Advertisement

Explaining Sex Differences in Publication Productivity among Postsecondary Faculty

  • Kimberlee A. Shauman
  • Yu Xie
Part of the Innovations in Science Education and Technology book series (ISET, volume 15)

Abstract

In all academic disciplines, scholarly productivity is a primary marker of career success. Productive scholars are rewarded with promotions in rank, favorable job mobility, and pay raises. Likewise, unproductive scholars are considered “unsuccessful” and are sometimes pushed out of their own institutions or out of the academy altogether. While publication rate of scholarly work per se may not be an accurate measure of scholarly contribution in all disciplines, the adage “publish or perish” portrays the pressure that pervades the postsecondary community. This adage emphasizes the weight placed on quantifiable measures of productivity in the assessment of scholarly contribution, and it reflects the important role of publication in determining career success among faculty in the academy. Given the strong link between publication productivity and career advancement, explaining sex differences in publication rates clearly advances our understanding of sex differences in the career progress and outcomes of postsecondary faculty. The large volume of research aimed at explaining sex differences in scholarly productivity attests to the importance of this effort (for reviews see Zuckerman 1991; Long and Fox 1995; Ward and Grant 1995). Until very recently (Xie and Shauman 1998), however, research was unsuccessful at explaining the reasons for sex differences in research productivity, and indeed such sex differences among scientists were labeled a “productivity puzzle” by Cole and Zuckerman (1984:218) and accepted as such by many other scholars. Equnl Rites, Unequal Outcomes: Women in American Research Universities Edited by Homig, Kluwer academic/Plenum Publishers, 2003

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahern, Nancy C, and Elizabeth L. Scott. 1981. Career outcomes in a matched sample of men and women Ph.D.s: An analytical report, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allison, Paul D., and J. Scott Long. 1990. Departmental effects on scientific productivity. American Sociological Review 55:469–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bentley, Richard J., and Robert T. Blackburn. 1992. Two decades of gains for female faculty? Teachers College Record 93:697–709.Google Scholar
  4. Bernard, Jessie. 1964. academic women, University Park, Penn.: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Blackburn, Robert T., Charles E. Behymer, and David E. Hall. 1978. Research note: Correlates of faculty Publications. Sociology of Education 51:132–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clemente, Frank. 1973. Early career determinants of research productivity. American Journal of Sociology 83:409–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cole, Jonathan R., and Harriet Zuckerman. 1984. The productivity puzzle: Persistence and change in patterns of publication among men and women scientists. In Advances in motivation and achievement, vol. 2, ed. P. Maehr and M. W. Steinkamp. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  8. -, and Harriet Zuckerman. 1987. Marriage, motherhood and research performance in science. Scientific American 25:119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fox, Mary F. 1981. Patterns and determinants of research productivity. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Sociology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  10. Hargens, Lowell L., James C. McCann, and Barbara F. Reskin. 1978. productivity and reproductivity: Fertility and professional achievement among research scientists. Social Forces 57:154–163.Google Scholar
  11. Levin, Sharon G., and Paula E. Stephan. 1991. Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists. American Economic Review 81:114–132.Google Scholar
  12. Long, J. Scott. 1978. productivity and academic position in the scientific career. American Sociological Review 43:889–908.Google Scholar
  13. -. 1992. Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces 71:159–178.Google Scholar
  14. -. 1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. -, and Mary F. Fox. 1995. Scientific careers: Universalism and particularism. Annual Review of Sociology 21:45–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Reskin, Barbara F. 1978. Scientific productivity, sex, and location in the institution of science. American Journal of Sociology 83:1235–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ward, Kathryn B., and Linda Grant. 1995. Gender and academic publishing. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, vol. 11, ed. A. E. Bayer and J. C. Smart. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
  18. Xie, Yu, and Kimberlee A. Shauman. 1998. Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review 63:847–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zuckerman, Harriet. 1991. The careers of men and women scientists: A review of current research. In The outer circle: Women in the scientific community, ed. Harriet Zuckerman, Jonathan R. Cole, and John T. Bruer. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kimberlee A. Shauman
  • Yu Xie

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations