You’re Taking Us Where?

Reaction And Response To A Guided Art Museum Fieldtrip
  • Meg Black
  • George E. Hein
Part of the Landscapes: The Arts, Aesthetics, and Education book series (LAAE, volume 2)


Fifteen undergraduate students enrolled in an Introduction to Art Education class at an urban women’s liberal arts college participated in a guided field trip to the Museum of Fine Arts (MFA), Boston. The goals of the trip were threefold: (1) to take in the gestalt of the museum to familiarise the students with its architectural space; (2) to examine in detail as a group, fourteen works of art highlighted on a museum supplied map, and (3) for the instructor, Meg Black, to study the students’ museum experiences. This study, guided by George Hein, was designed to elucidate how this group of students from different social and ethnic backgrounds and with varying previous art experiences felt about the trip to the museum as expressed through a series of follow up assignments. The post-museum assignments — student writing, drawing, interviews and survey — yielded rich data and proved to be an insightful learning experience for both instructor and students. Analysis of the data supports the concept that personal meaning making is a significant factor in visitors’ responses to museums, even when the visit is highly structured. No simple, unidimensional categorisation of visitors adequately describes the breadth of responses to a single visit. Because individuals have different life experiences, different levels of perceptual skills and different expectations about any impending event, in this case an art museum field trip, instructors cannot expect to find a single “right” way to bring a group of diverse individuals to a museum.


Field Trip Previous Visit Student Paper Page Paper Experienced Visitor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly, and Rick Robinson. The Art of Seeing. Malibu, CA: J. Paul Getty Museum and Getty Center for Education in the Arts, 1990.Google Scholar
  2. Denzin, Norman K. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.Google Scholar
  3. Dewey, John. How We Think, Boston: D. C. Heath, 1933.Google Scholar
  4. Falk, John, and Lynn Dierking. Learning from Museums. New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. Getty Center for Education in the Arts. Insights: Museums, Visitors, Attitudes, Expectations. Malibu, CA: Getty Center for Education in the Arts and the J. Paul Getty Museum, 1991.Google Scholar
  6. Hein, George E. Learning in the Museum. London: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. Hiss, Tony. The Experience of Place. New York: A. A. Knopf, Inc. 1990.Google Scholar
  8. Hood, Marilyn. “Staying Away: Why People Choose Not To Visit Museums.” Museum News, 61.4 (April 1983) 50–57Google Scholar
  9. Lofland, John, and Lyn, Lofland. Analyzing Social Settings. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1971.Google Scholar
  10. Langer, Suzanne. “The Symbol of Feeling.” Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Criticism. Marvin Levich. (ed.). New York: Random House, 1963. 334–351.Google Scholar
  11. May, Wanda. “Teachers-as-researchers or Action Research: What is it, and What Good Is It for Art Education?” Studies in Art Education, 34.2 (1993): 114–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McDermott-Lewis, Melora. The Denver Art Museum Interpretive Project, Denver, CO: Denver Art Museum, 1990.Google Scholar
  13. Melton, Maureen. Museum of Fine Arts, Boston (Art Spaces). Boston: MFA Publications, 2002.Google Scholar
  14. Patton, Michael Quinn. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1990.Google Scholar
  15. Retsila-Anzoulatou, E. (1996) “The Museum as Artificial Environment and the Experience of Place and Time in It,” in E. Karpodini-Dimitriadi (ed.) Ethnography of European Traditional Cultures: Society, Cultural Tradition, Built Environment. Athens: Singular Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Rounds, Jay. (ed.). Meaning Making in Exhibits. The Exhibitionist 18.2 (Fall) 1999.Google Scholar
  17. Schloder, John E. The Visitor’s Voice: The Cleveland Museum of Art. Malibu, CA: Getty Center for Education in the Arts, 1990.Google Scholar
  18. Schon, Donald. The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books, 1983.Google Scholar
  19. Silverman, Lois. H. “Visitor Meaning-Making in Museums for a New Age.” Curator, 38.3 (1995) 161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Worts, Douglas. “Making Meaning in Museums: There’s a Lot to Learn,” Pathways to Partnerships: Linking Collections with Educators, Curators, Guides, and the Community: Museum Education of Association of Australia and Museum Education Association of New Zealand Conference Proceedings. Melbourne, Australia: Museum Education Association of Australia (Victoria Branch), 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meg Black
  • George E. Hein
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Arts and Social Sciences at Lesley CollegeCambridge

Personalised recommendations