Advertisement

Parallel Numerical Optimisation of Adaptive Transonic Airfoils

  • Thorsten Lutz
  • Andreas Sommerer
  • Siegfried Wagner
Part of the Fluid Mechanics and its Applications book series (FMIA, volume 73)

Abstract

In this paper a modular environment for the nested numerical optimisation of adaptive transonic airfoils is presented. Its efficiency is increased by an MPI based parallelisation approach. Several geometry parametrisation techniques were implemented and evaluated by means of the TAGUCHI method. Applying the optimisation tool, a transonic airfoil with an adaptive shock control bump was designed and compared to a supercritical airfoil optimised for identical design points.

Keywords

Design Variable TAGUCHI Method Airfoil Shape Airfoil Design Outer Cycle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Ashill, P. R., Fulker, J. L. and Shires, A. (1992). A Novel Technique for Controlling Shock Strength of Laminar-Flow Aerofoil Sections. Proc. 1st European Forum on Laminar Flow Technology, March 16–18, 1992, Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Drela, M. (1986). Two-Dimensional Transonic Aerodynamic Design and Analysis Using the Euler Equations. MIT, Gas Turbine Laboratory Report No. 187.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Eppler, R. (1990). Airfoil Design and Data. Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York, ISBN 3-540-52505-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Hansen, N. (1998). Verallgemeinerte individuelle Schrittweitenregelung in der Evolutionsstrategie: Eine Untersuchung zur entstochastisierten, koordinatensystemunabhängigen Adaption der Mutationsverteilung. Mensch & Buch Verlag, Berlin. ISBN 3-933346-29-0, 1998.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Lutz, Th. and Wagner, S. (2000). Numerical Shape Optimization of Subsonic Airfoil Sections. Proc. ECCOMAS 2000, September 11–14, 2000, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Oyama, A., Obayashi, S., Nakahashi, K. and Hirose, N. (2000). Aerodynamic Wing Optimization via Evolutionary Algorithms Based on Structured Coding. CFD Journal, Vol. 8, No. 1, January 2000.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Roy, R. K. (2001). Design of Experiments Using the Taguchi Approach. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., ISBN 0-471-36101-1.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Sommerer, A., Lutz, Th. and Wagner, S. (2000). Numerical Optimisation of Adaptive Transonic Airfoils with Variable Camber. Proc. 22nd ICAS Congress, 27 August-1 September, 2000, Harrogate.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thorsten Lutz
    • 1
  • Andreas Sommerer
    • 1
  • Siegfried Wagner
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Aerodynamics and Gas Dynamics (IAG)University of StuttgartStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations