Museum Education and Research-based Practice
  • Maria Xanthoudaki
  • Les Tickle
  • Veronica Sekules
Part of the Landscapes: The Arts, Aesthetics, and Education book series (LAAE, volume 2)


During the final decades of the twentieth century, the emphasis which museums and galleries placed on their education programmes shifted from a quantitative exercise to a qualitative one. While in the 1980s there was an urgency about using educational visits to increase visitor numbers, the following decade saw an increasing interest in questions of intellectual and physical access. Governments and museum institutions alike, especially local authorities responsible for museum policies, began to recognise their potential as stimuli in the fields of formal and informal education. Research, under the aegis initially of powerful foundations such as the Getty Institute for art education in America, was demonstrating increasingly that museum education could change people. Case studies were mounting which showed that new issues were being raised through museum education, that it could be empowering for the learner, leading to revelatory moments of understanding. The 1990s saw an increasing professionalisation of the practices of education. After a shaky start, during which time new museum education posts looked vulnerable, there are now scarcely any museums, throughout the world, which do not provide educational programmes and ‘interactive’ resources associated with displays and events as a regular feature of their work.


Informal Education Museum Education Cultural Exclusiveness Museum Experience Aesthetic Encounter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bennett, Tony, The Birth of the Museum. London and New York: Routledge. 1995Google Scholar
  2. Bourdieu, Pierre. Outline of a Sociological Theory of Art Perception, The Field of Cultural Production. Cambridge: Polity Press. 1993, 215–237.Google Scholar
  3. Burke, Penny J. Accessing Education, effectively widening participation. Stoke on Trent, Sterling VA: Trentham Books. 2002.Google Scholar
  4. Crotty, Michael. The Foundations of Social Research. London: Sage. 1998.Google Scholar
  5. Csikszentmihalyi, Mihalyi, and Rick E. Robinson. The Art of Seeing: An Interpretation of the Aesthetic Encounter. Malibu, CA: The J. Paul Getty Museum and the Getty Center for Education in the Arts. 1990.Google Scholar
  6. Falk, Johnb H. and Lynn D. Dierking. The Museum Experience. Washington DC: Whalesback Books. 1992.Google Scholar
  7. Hein, George. Learning in the Museum. London: Routledge. 1998.Google Scholar
  8. Hooper-Greenhill, Eileen. Museum and Gallery Education. Leicester: Leicester university Press. 1991.Google Scholar
  9. Sekules, V., L. Tickle & M. Xanthoudaki. Seeking Art Expertise: Experiences of Primary School Teachers, Journal of In-Service Education, 25/3 (1999): 571–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Stenhouse, Lawrence. An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. London: Heinemann. 1975.Google Scholar
  11. Taylor, Rod. Educating for Art. London: Longman. 1986.Google Scholar
  12. Tickle, Les. Understanding Art in Primary Schools. London: Routledge. 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Weil, Stephen E. Making Museums Matter. Washington DC and London: Smithsonian Institution Press. 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Xanthoudaki
    • 1
  • Les Tickle
    • 2
  • Veronica Sekules
  1. 1.Faculty of ArchitecturePolitecnico di MilanoItaly
  2. 2.University of East AngliaNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations