann, Berlin 1840, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Book II, ch. XVI, sect. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  5. John Stuart Mill, A System of Logic, London 1970, Book III, ch. XXIV, §5. See also Book II, ch. IV, §7, where the character of number is deemed parallel to the physical characteristics of color, weight and extension. We frequently find analogous views also among mathematicians. Frege cites examples in his Grundlagen der Arithmetik, Breslau 1884, pp. 27ff.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Franz Brentano speaks here of “metaphysical” combination, and Carl Stumpf (Über den psychologischen Ursprung der Raumvorstellung, Leipzig 1873, p. 9) of the relationship of “psychological parts.”

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Husserl, E. (2003). The Origination of the Concept of Multiplicity Through that of the Collective Combination. In: Philosophy of Arithmetic. Edmund Husserl, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0060-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0060-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1603-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0060-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics