Abstract
In all academic disciplines, scholarly productivity is a primary marker of career success. Productive scholars are rewarded with promotions in rank, favorable job mobility, and pay raises. Likewise, unproductive scholars are considered “unsuccessful” and are sometimes pushed out of their own institutions or out of the academy altogether. While publication rate of scholarly work per se may not be an accurate measure of scholarly contribution in all disciplines, the adage “publish or perish” portrays the pressure that pervades the postsecondary community. This adage emphasizes the weight placed on quantifiable measures of productivity in the assessment of scholarly contribution, and it reflects the important role of publication in determining career success among faculty in the academy. Given the strong link between publication productivity and career advancement, explaining sex differences in publication rates clearly advances our understanding of sex differences in the career progress and outcomes of postsecondary faculty. The large volume of research aimed at explaining sex differences in scholarly productivity attests to the importance of this effort (for reviews see Zuckerman 1991; Long and Fox 1995; Ward and Grant 1995). Until very recently (Xie and Shauman 1998), however, research was unsuccessful at explaining the reasons for sex differences in research productivity, and indeed such sex differences among scientists were labeled a “productivity puzzle” by Cole and Zuckerman (1984:218) and accepted as such by many other scholars. Equnl Rites, Unequal Outcomes: Women in American Research Universities Edited by Homig, Kluwer academic/Plenum Publishers, 2003
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ahern, Nancy C, and Elizabeth L. Scott. 1981. Career outcomes in a matched sample of men and women Ph.D.s: An analytical report, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Allison, Paul D., and J. Scott Long. 1990. Departmental effects on scientific productivity. American Sociological Review 55:469–478.
Bentley, Richard J., and Robert T. Blackburn. 1992. Two decades of gains for female faculty? Teachers College Record 93:697–709.
Bernard, Jessie. 1964. academic women, University Park, Penn.: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Blackburn, Robert T., Charles E. Behymer, and David E. Hall. 1978. Research note: Correlates of faculty Publications. Sociology of Education 51:132–141.
Clemente, Frank. 1973. Early career determinants of research productivity. American Journal of Sociology 83:409–419.
Cole, Jonathan R., and Harriet Zuckerman. 1984. The productivity puzzle: Persistence and change in patterns of publication among men and women scientists. In Advances in motivation and achievement, vol. 2, ed. P. Maehr and M. W. Steinkamp. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.
-, and Harriet Zuckerman. 1987. Marriage, motherhood and research performance in science. Scientific American 25:119–125.
Fox, Mary F. 1981. Patterns and determinants of research productivity. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Sociology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Hargens, Lowell L., James C. McCann, and Barbara F. Reskin. 1978. productivity and reproductivity: Fertility and professional achievement among research scientists. Social Forces 57:154–163.
Levin, Sharon G., and Paula E. Stephan. 1991. Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists. American Economic Review 81:114–132.
Long, J. Scott. 1978. productivity and academic position in the scientific career. American Sociological Review 43:889–908.
-. 1992. Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces 71:159–178.
-. 1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.
-, and Mary F. Fox. 1995. Scientific careers: Universalism and particularism. Annual Review of Sociology 21:45–71.
Reskin, Barbara F. 1978. Scientific productivity, sex, and location in the institution of science. American Journal of Sociology 83:1235–1243.
Ward, Kathryn B., and Linda Grant. 1995. Gender and academic publishing. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, vol. 11, ed. A. E. Bayer and J. C. Smart. New York: Agathon.
Xie, Yu, and Kimberlee A. Shauman. 1998. Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review 63:847–870.
Zuckerman, Harriet. 1991. The careers of men and women scientists: A review of current research. In The outer circle: Women in the scientific community, ed. Harriet Zuckerman, Jonathan R. Cole, and John T. Bruer. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shauman, K.A., Xie, Y. (2003). Explaining Sex Differences in Publication Productivity among Postsecondary Faculty. In: Hornig, L.S. (eds) Equal Rites, Unequal Outcomes. Innovations in Science Education and Technology, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0007-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0007-9_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-47351-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0007-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive