Abstract
In analysis of recent numerical solutions of the flow about quite complex geometries, such as e.g. a full aircraft in landing configuration, one can find reasonable agreement with available experimental data. However, it is often difficult to simulate much simpler configurations, especially in the transonic regime, with sufficient accuracy (compared to the experiment). The main source of the discrepancies found is usually the turbulence model, which often fails once stronger transonic phenomena are present. The presence of a strong Shockwave in a turbulent flow has a significant influence on the development of the turbulence field in the region of the shock, as well as the mean flow properties mainly downstream of the shock discontinuity. Thus standard models require special modifications in order to handle the high pressure gradients and the often resulting separation in a consistent and physically realistic way. This becomes even more problematic for unsteady flows, e.g. a pitching airfoil, where good agreement in the steady case is a prerequisite, but no guarantee for good unsteady results when shock b.1. interaction with and without separation is present.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
AGARD “Compendium of Unsteady Aerodynamic Measurements”, AGARD Report No. 702, 1982.
Rung, T. “Erweiterung von Eingleichungs-Turbulenzmodellenfr lokales Nichtgle-ichgewicht, Institutsbericht Nr.03/98, Hermann-Fttinger Institut, Berlin, 1998.
Shur, M., Spalart, P., Strelets, M. and Travin, A., “Detached Eddy simulation of an airfoil at high angle of attack”, in: Rodi, W. and Laurence, D. (ed.), Proc. 4Th Int. Sym. Eng. Turb. Modeling and Measurements, pp 669–678, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1999
Strelets, M., “Detached Eddy simulation of Massively Separated Flows”, AIAA 2001-0879, 2001
Weinman. K., Schwamborn, D. “Simulation of steady and unsteady flows about airfoils” in W. Haase, V. Selmin, B. Winzell, Progress in Computational Flow-Structure Interaction. Results of the Project UNSI, Supported by the European Union 1998–2000. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, Vol 81, Springer, 2002.
Spalart, P. R., Jou, W. H., Strelets, M., and Allmaras, S. R. (1997) “Comments on the Feasibility of LES for Wings, And on a Hybrid RANS/LES Approach,” First AFOSR International Conference On DNS/LES, Aug. 4–8, 1997, Ruston, Louisiana. In Advances in DNS/LES, Liu, C., and Liu, Z., eds., Greyden Press, Columbus, Ohio
Rung, Th.., private communication, 2001
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schwamborn, D., Weinman, K. (2003). On the Influence of Turbulence Modeling on Steady and Unsteady Flows. In: Sobieczky, H. (eds) IUTAM Symposium Transsonicum IV. Fluid Mechanics and its Applications, vol 73. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0017-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0017-8_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3998-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0017-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive