Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Resource-Sensitivity, Binding and Anaphora pp 257–289Cite as

Some Precursors

  • Chapter

  • 135 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 80))

Abstract

The idea of treating anaphoric elements as functions has a variety of antecedents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ades, Anthony and Steedman, Mark (1982). On the order of words. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4:517–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, Emmon (1979). Control in Montague Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, Emmon and Partee, Barbara (1980). Anaphora and semantic structure. In Krieman, K. J. and Ojeda, A. E., editors, Papers from the Parasession on Pronouns and Anaphora. Chicago Linguistic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam (1982). Some concepts and consequences of the theory of Government and Binding. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph Six. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachsetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Robin (1979). The interpretation of pronouns. In Heny, Frank and Schnelle, Helmut, editors, Selections from the Third Groningen Round Table, volume 10 of Syntax and Semantics, pages 61–92. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Robin (1983). Quantification and Syntactic Theory, volume 21 of Synthese Language Library: Texts and Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, Max (1972). Logics and Languages. Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, Dick and van Genabith, Josef (1999). Context change, underspecifi-cation, and the structure of glue language derivations. In Dalrymple, Mary, editor, Semantics and Syntax in Lexical Functional Grammar: The Resource Logic Approach, pages 117–189. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple, Mary (1993). The Syntax of Anaphoric Binding. Number 30 in Lecture Notes. CSLI, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple, Mary, editor (1999). Semantcs and Syntax in Lexical Functional Grammar: The Resource Logic Approach. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple, Mary, Kaplan, Ronald, John T. Maxwell, III, and Zaenen, Annie, editors (1995). Formal Issues in Lexical Functional Grammar. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple, Mary, Lamping, John, Pereira, Fernando, and Saraswat, Vijay (1999). Quantification, anaphora, and intensionality. In Dalrymple, Mary, editor, Semantics and Syntax in Lexical Functional Grammar: The Resource Logic Approach, pages 39–89. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David (1980). Comments on the paper by Bach and Partee. In Krieman, K. J. and Ojeda, A. E., editors, Papers from the Parasession on Pronouns and Anaphora. Chicago Linguistic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David (1982a). Grammatical relations and Montague Grammar. In Jacobson, Pauline and Pullum, Geoffrey, editors, The Nature of Syntactic Representation. D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David (1982b). More on the categorial analysis of grammatical relations. In Zaenen, A., editor, Subjects and Other Subjects: Proceedings of the Harvard Conference on Grammatical Relations. Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl, Elisabet (1986). Constituent Questions. D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faltz, Leonard M. (1985). Reflexivization: A Study in Universal Syntax. Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics. Garland Publishing, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girard, Jean-Yves (1987). Linear logic. Theoretical Computer Science, 50:1–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, Jeroen and Stokhof, Martin (1982). Semantic analysis of wh-complements. Linguistics and Philosophy, 5:175–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, Jeroen and Stokhof, Martin (1983). Interrogative quantifiers and skolem functions. In Ehlich, K. and van Riemsdijk, H., editors, Connectedness in Sentence, Discourse and Text, number 4 in Tilburg Studies in Language and Literature. Tilburg University, Tilburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepple, Mark (1990). The Grammar and Processing of Order and Dependency: A Categorial Approach. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindley, J. Roger and Seldin, Jonathan P. (1986). Introduction to Combinators and λ-Calculus, volume 1 of London Mathematical Society Student Texts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Pauline (1991). Bach-Peters sentences in a variable-free semantics. In Dekker, Paul and Stokhof, Martin, editors, Proceedings of the Eighth Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam. ILLC, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Pauline (1992). Antecedent contained deletion in a variable-free semantics. In Barker, Chris and Dowty, David, editors, Proceedings of the Second Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, Columbus. Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Pauline (1993). i-within-i effects in a variable-free semantics and a categorial syntax. In Dekker, Paul et al., editor, Proceedings of the Ninth Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam. ILLC, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Pauline (1994). On copular connectivity. In Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, Ithaca. Cornell Working Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Pauline (1998). Antecedent contained deletion and pied piping: Evidence for a variable-free semantics. In Strolovitch, D. and Lawson, A., editors, Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, Ithaca. Cornell Working Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Pauline (1999). Towards a variable-free semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy, 22(2):117–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Pauline (2000a). Paycheck pronouns, Bach-Peters sentences, and variable-free semantics. Natural Language Semantics, 8:77–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Pauline (2000b). Paychecks and stress. In Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, Ithaca. Cornell Working Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Ronald (1995). The formal architecture of lexical-functional grammar. In Dalrymple et al., 1995, pages 7–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Ronald and Bresnan, Joan (1995). Lexical-functional grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. In Dalrymple et al., 1995, pages 29–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, Edward L. (1976). Reference restricting operators in universal grammar. In Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society. Berkeley Linguistic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klenin, Emily (1974). Russian Reflexive Pronouns and the Semantic Roles of Noun Phrases in Sentences. PhD thesis, Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambek, J. (1958). The mathematics of sentence structure. American Mathematical Monthly, 65:154–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montague, Richard (1974). The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, pages 247–270. Yale University Press, New Haven. Richmond H. Thoma-son, ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moortgat, Michael (1988). Categorial Investigations: Logical and Linguistic Aspects of the Lambek Calculus. Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrill, Glyn (1990). Intensionality and boundedness. Linguistics & Philosophy, 13(6):699–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, Fernando C. N. (1990). Categorial semantics and scoping. Computational Linguistics, 16(1):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, Fernando C. N. (1991). Prolog and natural-language analysis: into the third decade. In Debray, S. and Hermenegildo, M., editors, Logic Programming: Proceedings of the 1990 North American Conference, pages 813–832. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, Carl J. (1984). Generalized Phrase Structure Grammars, Head Grammars, and Natural Languages. PhD thesis, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. (1966). Variables explained away. In Selected Logic Papers, pages 227–235. Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, Tanya (1983). Coreference and bound anaphora: A restatement of the anaphora questions. Linguistics and Philosophy, 6:47–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, John Robert (1967). Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD thesis, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoenfield, Joseph R. (1967). Mathematical Logic. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timberlake, Alan (1979). Reflexivization and the cycle in russian. Linguistic Inquiry, 10(1): 109–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Genabith, Josef and Crouch, Dick (1999). Dynamic and underspecified semantics in lfg. In Dalrymple, Mary, editor, Semantics and Syntax in Lexical Functional Grammar: The Resource Logic Approach, pages 209–260. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Berkeley, CA, USA

    Richard T. Oehrle

Authors
  1. Richard T. Oehrle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. COLI, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany

    Geert-Jan M. Kruijff  & Richard T. Oehrle  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Oehrle, R.T. (2003). Some Precursors. In: Kruijff, GJ.M., Oehrle, R.T. (eds) Resource-Sensitivity, Binding and Anaphora. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 80. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0037-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0037-6_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1692-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0037-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation